Home          Your notes are welcome: Editor@UpperWindpower.com             Most recent edit: Thursday January 31, 2013

Angus J. Tocher

Two patent applications that may have a non-empty intersection with kite energy.  The text seems to have a towered focus, but it seems obvious that the notions may be placed into upper winds by use of kite systems.  Especially in the 2008 filing's teaching, the concentrators invite one skilled in the arts to think about having such arrays lifted by kytoon or kite systems to the upper winds with the "tower" being supplanted with a lifting kite system.   ~JpF, Jan. 31, 2013.  
  • Application for patent filed in 2003 Laminar flow, suction driven, wind energy conversion
  • Application for patent filed in 2008  Integrally Ribbed Rogallo Wing Array  This has been approved:
    US08358027
    INTEGRALLY RIBBED ROGALLO WING ARRAY
    Angus J. Tocher, Calgary (Canada)
    Assigned to Slingshot Wind Energy Systems Inc., Calgary, Alberta (Canada)
    Filed by Angus J. Tocher, Calgary (Canada)
    Filed on Jul. 28, 2008, as Appl. No. 12/181,095.
    Prior Publication US 2010/0019099 A1, Jan. 28, 2010
    Int. Cl. 
    F03D 9/00 (2006.01)
Discussion places:
  • Also, Wind Energy Extraction System           EP1778972 (A1)
  •  
Commentary over the tech:

JoeF,
Its awkward for us to socially welcome and soundly critique marginal players at the same time, so let's figure out a less cruel but still rigorous induction process. In our Age-of-Crisis reality, more than manners, we need to be astute as to what we see as viable AWE concepts, otherwise endless mistaken ideas will bury us.

Even on towers, Angus Tocher's patents hardly promise to compete in any way against highly refined and amazing modern HAWTs. As Doug taught us, you beat any folk-contraption on a pole with a slightly bigger conventional rotor. These designs are no exception, nor is any historic inventive leap apparent in them to offer some hope. He should promptly build small working models to endurance test alongside a standard equivalent turbine, rather than accept or reject "expert" pessimism untested.

It is hard to see any real Rogallo thinking in the Scott-sled style (parallel-battened) surfaces. There is scant evidence of known venturi design principles (angles and proportions). We know that venturis as such (rigid framed) and complex ducting do not ever seem to pay in WECS, nor will they scale. The older vacuum-based patent ignores the low maximum pressure-differential available, of only 15 psi. These are even less promising as flying machines, with poor power-to-weight, high static drag, and hardly any feature applied optimally for flight. I hope Tocher did not go broke on patent expenses and can build rationally on the fine direct lessons that testing his ideas offers. He and his team are always invited to transition into hotter AWES design paths, when they are ready.

It is no fun (unless you are Doug :) ) to take on the job to pop this sort of Gipe-warned bubble, but we do, lest we drive away our elite engineering talents by an unrestrained social-promotion dynamic.

Sorry for the "bad news,"
daveS

 
Questions
  • ?
  • ?
Terms and concepts

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Let us know you and your interests.
News, notes, documents, files:  Editor@UpperWindpower.com
~~Kite Energy Community~~