Messages in AirborneWindEnergy group.                          AWES 23954 to 24007 Page 371 of 440.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23954 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 10/5/2018
Subject: Re: Bladetips Energy latest new player

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23955 From: Peter A. Sharp Date: 10/5/2018
Subject: Re: AWE where, how?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23956 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 10/6/2018
Subject: Re: AWE where, how?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23957 From: dave santos Date: 10/6/2018
Subject: Re: Searches to obtain a durable fabric for flexible power kites

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23958 From: dave santos Date: 10/6/2018
Subject: Re: Kitemill flies its 30 kW kite

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23959 From: dave santos Date: 10/6/2018
Subject: Re: Bladetips Energy latest new player

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23960 From: dave santos Date: 10/6/2018
Subject: Re: AWE where, how?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23961 From: dave santos Date: 10/6/2018
Subject: Re: AWE where, how?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23962 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 10/6/2018
Subject: Re: AWE where, how?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23963 From: dave santos Date: 10/6/2018
Subject: Re: AWE where, how?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23964 From: dave santos Date: 10/6/2018
Subject: Smelting Metals by Kiteships

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23965 From: dave santos Date: 10/6/2018
Subject: Emergent Offshore Industrialization by means of Kites?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23966 From: dave santos Date: 10/6/2018
Subject: Theory of Kite Multi-Use

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23967 From: dave santos Date: 10/6/2018
Subject: Electric KiteShips without Fishkilling Turbines

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23969 From: benhaiemp Date: 10/7/2018
Subject: Re: AWE where, how?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23971 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 10/7/2018
Subject: Re: AWE where, how?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23972 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 10/7/2018
Subject: Re: AWE where, how?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23973 From: snapscan_snapscan Date: 10/7/2018
Subject: Spanish windmills going Airborne - Now what, Don Quijote?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23974 From: tallakt Date: 10/7/2018
Subject: Re: Kitemill flies its 30 kW kite

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23975 From: benhaiemp Date: 10/7/2018
Subject: Re: Energy storage conversation

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23976 From: dave santos Date: 10/7/2018
Subject: Re: Spanish windmills going Airborne - Now what, Don Quijote?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23977 From: dave santos Date: 10/7/2018
Subject: Re: Kitemill flies its 30 kW kite

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23978 From: dave santos Date: 10/7/2018
Subject: Re: Energy storage conversation

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23979 From: benhaiemp Date: 10/7/2018
Subject: Re: Energy storage conversation

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23980 From: Peter A. Sharp Date: 10/7/2018
Subject: Re: Energy storage conversation

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23981 From: dave santos Date: 10/7/2018
Subject: Re: Energy storage conversation

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23982 From: dave santos Date: 10/7/2018
Subject: Fw: Lang's H2 Kiteship Paper

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23983 From: dave santos Date: 10/7/2018
Subject: Reinhart's Revolutionary SS PG in updated production

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23984 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 10/7/2018
Subject: Re: Fw: Lang's H2 Kiteship Paper

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23986 From: dave santos Date: 10/7/2018
Subject: Re: Fw: Lang's H2 Kiteship Paper

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23987 From: benhaiemp Date: 10/7/2018
Subject: Re: AWE where, how?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23988 From: dave santos Date: 10/7/2018
Subject: Re: AWE where, how?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23990 From: benhaiemp Date: 10/8/2018
Subject: AWES in forests?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23991 From: Hardensoft International Limited Date: 10/8/2018
Subject: Re: Emergent Offshore Industrialization by means of Kites?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23992 From: benhaiemp Date: 10/8/2018
Subject: GIEC report

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23993 From: dave santos Date: 10/8/2018
Subject: Return of the tower in AWE? Not so fast...

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23994 From: dave santos Date: 10/8/2018
Subject: Re: GIEC report [1 Attachment]

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23995 From: benhaiemp Date: 10/8/2018
Subject: Re: Energy storage conversation

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23996 From: dave santos Date: 10/8/2018
Subject: Re: Energy storage conversation

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23997 From: dougselsam Date: 10/8/2018
Subject: Re: AWE where, how?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23998 From: dougselsam Date: 10/8/2018
Subject: Re: Spanish windmills going Airborne - Now what, Don Quijote?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23999 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 10/8/2018
Subject: Re: Spanish windmills going Airborne - Now what, Don Quijote?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 24000 From: benhaiemp Date: 10/8/2018
Subject: Re: Spanish windmills going Airborne - Now what, Don Quijote?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 24001 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 10/8/2018
Subject: Water launch at its fullest in kitefoiling

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 24002 From: dave santos Date: 10/8/2018
Subject: Re: Emergent Offshore Industrialization by means of Kites?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 24003 From: dave santos Date: 10/8/2018
Subject: Re: Water launch at its fullest in kitefoiling

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 24004 From: dave santos Date: 10/8/2018
Subject: more kite golden-age man-lifting history

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 24005 From: Peter A. Sharp Date: 10/9/2018
Subject: Re: Energy storage conversation

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 24006 From: dave santos Date: 10/9/2018
Subject: Re: Energy storage conversation

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 24007 From: dave santos Date: 10/9/2018
Subject: Review of Kite/Gas-Turbine Hybrid Concept (redirected topic)




Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23954 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 10/5/2018
Subject: Re: Bladetips Energy latest new player

Airborne device

Priority 2014-07-21 • Filing 2015-07-15 • Publication 2017-07-27

The invention concerns an airborne device comprising at least three supporting wings and a linking device, the wings being linked to each other by first flexible cables, each wing being further linked to the linking device by a second flexible cable, the linking device being linked to a third …

AIRBORNE device

Priority 2016-10-31 • Filing 2016-10-31 • Publication 2018-05-04

The invention relates to an airborne device (10) comprising at least three supporting legs (12) and a connecting device (18), the flanges being interconnected by first cables (14, 16), each wing being further connected to the connecting device (18) by a second cable (20), the connecting device …
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23955 From: Peter A. Sharp Date: 10/5/2018
Subject: Re: AWE where, how?
Attachments :

    DaveS,

    Where do I find his white paper? A search reveals nothing so far.

    PeterS

     

    From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
    Sent: Monday, October 01, 2018 1:49 PM
    To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: RE: [AWES] AWE where, how?

     

     

    PeterS,

    Not sure what my "overgeneralizing" was, since the specific points about masted-mass boat instability factor and kitefouling mast risk were both specific and third-party concerns. Just how the Sharp Turboship resolves these particular problems better than prior design concepts, with no mast-mass/obstacle, is unclear to me.

    In any case, the Sharp Turboship is not the only H-based AWES ship concept, and Dave Lang's peer-reviewed White Paper remains our best reference for the concept space. He did not call for deck turbines to augment the core kite basis, as the thinking was (is) that added deck turbines compound cost and complication, with most of the power potential inherent in the kite part. A kite quiver to cover wind ranges is presumed. Deck turbines neither shine in low or high wind, while a kite quiver covers more wind range than any other previous wind tech, excepting sailboats with a suite of sails,

    daveS

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23956 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 10/6/2018
    Subject: Re: AWE where, how?

    Doug,

     

    Please see the figure 1 and the table 1 of "Wind Integration: Incremental Emissions from Back-Up Generation Cycling" on  https://www.masterresource.org/wind-power/wind-integration-incremental-emissions-from-back-up-generation-cycling-part-v-calculator-update/.

    "Table 1 shows the increases in CO2 emissions and fossil fuel consumption (as it is in direct proportion to the CO2 emissions) of the three plant types for a range of efficiency losses derived from Figure 1."

    So the wind intermittency leads to more consumption of fossil fuel consumption. Taking also account of alternating stops and starts adding yet consumption.

     

    PierreB

     

     

     

     

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23957 From: dave santos Date: 10/6/2018
    Subject: Re: Searches to obtain a durable fabric for flexible power kites
    E-kite must have abused its kites by flying in wind greater than the design loadings, or "thumping" them by control-failure crashing, failing to conduct early repair or preventative maintenance, or another such O&M error.

    As for commercial tarp performance, there is very little relation to AWE except as the cheapest way to test many interesting ideas. Every expert kite designer and flyer knows how to avoid "flogging" flapping that can harm kite fabric quickly.

    All kite sports (incl. PG/HG) enjoy reasonable fabric life. kPower has still never worn out a kite by frequent flying over many years. Fabric covered airplanes and sailboat sails are other great sources of encouraging fabric performance.

    Experts like Peter Lynn and SkySails remain the best expert opinion sources on kite fabric endurance. Their embrace of fabric is based on direct skilled experience and the inherent lower cost compared to rigid wings, and superior performance by weight-to-power.

    No wing is destroyed faster or costs more than a crashing rigid wing.
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23958 From: dave santos Date: 10/6/2018
    Subject: Re: Kitemill flies its 30 kW kite
    A fantastically beautiful AWES video by KiteMill of their high-performance kiteplane in action, in low to moderate breeze (4-9 msec surface wind). 16kW session peak power is quite good for a small kiteplane in moderate wind.

    The airframe is seen as aeroelastically very stable under the deep cyclic loads, with only slight wing deflection visible from the airborne camera (image stabilization may mask shorter-period vibrations). There is apparent upper line-strum noise at the groundgen-winch, but not readily noticeable from the airframe camera sound-feed dominated by wind-mic noise. Airborne stereo audio reveals cyclic velocity and slight crab angle changes.

    Kitemill has roughly matched Ampyx's accomplishments, in the same general design space, with a tiny fraction of the budget. Concerns remain about the complex scalability factors and long term safety-reliability of high-performance kiteplanes, challenges where giant fabric kites may dominate. No one can deny the thrilling performance of moderately sized hot kiteplane prototypes.

    Congratulations to the talented KiteMill Team on its fine performance.
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23959 From: dave santos Date: 10/6/2018
    Subject: Re: Bladetips Energy latest new player
    Perhaps only a "Crazy Mexican" aerospace savant, RogelioL could cobble such a compelling AWES platform from the problematically withered foundations of SkyWindPower and SkyMills' architectures. It will always be found that autogyros cannot scale greatly under cubic-mass penalty, relative to most-probable wind-constants (note also that all rotors centrifugally stiffen).

    What Rogelio is really showing is nomadic genius "right stuff" to explore across the entire AWES architectural space. Count on him to migrate from AWES architecture to architecture as needed to gain comprehensive empiric knowledge, just as he began at TUGrenoble; under Prof. Hably, himself an architectural nomad. Compare such rare restless figures with all those in AWE with "one idea only".
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23960 From: dave santos Date: 10/6/2018
    Subject: Re: AWE where, how?
    PeterS

    Dave Lang's whitepaper on H-generating kiteships should be linked or archived somewhere on JoeF's content. Sadly, ordinary search no longer serves well to find obscure AWE references, as consumer-grade algorithms bias results toward preferred content, and the global knowledge haystack has grown so large.

    Even if we never again find this paper, just be aware that the idea has a considerable history. There was also a prominent Korean AWES scheme based on a catamaran hull, and considerable general discussion on this forum.

    Hoping and praying DaveL is still well and kickin',

    daveS
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23961 From: dave santos Date: 10/6/2018
    Subject: Re: AWE where, how?
    Lets keep in mind CristinaA's old calculations that wind intermittency impact is potentially far less for AWES than surface wind, and that modern inter-regional electric grids span across common weather patterns of wind or calm. Consider also kPower's invokation of potential fossil-fuel/kite hybrid plants, extending the AWE engineering bridge from legacy energy to clean energy. Therefore, intermittency is not much for us to fret about. In fact, early AWE "needs" wind intermittency for our aviation-based maintenance cycles.

    All in all, there is a better case for AWE as part of the future energy mix than any poorly informed pessimist may allow.
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23962 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 10/6/2018
    Subject: Re: AWE where, how?

    I am quoting the end of my first message about the current topic: "The capacity factor being far higher and the intermittency being far lower in high altitude and/or far offshore, the storage concern would be lesser."

    It is useless to put forward ceaselessly on the best reachable winds by AWE. Any newbie knows it. Knowing studies like on https://www.masterresource.org/wind-power/wind-integration-incremental-emissions-from-back-up-generation-cycling-part-v-calculator-update/ (I quote again for some newbie) then analysing it in a AWE perspective can be better than pseudo-psychological considerations.

     

    PierreB

     

     

     

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23963 From: dave santos Date: 10/6/2018
    Subject: Re: AWE where, how?
    In principle, large electric grids and AWE can reduce wind energy intermittency problems based on surface wind; and that's just a small taste of the exciting problem solving potential of kites, the core reality that drives engineering of "how" and "where".

    This may be too obvious for some AWE pros to write about, but we want novices to also know such basic things, and hope they read them here, or anywhere else. We constantly refer to more basic AWE facts as we ponder more complex facts, always radically returning to fundamentals; as children, experts, and champions do.

    AWE where, how? In upper-wind (or any flow), by means of kites; obvious or not.
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23964 From: dave santos Date: 10/6/2018
    Subject: Smelting Metals by Kiteships
    DougS wrote, in the context of a Sharp Turboship-

    "...start with an RC scale-model, where basic functionality could be verified.
    When there is excess electricity, they usually end up smelting aluminum.

    Maybe the turboship could smelt aluminum."


    ===notes===

    Let "turboship" stand here as any sort of wind turbine ship, in principle. Kiteships are our long particular interest, in AWE.

    We have long considered kiteship generating fuels, grinding materials, charging batteries, purifying water, and similar ideas. Smelting metals seems to be novel and potentially significant addition to the list of possibilities. Scrap metal and deep-sea manganese nodules are specific smelting materials. Thanks to Doug for this idea.
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23965 From: dave santos Date: 10/6/2018
    Subject: Emergent Offshore Industrialization by means of Kites?
    As our ideas for kiteship energy adoption have proliferated, a new picture emerges of the grand possibilities to host entire industrial supply chains offshore. A partial trend has already been evident in naval fleets and industrial fishing, where a diverse mix of ships contribute to one overall enterprise. Call these methods a sort of shipping internet substantially decoupled from land operations. Ship Kites provide the theoretic energy to sustain vast offshore operations without onshore fuel dependence.

    How might this work someday? Smaller ships from coastal ports could haul scrap metal to smelting superships that ferry to the Southern Ocean, where wind power is greatest. The metal output could be transported to other factory kiteships that make industrial parts, in turn passed to assembly kiteships, and finally to distribution shipping serving coastal ports. There might be major economic and ecological benefits. Land area is relatively scarce, and kite ships can be designed to operate quite slowly and benignly, perhaps even hosting thriving sea-life colonies, like large floating objects at sea naturally do. Ecological services like plastic waste and dead-zone remediation seem possible.

    Perhaps even floating cities will become hubs of true seaborne civilization, by means of kites. The monolithic floating city as originally conceived would give way to a much more mixed super-fleet of specialized shipping to provide every sort of civilizational service. Airborne and underwater kites could be the key to such complex emergent "waterworld" Utopias, not just a way to power any single-output ship process we can think of. Sea level rise could be a primary driver of our return to sea. This may be a basis to sooner colonize the sky by means of kites, with floating rather than grounded anchors.

    Compare such happy musings with petty fears that AWE cannot succeed, based on narrow objections. Lets agree with Wubbo, that we do not face any impossible challenge to engineer the glorious AWE future we want, if we seek the wisdom and skills to make it so.
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23966 From: dave santos Date: 10/6/2018
    Subject: Theory of Kite Multi-Use
    It may now seem obvious that a good kite can be used many ways, but most kites in the past had only one or two uses, and were not very versatile. Thus a stone-age kite might help catch a fish or signal over distance, but not much more. Power kites opened up endless new capabilities, thus the kite-sport power kite is ideal for AWES experimentation, although it was not intended so.

    The most versatile kites perform best by power-to-weight, are robust, and easy to handle. Broadly, there are a few modern super-kites, Delta and Sled, at small scale, Parafoil at larger scale, and Single-Skin at the largest scale. Respecting JoeF's 10 scales of AWES, a generalized kite at each scale is most suited the a particular set of uses at that scale. Then, at each scale, the optimal kite design itself tends to change, like small kites have sticks but large kites do not. Furthermore, there is a scale of windspeeds, so ideal kites need wide wind ranges, and kite quivers cover gaps any single kite has.

    Another dimension to multiuse kites is adapting new uses. The pioneering engineering work is often not in the kite, but in the app itself, or the novel interface to it. The biggest such app is to adapt kite power to synchronous electrical generation, matched with varied load and wind. If we do that, endless other apps are practical. We are close to such matched performance, already there in kite sports and exploration.

    Its been sometimes asked why no one is powering just a homestead with AWE, ignoring that massive kite sleds have crossed Iceland's ice cap, sea going kite boats crossed oceans, or kite buggy expeditions, or kite cars crossing continents; these have all sustained wonderful nomadic life, complete with electrical generation for modern life. Its a kite paradox of remoteness, that a kite is less versatile in a city than in the middle of "nowhere", a blank canvas where it an do almost anything. Thus kite multi-use is also a condition of remoteness and the will one has to use a kite over alternatives.

    What then is left to make the kite work best? Great design and materials, adjustable settings, variable surfaces (ie tails), reinforced load paths and bridle-points, high visibility, etc. A quiver with overlapping capabilities completes broad possibilities. The kite is potentially as multi-use as chipped stone and fire, if not string itself. Quasi-superhero lifestyles are emerging. The modern alpine XC paraglider pilots flies with eagles by day, then curls up in her kite at night, sleeping with eagles; such inherent kite multi use versatility and glory.
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23967 From: dave santos Date: 10/6/2018
    Subject: Electric KiteShips without Fishkilling Turbines
    An undersea turbine can kill fish just as a wind turbine can kill birds. Fortunately, no underwater turbine is required for AWE at sea. A kiteship can simply use its hull lift and drag, its total water resistance, to host an AWES whose load motion is tapped on-deck. Kiteship's Dave Culp long ago determined that the long hull of a modern ship develops reasonable hydrofoil lift suited for crosswind kite courses. Massive ship resistance to frontal and sideforce means that almost any AWES concept can operate from a ship deck, including electrical generation designs.

    Seeing the ship deck like a self-sufficient kite farm, the compounded cost and complication of an underwater turbine PTO is avoided. Of course, the kite part should not kill seabirds, so large slow powerkites are favored, not just for their inherent low cost and superior scalable power. Without resorting to downwind reeling cycles, the basic AWES constraint is to use the deck boat-length as a crosswind course, by either PTO pullies or track basis. We have known about such kiteship rigging possibilities, but not to promote sea-life preservation. We wrongly tended to presume underwater turbine dependence.
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23969 From: benhaiemp Date: 10/7/2018
    Subject: Re: AWE where, how?

    Concerning land/sea footprint using light towers like Florian Bauer mentions (for other reasons) on https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-1947-0_18 could be a solution as the kite and its whole tether remain far above sea/land level during the full operation.

    PierreB



    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23971 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 10/7/2018
    Subject: Re: AWE where, how?

    The paper was part of Journal 16   at Drachen Foundation. 

    Today, the link finally worked. But the link had some failure into a Drupal server.  


    This worked, but not always:

    http://www.drachen.org/sites/default/files/pdf/Journal%20Issue%2016.pdf


    Also, I'll send a copy in email to you PeterS. 


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23972 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 10/7/2018
    Subject: Re: AWE where, how?

    The new link has been installed at


    http://energykitesystems.net/DaveLang/index.html


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23973 From: snapscan_snapscan Date: 10/7/2018
    Subject: Spanish windmills going Airborne - Now what, Don Quijote?

    Dear all,


    I have just uploaded some footage of the first successful test flight of my torsion based Airborne Wind Energy System after my move to Spain that I thought you might enjoy:


    https://youtu.be/51dEJk2xrlI


    Enjoy :)

    /cb


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23974 From: tallakt Date: 10/7/2018
    Subject: Re: Kitemill flies its 30 kW kite
    Hi. I will take this opportunity to introduce myself.

    My name is Tallak Tveide and I started working in Kitemill last December as a software and controls engineer. I have been lurking on this group for years, and as kitesurfing in its many forms has been my hobby for a long while, working with AWE was very compelling to me.

    I thought I’d repeat some of the news released by Kitemill on this forum, and I’ll do my best to answer any questions. This being said, please understand that by representing Kitemill in this forum, I need to weigh my words quite carefully, with regards to Kitemill’s investors (not releasing any news that might affect price of shares) and also protecting intellectual property.

    If this becomes a problem I’ll happily forward any questions to Kitemill’s management. To be clear, i am not in any way responsible for PR in Kitemill.

    Thanks Dave S for your kind words. The team has felt we are in a very productive phase with lots of progress, and it makes me happy to hear similar sentiments from an outside person.

    Tallak Tveide
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23975 From: benhaiemp Date: 10/7/2018
    Subject: Re: Energy storage conversation

    https://www.masterresource.org/wind-power/wind-integration-incremental-emissions-from-back-up-generation-cycling-part-v-calculator-update indicates:" As might be expected the increased gas consumption and CO2 emissions with the presence of wind increases as the wind capacity factor increases. This reflects the increased amount of volatility of wind production, especially during high wind production periods."

    This is confirmed by other studies. So all wind energy would be concerned, and particularly offshore wind turbines and AWES due to their higher capacity factor.

    In these conditions using electricity to manufacture energy products makes sense. Energy products can be hydrogen, or rather ammonia which is easier to store, or other. These energy products would be used as fuel, and not as storage since they would not feed the grid.

    So Peters' plan makes sense.


    PierreB

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23976 From: dave santos Date: 10/7/2018
    Subject: Re: Spanish windmills going Airborne - Now what, Don Quijote?
    Hi CB,

    Wonderful session. Nice prototype build. The torque drive is most compelling instance of applied tensegrity ever. Hypnotic. Good overall flight stability. Further validation of passive-control capability and KiteLab/kPower observation of passive turbine parking before landing in lulls.

    Power reading best disregarded; the WECS part easily would have topped 100W in the gusts, but its quite tricky to measure power via an arbitrary passive generator and fixed load. Measuring braking-force (de Prony Brake) is better data. A slightly larger pilot-lifter, with an elastic tether section to transiently store lift, can be an easy upgrade of general capability.

    Thanks for sharing. Great to see you experimenting; looking forward to future developments.

    daveS
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23977 From: dave santos Date: 10/7/2018
    Subject: Re: Kitemill flies its 30 kW kite
    Hi Tallak,

    Let Kitemill investors be well contented with Kitemill's momentum in having not just a great AWE test location, but also a leading prototype-engineering program, at a fraction of what too many less effective prior efforts spent. The grand business opportunity is for Kitemill to assert leadership across global AWE R&D by developing its early stated intent to host comparative research, and follow that trail wherever it leads. For example, a working partnership with SkySails would in effect span the current AWES architectural space, by two top players.

    The early investment goldmine is major R&D work. The trap most ventures are falling into is competition marketing similar premature products to limited markets. You well know whatever code or hardware anyone depends on now is far more experimental than commercial. The engineering long game is to be standing with whatever AWES architecture industrially prevails.

    Therefore, the question here is not so much technical as strategic: Is KiteMill management intent on the IP pooling, partnerships, mergers, and acquisitions required to lead the global AWE field to success?

    Cheers to All,

    daveS

    kPower
    Austin
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23978 From: dave santos Date: 10/7/2018
    Subject: Re: Energy storage conversation
    On the positive side of increasing renewable energy, with intermittency and storage at issue; there is the certain promise of Smart-Grids to drop non-critical loads when needed. This might include worker's breaks and holidays during extreme calm/shade events (far smarter than clock- and calendar-certain holidays only)

    Combined with large grids spanning continental weather variation, there is considerable scope to add AWE into the global energy mix. Its unduly pessimistic that AWE must increase dependence on legacy fuel-based plants. While there will always be AWE pessimists, we best develop AWE on reasonable optimistic logic.
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23979 From: benhaiemp Date: 10/7/2018
    Subject: Re: Energy storage conversation

    As we are responsible AWE searchers we produce various scenarios: making energy products or/and HDVC connection to the grid or/and indexation of the electricity price according to the announced weather report.

    A deeper analysis will determine what is suited.

    PierreB

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23980 From: Peter A. Sharp Date: 10/7/2018
    Subject: Re: Energy storage conversation
    Attachments :

      Hi Pierre,

                Using back-up generating plants for renewables is redundant and expensive. It would be much better, where ever possible, to integrate wind with natural gas powered generating plants, at least during the transition to all renewable energy. One way to do that is to have the windmills compress air, and save the heat of compression. That provides energy storage. Then the compressed air is used in the gas turbine, with the result that the gas turbine does not need to consume natural gas during its air compression part of the cycle. As I recall, that can about double the efficiency of the gas turbine, which means a 50% reduction in CO2. The heat of compression can be added to the compressed air before using it in the gas turbine, thus increasing the temperature and pressure of the compressed air.

                Another approach is to use windmills or kites to generate only heat using direct agitation of a heat-resistant substance. Then the heat can be used to create steam for a steam turbine, in conjunction with the usual fuels such as nuclear, coal, wood chips, crop residue, or solar-thermal plants.

                The problem with these options is that it is difficult to locate windmills or energy kites close enough to a conventional generating plant. So it is important for renewable energy sources to be designed in ways that can make integration possible. HVDC lines may make it possible to locate gas turbine generating plants on wind farms (windmills or kites), thus facilitating integration.

                The cheapest energy conversion is to convert wind energy directly into heat because the mechanisms are simple and inexpensive, and the conversion efficiency is, in principle, 100%. The heat-storage medium can be inexpensive, such as molten salts as used for solar-thermal plants.

                Fossil fuel generating plants have built-in energy storage in the form of the fuel itself. Wind energy designers need to think in terms of integrating energy storage with energy production. Direct wind to electricity makes good sense when wind is only a small part of the energy mix. But as its contribution increases, built-in energy storage becomes more necessary.

                The need for water desalination is increasing rapidly. Converting wind energy directly into heat for vacuum distillation might become relatively cheap and efficient. But I don’t have the figures on that. The use of fossil fuels for desalinating water is clearly the wrong way to go. How about an integrated plant that uses stored heat from wind energy to produce steam from salt water -- to generate electricity -- which also produces fresh water? Does the technology exist? I would assume that it exists but that it is still too expensive. Salt corrosion might be the main barrier.

                Our current energy grids discard excess wind energy when supply is high and demand is low. That is wasteful. Amory Lovins has suggested using the batteries of electric cars as a major energy storage medium for renewable energy. (But I consider cars, even electric cars, to be extremely wasteful in themselves – as compared to using a Personal Rapid Transit system that integrates both private and public vehicles.) Should we store energy before or after it is converted into electricity? For the grid, I say before, not after, in most cases so as to reduce costs and increase efficiency.

      PeterS

       

      From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
      Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2018 5:54 AM
      To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: [AWES] Re: Energy storage conversation

       

       

      https://www.masterresource.org/wind-power/wind-integration-incremental-emissions-from-back-up-generation-cycling-part-v-calculator-update indicates:" As might be expected the increased gas consumption and CO2 emissions with the presence of wind increases as the wind capacity factor increases. This reflects the increased amount of volatility of wind production, especially during high wind production periods."

      This is confirmed by other studies. So all wind energy would be concerned, and particularly offshore wind turbines and AWES due to their higher capacity factor.

      In these conditions using electricity to manufacture energy products makes sense. Energy products can be hydrogen, or rather ammonia which is easier to store, or other. These energy products would be used as fuel, and not as storage since they would not feed the grid.

      So Peters' plan makes sense.

       

      PierreB

      Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23981 From: dave santos Date: 10/7/2018
      Subject: Re: Energy storage conversation
      The hard part is to be ready for anything that future conditions demand. Its risky to reason from preferred economic/technical/social conditions over real-world conditions. Another way to understand the "Way of AWE" is to be so skilled in kites that outside variables of storage and transmission scarcely matter.

      Take the worst case of a poverty-determined grid that is old and inadequate, with air traffic, over populated areas. If AWE is perfected sufficiently, it will work well for those people, just as it could work well in the most advanced grids, and everything in-between. It is worth insisting that the interface between AWE and everything else is the key part, not the relative merits of endless contending components.

      The R&D question is whether to focus on the kite or be reduced to reviewing specific adjunct technologies away from their own elite forums (like the best way to make DIY ammonia). That is why an Energy Storage Conversation in AWE needs to include concern over possible lack of focus. We have seen the claims that some storage or transmission technology is the key, but that does not yet help us perfect the kite. There are better forums to debate focus; the focus here is truly kites.

      Once again, we repeat "obvious" discussions for novices to then decide where to focus (storage v generation).
      Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23982 From: dave santos Date: 10/7/2018
      Subject: Fw: Lang's H2 Kiteship Paper
      Attachments :
        --- On Fri, 5/8/09, dave santos <santos137@yahoo.com
          @@attachment@@
        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23983 From: dave santos Date: 10/7/2018
        Subject: Reinhart's Revolutionary SS PG in updated production
        This Ozone SS PG first emerged in 2012 by our talented pal, Reinhart (and friends). Had this wing been a dead end, it would not be in updated production. and recognized as the lightest production aircraft for human flight ever. The major design change in the xxlite2 is adoption of a ram-air LE tube, which had been hoped for as the SS design sweet spot.

        Make no mistake, this minimalist wing has the power-to-weight of a Space-Shuttle engine, but does not burn fuel. A fantastic future awaits insurgent SS kite power technology.

        https://flyozone.com/paragliders/en/products/gliders/xxlite-2/info/
        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23984 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 10/7/2018
        Subject: Re: Fw: Lang's H2 Kiteship Paper
        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23986 From: dave santos Date: 10/7/2018
        Subject: Re: Fw: Lang's H2 Kiteship Paper
        I recall a final formal version of the H2 kiteship paper; the Drachen version was more of a summary/draft that I had not seen. Dave Lang (NASA, Boeing, etc.) was Drachen's "science officer".

        Typical fantastic Drachen Discourse issue; be sure to check out German kite historian Walter Diem on Richard Steiff, with an amazing Roloplan kite arch, and also a short AWE rave by kitegod Joe Hadzicki.
        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23987 From: benhaiemp Date: 10/7/2018
        Subject: Re: AWE where, how?
        A specific way of AWE to solve the wind intensity variations is varying the swept area and/or the altitude of flight in order to deliver a predetermined constant power.


        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23988 From: dave santos Date: 10/7/2018
        Subject: Re: AWE where, how?
        Yes, varying sweep and AoA, along with working favorable parts of the kite window, and using a quiver for wider variations; that's exactly how kite sports are taught, and exactly how AWE kites can be flown as well. These methods apply differently to airborne kite networks, which may be the primary architecture in the future.
        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23990 From: benhaiemp Date: 10/8/2018
        Subject: AWES in forests?

        Using (thin and light) towers as recommended by Florian Bauer on https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-1947-0_18 would be a way (after improvements and adaptations of towers so that they become confused with trees all around) to implement AWES in forests, benefiting from uninhabited zones, from a lesser gravity of crashes which would be confined on the canopy, protecting forests against the excess of deforestation...

        PierreB

        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23991 From: Hardensoft International Limited Date: 10/8/2018
        Subject: Re: Emergent Offshore Industrialization by means of Kites?
        ".... if we seek the wisdom and skills to make it so."
        Best source of wisdom is God and He gives liberally to those who ask Him with faith.
        May He grant true seekers in AWE required wisdom and skills to make it happen much sooner than expected in the name of Jesus. Amen.
        Best Lifts.
        JohnO
        Holy Ghost School Of Prayer and Biblical Leadership
        https://hgsp-bl.simplesite.com


        John Adeoye  Oyebanji   B.Sc. MCPN
        Managing Consultant & CEO
        Hardensoft International Limited
        <Technologies




         

        As our ideas for kiteship energy adoption have proliferated, a new picture emerges of the grand possibilities to host entire industrial supply chains offshore. A partial trend has already been evident in naval fleets and industrial fishing, where a diverse mix of ships contribute to one overall enterprise. Call these methods a sort of shipping internet substantially decoupled from land operations. Ship Kites provide the theoretic energy to sustain vast offshore operations without onshore fuel dependence.

        How might this work someday? Smaller ships from coastal ports could haul scrap metal to smelting superships that ferry to the Southern Ocean, where wind power is greatest. The metal output could be transported to other factory kiteships that make industrial parts, in turn passed to assembly kiteships, and finally to distribution shipping serving coastal ports. There might be major economic and ecological benefits. Land area is relatively scarce, and kite ships can be designed to operate quite slowly and benignly, perhaps even hosting thriving sea-life colonies, like large floating objects at sea naturally do. Ecological services like plastic waste and dead-zone remediation seem possible.

        Perhaps even floating cities will become hubs of true seaborne civilization, by means of kites. The monolithic floating city as originally conceived would give way to a much more mixed super-fleet of specialized shipping to provide every sort of civilizational service. Airborne and underwater kites could be the key to such complex emergent "waterworld" Utopias, not just a way to power any single-output ship process we can think of. Sea level rise could be a primary driver of our return to sea. This may be a basis to sooner colonize the sky by means of kites, with floating rather than grounded anchors.

        Compare such happy musings with petty fears that AWE cannot succeed, based on narrow objections. Lets agree with Wubbo, that we do not face any impossible challenge to engineer the glorious AWE future we want, if we seek the wisdom and skills to make it so.

        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23992 From: benhaiemp Date: 10/8/2018
        Subject: GIEC report
        Attachments :

          GIEC report http://report.ipcc.ch/sr15/pdf/sr15_spm_final.pdf (attachment from page 19/33) recommends increasing nuclear until several times in order to lowering Co² emissions. See also recommendations for increasing renewables and decreasing fossils as expected.

            @@attachment@@
          Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23993 From: dave santos Date: 10/8/2018
          Subject: Return of the tower in AWE? Not so fast...
          The obsolete Springer model of AWE publishing leaves most of us outside their paywall, but from the abstracts we at least see the general ideas. One such idea is that adding towers back into ideal AWE theory might be worthwhile, and PierreB advocates this hope in the AWES Forum. The hope for towers correlates to AWE teams who anyway intend to depend on towers of some sort for launching and landing. Those who want towers are welcomed to develop them, for comparison to towerless AWE.

          The tower problem remains as explored in years past- one cannot build a tower tall enough and cheap enough to help tap FAA determined airspace, our best resource target, at around 500m high. We have fully examined the scaling-law limits behind this conclusion. In the most ideal theory, AWE can eliminate towers rather than require them. How about towers in forests? Healthy forests are usually a patchwork of meadow and wood, either by wildfire or the lifecycle of the largest trees, so the presence of small clearings for AWE is not very unnatural.

          Even so, would towers be the only way to operate kites in dense forest? No; as described in past posts, many other possible methods exist. A kite can be towed up along a road or stream path, or even catapulted ballistically to open like a parachute. A kite can aerotowed to its location. A kite network can be maintained in constant flight by reverse-pumping. And so on. A particular source of confusion is "cosine-loss", as if power-kite angle was itself is a first-order concern. Sure, the cosine-angle can be claimed better by adding the cost of the tower, but is this economics sound? Cosine-loss is such an absurd design factor that one can also dig a pit next to the anchor-point to measure an improvement in cosine-angle.

          Time will tell if towers have any major role in future utility-scale AWE, by true engineering merit, but its not hard to see the known disadvantages. As long as there are developers working to perfect towerless AWE, it will be an interesting contest of engineering philosophy, to watch the best ideas prevail on merits.
          Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23994 From: dave santos Date: 10/8/2018
          Subject: Re: GIEC report [1 Attachment]
          Our strength is to develop AWE, whatever the nuke industry does. Where is the use to us in depending in any way on their policy debate? They do not focus on the kite, after all.
          Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23995 From: benhaiemp Date: 10/8/2018
          Subject: Re: Energy storage conversation
          I have to correct my previous message(s) as for the needs for the wind energy no existing storage or energy product is respectively important quantitatively and/or cheap enough.


          ---In AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com, <pierre-benhaiem@...
          Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23996 From: dave santos Date: 10/8/2018
          Subject: Re: Energy storage conversation
          Peter's idea to compress air to boost gas-turbines is just short of the advanced kite-gas hybrid solution explored here for several years.

          The theoretic ideal is to use AWE directly to turn the same generator shaft as the gas-turbine, so the gas is conserved when the wind blows, Natural gas is already a standard storage medium, so 100% capacity factor is achievable by a kite-gas hybrid. No need for massive air-compression, recovered heat-of-compression, ammonia, batteries, hydrogen, etc. Gas is favored for hybrid use, since it reacts to load demand faster than coal steam turbines.

          The other best-AWE storage idea, in my opinion, is subtle use of elastic energy and potential energy of mass x altitude to help match demand and level uneven output. All other storage media will fight it out in the market, for AWE to charge anything that wins. I have already stored AWE usefully when charging my phone with KiteSat at the beach. When an airplane taps tailwinds, the conserved fuel remains stored. The "cost of storage" in these real cases is not too much.
          Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23997 From: dougselsam Date: 10/8/2018
          Subject: Re: AWE where, how?

          So the paper is:

          Crosswind Kite Power with Tower

          Typically, wind energy "inventors" - the few who don't just give up, end up heading toward the standard wind turbine design, in all its boring details.  Like so many things in life, some people listen to the experts right away, while others insist on learning everything the hard way. Before long they'll figure out how to get their blades to travel in a circle, without a computer or any extra people.
          Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23998 From: dougselsam Date: 10/8/2018
          Subject: Re: Spanish windmills going Airborne - Now what, Don Quijote?
          Chris:
          I give that project an A.
          Flatten the blade pitch to maybe 4 degrees or less, if you want it to really take off, although it may also rip itself apart if it spins too fast.  Try any flatter pitch angle, and I think you'll be surprised. 
          Say, how did you get your wings to travel in a circle without using a computer?  Boy that's clever.  Who would have thought?  How many programmers were working on this project?  How many interns?  How many grad students?  How many employees?  Which big corporation funded this?  How many million dollars did you have to raise?  I notice it only takes one person to launch, with no fanfare, emotional music, or special effects required - just another day at the office. That seems too easy.  Isn't AWE supposed to be difficult?  Complicated?  Kidding.  Excellent work.  What would you say is the next step?  I am always thinking of moving to Spain or Portugal.  Well, someday.  Y habla la bla-blah, tambien.  Looks a lot like this high desert here in Southern California.  I've read it was much greener there 1000 years ago til it got overgrazed and all the forests cut down. :)  DougS.
          Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 23999 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 10/8/2018
          Subject: Re: Spanish windmills going Airborne - Now what, Don Quijote?
          Very nice! Congratulations!

          Maybe you have considered having the torsion branch rods be shaped wind impellers.
          Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 24000 From: benhaiemp Date: 10/8/2018
          Subject: Re: Spanish windmills going Airborne - Now what, Don Quijote?

          Hi Christof,


          Great job, beautiful video, congratulations.


          Best,


          PierreB


           
          Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 24001 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 10/8/2018
          Subject: Water launch at its fullest in kitefoiling
          Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 24002 From: dave santos Date: 10/8/2018
          Subject: Re: Emergent Offshore Industrialization by means of Kites?
          Thank you, JohnO, for all your faith.

          AWE promises to be the answer to many prayers; like the sun, its a gift from heaven. The revolution can unfold very quickly once the way is sufficiently prepared.

          daveS
          Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 24003 From: dave santos Date: 10/8/2018
          Subject: Re: Water launch at its fullest in kitefoiling
          Fantastic progress in kiteboarding; not just the foil-board, but full wet-launch by parafoil. Who invented this new capability? An LEI is pumped up on shore, and is not as good a wing. Note that PL and Flysurfer have long done water parafoils, but I have not seen full wet-launch before.

          Note also the power of human kite skill to make such magic real; no kite automation basis even comes close. This is real AWE, if not yet at civilization-scale.
          Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 24004 From: dave santos Date: 10/8/2018
          Subject: more kite golden-age man-lifting history
          We have reviewed much of this "lost" history before, but always more sources surface. Here Baden Powell goes into great detail over his man-lifting developmental history (recalling other accounts he wrote) and we find out more about Lamson's obscure human flights. In other searching, there are a few more not too remarkable modern kite hobbyist cases, and also the colorful mid 20th century hoax of a Tibetan man-lifting kite tradition. Towed HG/PG launch is pretty much the current state-of-the-art, now quite common.


          The War Kite

          By Captain R. Baden-Powell

          www.digitalhistoryproject.com/2012/05/war-kite.html

          ============

          Charles H. Lamson’s Aerial Experiments – 1896-97

          https://www.newenglandaviationhistory.com/tag/human-lifting-kites/


          I am hoping to find time and help to finally human flight-test kPower's rerigged 132m2 lifting arch on the Texas coast, having been preoccupied with urgent non-kite work too long.
          Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 24005 From: Peter A. Sharp Date: 10/9/2018
          Subject: Re: Energy storage conversation
          Attachments :

            Hi DaveS,

                      Since you have explored the idea for years, please explain to me the details of how to couple 100 long pull kites to the generator of a gas turbines so as to maintain the necessary precise frequency required for the AC grid.

                      I ask because something I want to build is a number of Bird Windmills all spinning the same generator shaft via jerker lines and one-way clutches on the shaft of the single generator. But I don’t know how to couple the same generator to a gas turbine (unless perhaps, it is a DC generator that does not require a precise frequency to be maintained). So please tell me how to do it.

                      It is relatively easy to control the feeding of compressed air into a gas turbine to maintain frequency precision, but it seems quite difficult to control a highly variable mechanical input in the same way. What is your method?

            PeterS

             

            From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
            Sent: Monday, October 08, 2018 3:15 PM
            To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
            Subject: Re: [AWES] Re: Energy storage conversation

             

             

            Peter's idea to compress air to boost gas-turbines is just short of the advanced kite-gas hybrid solution explored here for several years.

            The theoretic ideal is to use AWE directly to turn the same generator shaft as the gas-turbine, so the gas is conserved when the wind blows, Natural gas is already a standard storage medium, so 100% capacity factor is achievable by a kite-gas hybrid. No need for massive air-compression, recovered heat-of-compression, ammonia, batteries, hydrogen, etc. Gas is favored for hybrid use, since it reacts to load demand faster than coal steam turbines.

            The other best-AWE storage idea, in my opinion, is subtle use of elastic energy and potential energy of mass x altitude to help match demand and level uneven output. All other storage media will fight it out in the market, for AWE to charge anything that wins. I have already stored AWE usefully when charging my phone with KiteSat at the beach. When an airplane taps tailwinds, the conserved fuel remains stored. The "cost of storage" in these real cases is not too much.

            Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 24006 From: dave santos Date: 10/9/2018
            Subject: Re: Energy storage conversation
            PeterS,

            The kite/gas-turbine hybrid plant concept is simple, but full details emerged one by one, in hundreds of messages over the years.

            A grid generator shaft is the shared mechanical input of the gas-turbine and kite array (one unit-kite is too weak). Each shaft input channel has an over-running clutch. Either input can dominate, or they can mix. The requirement is to match load demand smoothly from both sources of power. This is the same logic as tandem cyclists keeping a constant velocity in varied terrain while alternating or mixing their efforts.

            As designers, we rely on typical gas turbine startup and throttling specs and load demand statistics. Our job is to have the kite farm use every practical variable to match up. We rely on "rope-driving" cables just like cable car systems are aggregated to single power stations. Its all rather simple in principle, based only on proven elements. Existing grid infrastructure is leveraged with minimal added investment.

            Sample detail- Generators already have over-running clutches, for their start-up motors, to enable easy AWE conversion, although the idled turbine would be dragging, and could simply be vacuum pumped. To many details to repeat here, but all archived,

            daveS
            Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 24007 From: dave santos Date: 10/9/2018
            Subject: Review of Kite/Gas-Turbine Hybrid Concept (redirected topic)
            Redirecting discussion to new topic from "storage". Please reply on-topic here.

            ===========

            The kite/gas-turbine hybrid plant concept is now simple to summarize, but full details only emerged slowly, in hundreds of messages over the years. In review-

            A grid generator shaft is the shared mechanical input of the gas-turbine and kite array (one unit-kite is too weak). Each shaft input channel has an over-running clutch. Either input can dominate, or they can mix. The requirement is to match load demand smoothly from both sources of power. This is the same ME logic as tandem cyclists keeping a constant velocity in varied terrain while alternating or mixing their efforts.

            As AWES designers, we rely on typical gas turbine startup and throttling specs and load demand statistics. Our focus is to have the kite farm use every practical variable to match its demand. We rely on "rope-driving" cables just like cable car systems are aggregated to single power stations. Its all rather simple in principle, based only on proven elements. Existing grid infrastructure is leveraged, with minimal added investment.

            Sample detail- Generators already have over-running clutches, for their start-up motors, to enable easy AWE conversion. Although the idled turbine would be dragging, and could simply be vacuum pumped. To many details to repeat here, but all archived in the Open-AWE_IP-Cloud