Messages in AirborneWindEnergy group.                          AWES2183to2232 Page 24 of 79.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2183 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/15/2010
Subject: Re: Peristent Tether-Driven Flight

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2184 From: dave santos Date: 9/15/2010
Subject: Re: Cubic Scaling Penalty of Torsion Tubes (repeated material)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2185 From: dave santos Date: 9/15/2010
Subject: Re: Peristent Tether-Driven Flight

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2186 From: dave santos Date: 9/15/2010
Subject: Re: Manual flygen (Bravo)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2187 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/15/2010
Subject: Rotokite reel-in-out method

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2188 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/16/2010
Subject: CUV

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2189 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/16/2010
Subject: GPS Pseudolites

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2190 From: Bob Stuart Date: 9/16/2010
Subject: Re: GPS Pseudolites

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2191 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/16/2010
Subject: Re: GPS Pseudolites

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2192 From: dave santos Date: 9/16/2010
Subject: Re: GPS Pseudolites

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2193 From: dave santos Date: 9/17/2010
Subject: AWE Investment Reports

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2194 From: Doug Date: 9/18/2010
Subject: Re: AWE Investment Reports

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2195 From: dave santos Date: 9/18/2010
Subject: Re: AWE Investment Reports

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2196 From: Doug Date: 9/19/2010
Subject: Re: AWE Investment Reports

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2197 From: Pierre Benhaiem Date: 9/19/2010
Subject: After World Energy Congress in Montreal

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2198 From: Doug Date: 9/20/2010
Subject: Re: After World Energy Congress in Montreal

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2199 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 9/20/2010
Subject: Re: After World Energy Congress in Montreal

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2200 From: dave santos Date: 9/20/2010
Subject: Self-Lifting Tethers for High-Altitude Apps

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2201 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/20/2010
Subject: How very close: Thomas A. Edison, today 100 years ago

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2202 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/21/2010
Subject: Uwe Ahrens

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2203 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/21/2010
Subject: Welcome to Manfred Franetzki

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2204 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 9/21/2010
Subject: Re: How very close: Thomas A. Edison, today 100 years ago

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2205 From: dave santos Date: 9/22/2010
Subject: Inside AWEC2010 & the AWE Consortium

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2206 From: dave santos Date: 9/23/2010
Subject: AWEC Malfeasance Complaint

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2207 From: spacecannon@san.rr.com Date: 9/23/2010
Subject: Re: AWEC Malfeasance Complaint

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2208 From: Doug Date: 9/24/2010
Subject: Re: AWEC Malfeasance Complaint

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2209 From: dave santos Date: 9/24/2010
Subject: Bas Lansdorp for AWEC President

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2210 From: dave santos Date: 9/24/2010
Subject: Re: AWEC Malfeasance Complaint

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2211 From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com Date: 9/24/2010
Subject: New file uploaded to AirborneWindEnergy

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2212 From: Doug Date: 9/25/2010
Subject: Re: Bas Lansdorp for AWEC President

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2213 From: dave santos Date: 9/25/2010
Subject: Breaking Gravity-Waves in the Surface Boundary Layer

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2214 From: dave santos Date: 9/25/2010
Subject: Re: Bas Lansdorp for AWEC President

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2215 From: pjskywindpower Date: 9/25/2010
Subject: Re: AWE Peace Only ...say your stand here.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2216 From: Bob Stuart Date: 9/26/2010
Subject: Re: I NEED YOUR VOTE - GE Ecomagination

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2217 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/26/2010
Subject: KITE

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2218 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/26/2010
Subject: Model?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2219 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/26/2010
Subject: Re: Breaking Gravity-Waves in the Surface Boundary Layer

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2220 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/26/2010
Subject: Re: AWE Peace Only ...say your stand here.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2221 From: Doug Date: 9/27/2010
Subject: Re: Model?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2222 From: Pierre Benhaiem Date: 9/27/2010
Subject: Last votes

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2223 From: dave santos Date: 9/27/2010
Subject: Re: Model?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2224 From: dave santos Date: 9/27/2010
Subject: Enhanced Membrane Wing-Mill

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2225 From: dave santos Date: 9/27/2010
Subject: VariDelta- Variable Drag Delta-Kite

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2226 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/28/2010
Subject: Re: CMNA Power: The "Texas School" of AWE

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2227 From: Doug Date: 9/28/2010
Subject: Re: Model?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2228 From: dave santos Date: 9/28/2010
Subject: Re: Model?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2229 From: Secretariat, Airborne Wind Energy Industr Date: 9/28/2010
Subject: ECOMAGINATION CHALLENGE - An AWEIA Entry

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2230 From: Secretariat, Airborne Wind Energy Industr Date: 9/28/2010
Subject: ECOMAGINATION CHALLENGE - An AWEIA Entry

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2231 From: Bob Stuart Date: 9/28/2010
Subject: ECOMAGINATION CHALLENGE - An AWEIA Entry

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2232 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 9/28/2010
Subject: Re: ECOMAGINATION CHALLENGE - An AWEIA Entry




Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2183 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/15/2010
Subject: Re: Peristent Tether-Driven Flight

Does the following fit this thread?  Click through image for full instruction:

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2184 From: dave santos Date: 9/15/2010
Subject: Re: Cubic Scaling Penalty of Torsion Tubes (repeated material)
Doug,
 
Perhaps you missed the old posts explaining that a high-speed cable loop with a given "static" pull carries far more energy over time than a slow speed loop of the same pull. The colorful example is that "sewing thread" moving at 200mph rates near a horsepower. Yes, its tricky to handle line like this, you need shock-absorbing & tensioning mechanisms, but the power is there for the new helicopter to overcome static pull from below.
 
Not all designs suffer the Cubic Scaling Penalty equally. String & membrane are quasi one & two dimensional objects & postpone the penalty. Adding a mere 1/100 of an inch in thickness to a 1/100 of an inch thick membrane doubles its weight. KiteShip succeeded in making ~5000sq ft kites rated at about a megawatt with the same thin fabric a small kite is made from. A stiff tube, on the other hand, is fully 3D & in scaling-up, to maintain stiffness ratio, soon becomes massive. This is why i could only find massive long driveshafts, requiring close-spaced bushings, in the engineering universe (ship drive-shafts & dam spillway actuators).
 
Small developers like us should band together to out-compete the early VC bets, especially for a much-needed major comparative study to vett ideas, & go with the identified winners. If USWindLabs shines in that pool it would then easily out-compete any well-funded over-hyped vanity-engineering start.
 
I do have a sense of humor, anything not tragic is hilarious,
 
dave


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2185 From: dave santos Date: 9/15/2010
Subject: Re: Peristent Tether-Driven Flight
An amazing thing about this design is the fine solution to launching & landing a high-speed glider from a turret.
 
As now applied to AWE, its a nice little bit of cool IP, Joe.
 
====================================
 
Note: "CoolIP" is a catch-all for shared AWE knowledge (fairIP/coopIP) that combines high open-source freedom with "honor-system" consideration for the creators, as that knowledge proves commercially valuable to big business. It is a work-around to the "broken" global patent system, for small inventors. The AWE Consortium has been challenged in writing to accept cool/fair/coop AWE IP, but has not yet responded. It will be very hard for AWE companies to comepletely avoid the many good ideas gathered under the CoolIP banner. AWEIA is proposed to arbitrate eventual fairness disputes related to the new IP vehicle.
 


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2186 From: dave santos Date: 9/15/2010
Subject: Re: Manual flygen (Bravo)
Pierre,
 
Bravo for a nice simple experiment with good support analysis. It fills a gap in the spectrum of demos between KileLab's "plodding low-tech" flygen turbine hung under a lifter & the small fast complex rigid-wing flygens by Joby & Makani.
 
Consider flying your parafoil flygen thru a ring held up by a pilot-kite's line, if crashing is a problem. Its possible to attach a pilot-kite on a long leader to a parafoil wing-tip, with swivels & rotary-contacts added where required, & let the flygen loop passively. You can also stake-apart the two lines & set up fairly stable dutch-roll oscillations.
 
Hope your presentation at the "world congress" went well,
 
dave
 



Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2187 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/15/2010
Subject: Rotokite reel-in-out method
  • Rotokite  (non-crosswinding)
  • Basic reel-in-out with and without crosswinding for power generation is in public domain. Which aircraft is used to attain AWECS is a competitive situation presently. Use of rotary aircraft (powerable, unpowerable, strictly unpowered, etc.) to achieve the generation is an exciting field.    Distinguish flygens form groundgen on this matter.   And distinguish whether the system allows crosswinding or not during the power-gain reel-out opeation sector.
  • Related would be the many patents on kites. Most any kite could become part of a reel-in-out scheme.  Effective bladed or sailed rotary kites with or without lifter kites or kytoons play to bring a wide selection of exploration.

The general AWECS classification challenge remains open for description.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2188 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/16/2010
Subject: CUV
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2189 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/16/2010
Subject: GPS Pseudolites

Dissertation in 1997:

GPS Pseudolites ,
Theory, Design, and Applications
by H. Stewart Cobb

===========================

Advanced AWECS farm control?

 

 

 

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2190 From: Bob Stuart Date: 9/16/2010
Subject: Re: GPS Pseudolites
This term seems to refer to a miniature, local GPS system to determine kite position.

This is not as funny as any of the other possibilities that came to mind.

Bob

On 16-Sep-10, at 8:25 AM, Joe Faust wrote:


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2191 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/16/2010
Subject: Re: GPS Pseudolites
"Any vehicle which requires centimeter-accurate navigation within a sphere of 20 km radius or less can now achieve it using CDGPS navigation assisted by pseudolites."
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2192 From: dave santos Date: 9/16/2010
Subject: Re: GPS Pseudolites
GPS is attractive for obvious reasons, but there are problems.
 
Avoidable expense & complexity are major issues. There are weight & power penalties in carrying a lot of avionics. Both direct physical risk & hidden business risk lurks in specifying "whiz-bang". The list of common failure modes is long; condensation (esp. salt-fog) & thermal cycling, vibration, RF interference, etc..
 
Never-mind lightning, GPS is easily jammed- GPS Jamming
 
When an aircraft dependent on such systems crashes it can be almost impossible to determine what went wrong. Looping kiteplanes pulling hundreds-of-thousands of +10G cycles fatigue cycle circuit-boards, wiring & connectors. Crash wreckage might not reveal if this was the fatal factor, or maybe some deep software bug.
 
Clearly development & validation of AWE dependent on GPS & similar high-tech will be delayed by years compared to the simpler solutions. KiteLab favors self-stable multi-line constrained AWECS flight. If you must have close monitoring, ground-based radar with backup to monitor an AWE array, as well as local air traffic, is nearly ideal. A least a five year market window before GPS dependent competitors can earn airworthiness certification is expected.
 
All these issues apply to pseudolites as well.
 
 
 
 
 

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2193 From: dave santos Date: 9/17/2010
Subject: AWE Investment Reports
The AWE Industry is entering a new phase as major venture capital investors line up at the buffet of start-ups. While the investments so far have been "small", single & low double digit millions, billions in known venture capital funds are actively studying the field.
 
The AWE Consortium has effectively courted these new players & the upcoming conference (AWEC2010) has pretty much been turned over to the "green-greed" crowd. The keynote will be delivered by a venture lawyer, not anyone knowledgeable in the field.
 
Investors face considerable risk in picking winners. AWEC has encouraged an atmosphere of hyped & even fraudulent claims by its members with its stealthy see-no-evil pay-to-play dynamic. The investors need to hear all sides of the technical debates over AWE best prospects & practice. The worst of the false & misleading advertising needs to be debunked. Undervalued alternatives to AWEC's overvalued technology need to be presented.
 
KiteLab Group undertakes to expertly inform the AWE investor pool on these issues by compiling periodic high-profile AWE Investment Reports. The goal is to prevent over-investment in poor bets & promote early modest investment in indentifying & validating the soundest concepts. Massive investment will follow. Please provide input on any side of an investment issue.
 
 
 

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2194 From: Doug Date: 9/18/2010
Subject: Re: AWE Investment Reports
Dave S:
With all due respect, at least one venture outfit, Google Ventures, disagrees. Here is the e-mail I received back from them the other day after I talked to the Google people on recommendation of Eric Schmidt CEO of Google, after he saw my package.

Ironically, I was not even really trying to sell them on my airborne stuff. Superturbine(R) has the potential to cut the cost of terrestrially-based wind energy in half anyway - the airborne aspect is just the high-risk/high-reward aspect of Superturbine(R), not the whole package.

It just goes to show that there is really no way to penetrate the wall of non-comprehension other than to create it so that nobody can deny it. Luckily it cone be done on a shoestring anyway - it doesn't require that much money! Text of Google Ventures e-mail below - read and take heed:

Doug,

Thanks for reaching out. As you may have heard Google.org is no longer making venture capital investments. Instead that function has been transitioned to Google Ventures, which has a slightly different mandate. I was able to review the material you send and I must say that your ideas are certainly unique and prolific. I was quite impressed with the Popular Science article and the prototype you created. Unfortunately, however, the risk profile does not fit well with the Google Ventures portfolio. While Google Ventures will occasionally take opportunistic positions in late stage cleantech endeavors such as Silver Spring Networks, the combination of early stage and high capital intensity pushes the Superturbine out of our comfort zone.

As you may have discovered many venture capital firms have adopted a similar position when it comes to airborne wind technologies. In my experience the space is better suited to investment from high net worth individuals, who can afford a longer time horizon. Given your relationship with Messeurs Gates and Schmidt it seems you are already in contact with the right type of people. We do wish you the best of luck in your efforts to help solve our country's energy problem.

Kind regards,
Ken


Kenneth Davies
Program Manager, Energy & Infrastructure
Cleantech Advisor, Google Ventures
Google, Inc.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2195 From: dave santos Date: 9/18/2010
Subject: Re: AWE Investment Reports
Doug,
 
I don't see any particular disagreement between the letter you got & the need for informed investment. Ken is right about those high net-worth investors & they need good info too.
 
You might do even better with the Bills & Erics pitching a diversified AWE R & D investment, for a lowered "risk profile". Betting on one idea at this stage is very risky,
 
dave santos
 
AWE Investment Advisor
 
 


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2196 From: Doug Date: 9/19/2010
Subject: Re: AWE Investment Reports
I'd place it all in "talking to a wall" territory.
It seems that anything worth investing in seems "too good to be true", or else they don't really have time to look at what you put in front of them. This is a typical example. Exactly as you say, Superturbine(R) a package of related technologies that includes a world IP package that has already cost nearly a half million dollars.

It shows the capability to possibly cut the cost of utility-scale wind energy in half. One could ignore the airborne aspect and it's a great revolution already. No matter - nobody cares. The visionaries are blind. Nobody cares about it till they see their neighbor having a zero electric bill, or see someone making millions of dollars. Then suddenly after it;s all worked out, they'll offer to come in and play some "indispensible" role.


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2197 From: Pierre Benhaiem Date: 9/19/2010
Subject: After World Energy Congress in Montreal
It was very interesting:the greatest experts,the greatest companies,the greatest scientifics in the world of all energies.
 
I made the maximum to spread the idea of High Altitude Wind Energy and also the method of kite system for harnessing it,in my conference but also during answer-reply seance at the end of 2 or 3 plenary sessions.
 
Some of these leading experts judged this (HAWE) relevant idea,but HAWE has no legal existence for the official projections towards the future,the most HAWE being the top of the highest existing wind turbines from now towards 2050.
 
So it will be necessary that AWECS companies and experts in HAWE made presentations at the next World Energy Congress which will be held in Daegu City in the Republic of Korea,2013.
Now the ground begins to be cleared.
 
Naturally conversion systems were not analyzed yet.
 
Powerpoint presentation and paper will be available at Secretariat of Congress.
 
And also:my vote for Doug,Kitegen,Joinckim for Ecomagination,
and thanks for DaveS 'message and John's vote.
 
PierreB
 
 
 
 
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2198 From: Doug Date: 9/20/2010
Subject: Re: After World Energy Congress in Montreal
Pierre: Thanks for your vote.
you just said it all: The "Greatest Experts, the Scientific Minds"...
or are they?
If they are so great, so expert, so scintific, and let's say High Altitude Wind POwer or even Airborne Wind Energy takes a significant position, then they will turn out to have been ignorant and blind.
You know what I wonder?
For 3 years now the "climate experts" have been using warnings of severe hurricane seasons as examples of their accuracy in predicting the weather, at least at a crude scale.
Only thing is: almost no hurricanes for year.
Even Al Gore used Katrina as an example of "the new normal" cause by us burning things.
Well I can tell you the water in the Pacific has been too cold to surf all summer, and that is the multi-decadal oscillation at work.
We're heading into a La Nina. It will be a cold winter with little snow here.
Here's my question:
If it gets colder again for a few decades, will a concensus of scientists resign as useless and inaccurate, admitting that for them, "science" is a supermarket tabloid exercise in going along to get along, not fact-based?
He he he he
I'll be at the AWE Conference at Stanford if anyone else will be there.
I'll have free T-shirts with my patent claims for buoyant blades, and pix from my patents of flying wind turbines, buoyant and gyrocopter style, printed on them. And cool logos for Selsam, USWINDLABS and Superturbine(R).
Come and get a free T-shirt.
:)
Doug Selsam
714-992-5594


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2199 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 9/20/2010
Subject: Re: After World Energy Congress in Montreal
Doug,

It is not a specialized Congress in AWECS or HAWE but a multi-energy forum.Some of theese experts approve the idea of harnessing HAWE but HAWE has not yet a valid passport in this Congress.I hope to have done that it is possible for a good photo the next Congress will can place on HAWE and AWECS passport.And I do not tell that it is a right and correct thing that official projections towards 2050 for wind energy consider only conventional wind turbines but it is a simple constatation.Note:for the official projection the expert is not the experts who approve (unofficially) the "idea" of harnessing HAWE.

Pierre
   




Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2200 From: dave santos Date: 9/20/2010
Subject: Self-Lifting Tethers for High-Altitude Apps
Dave Culp has long had a pet idea of "flying-rope" as consisting of many tiny kites strung along a line. Just toss it out in wind to fly it. McNaghten calculated that stratospheric kites will too-easily have miles of tether lay on the ground in weak wind. The problem is that long "bare" tethers accumulate weight, drag, & negative-lift as tremendous down-force. KiteLab found empirically that even high-speed reeling might not keep up with the characterisitc "slight-slack/sudden-sag" effect. Lang saw the effect in simlulation.
 
Why not put lifting kites all along a high-altitude tether? Call it a kite stack or train, its really just a macro version of Culp's winged rope. Sudden-sag would be slowed by lift & aero-resistance all along the line. Optimal high-altitude kitefarms may take form as fuzzy-looking latticeworks of self-lifted lines covered with kites.
 
Existing absolute kite altitude records are held by (sparse) trains, not single kites, showing an advantage for multiplied lift. There are handling trade-offs to Self-Lifting Tethers, but the good news is that the method offers hope for eventual high-altitude AWE & related aviation.
 
coolIP

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2201 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/20/2010
Subject: How very close: Thomas A. Edison, today 100 years ago

Carousel method closeness ...approved this day 100 years ago on Sept. 20, 1910:

US Pat. 970616    Click image for full instruction.  Then just think in reverse.

 

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2202 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/21/2010
Subject: Uwe Ahrens

Welcome to

 Uwe Ahrens.

http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?WO=2008006413  for full applicaton documents including drawings.

Wind operated power generator

NTS Energie- und Transportsysteme GmbH  
 NTS Energy & Transports  

Berlin.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2203 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/21/2010
Subject: Welcome to Manfred Franetzki
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2204 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 9/21/2010
Subject: Re: How very close: Thomas A. Edison, today 100 years ago

Thomas A. Edison:more than 1000 patents or inventions!

PierreB



Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2205 From: dave santos Date: 9/22/2010
Subject: Inside AWEC2010 & the AWE Consortium
Its been an opaque mystery how the AWE Consortium (AWEC) came into being & how it is run, but this much is known. Following HAWPCON09, the open industry association development process moderated by Roger Cutler was discarded in a back-room collusion between a handful of California AWE companies, particularly Joby Energy & Makani Power. They created a "mutual benefit" California corporation, rather than the public benefit entity originally proposed & set out to claim "unified" industry leadership.
 
AWEC2010 was announced, with every detail favoring Awe Consortium insiders. Drachen Foundation's planned event, the Kite Energy Symposium, was simply shoved aside with no consideration by AWEC2010 planners.
 
How did this year's conference come to cost over 600% more than last year's? The organizers claim its because Butte County subsidized HAWPCON09, but his hardly rings true while they brag 50 million in capitalization. These are the folks that claim they can deliver AWE "cheaper than coal" while doing R & D in destinations like Maui. 
 
The conference will not cost them like those who meekly pay full price. AWEC "Diamond Members" easily make back AWEC "dues" in kick-back perks like 12 free conference passes (a 10,000 dollar "value"), friendly speaker packing, & prime display space. The full admission dupes further subsidise the lavish advantages of the AWE Consortium elite.
 
Expect the marketing hype to rule at AWEC2010. What you won't find at the conference is featured participation by any "low-complexity" AWE developers. Such solutions are far closer to helping the world, but thats not the point of AWEC, which is to help itself.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2206 From: dave santos Date: 9/23/2010
Subject: AWEC Malfeasance Complaint
Its upsetting to learn that most AWE companies were summarily excluded from any participation in the industry association process hijacked by AWEC's "founding circle". The HAWPCON09 moderator of the industry association development process, & all participants, had a clear duty to operate openly & democratically. The moderator instead allowed a small clique of AWEC insiders to privately rig the system to suit themselves, while accepting an executive director title. This was malfeasance by collusion. Anti-competitive ethics & law are pertinent.
 
KiteLab Group is one of the wrongfully excluded outfits. Several others confirm being left in the dark. AWEC's out-of-control conference costs predictably priced out worthy small AWE enterprises (Drachen Foundation's displaced event would have been affordable). Limiting access to vital information & key investors are also terrible outcomes.
 
If you were a known AWE industry member who was allowed no input in the AWEC-dominated process & feel harmed by any of the executive actions, please join the complaint now. Investors are also potentially harmed by AWEC's exclusions.
 
A formal lawsuit can be prevented by AWEC taking prompt corrective actions, including a "class action" settlement to be distributed among plaintiffs. Creating an open research fund for small biz AWE to apply for would also mitigate harm done by capital-elite AWEC insiders. A call for resignation of the culpable should follow any shortcoming in reform & redress.
 
A reformed AWEC can still be a good industry leader. Given a level playing field, with transparent & accountable leadership, the best AWE solutions will sooner prevail.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2207 From: spacecannon@san.rr.com Date: 9/23/2010
Subject: Re: AWEC Malfeasance Complaint
Go for it. The wording is crucial to be successful in a claim of this sort, pour over all of their press releases and brochures, to find claims that are worthy of litigation. You need better grounds and writen proof.


---- dave santos <santos137@yahoo.com
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2208 From: Doug Date: 9/24/2010
Subject: Re: AWEC Malfeasance Complaint
Dave:
Let me tell you from experience: you are getting all worked up over nothing. Conferences are nothing but "the all-talk format" on steroids. In this case it is groups of people who sit around and do nothingh individually, forming groups that ist around together and do nothing, all having a conference where all the groups can get together and all sit together in a big room and REALLY do nothing, but more talk-talk-talk.
Nothing at the conference will make a good idea not work, or a bad idea work. Nothing will advance this field but working models for sale that are proven and can be relied upon to provide economical power.
If that;s not what you have, then it needs work to get it to that point.
I only VERY RELUCTANTLY attend these conferences anymore, since, as I've pointed out, all conferences are really just one more chance to sit doing nothing whil a (nice enough) guy named Ira Ehrenpreis speaks, everyone hopes he wioll give them money, he doesn't, and when you go home you missed out on a week of progress, while spending a thousand bucks on the conference lodging and transportation.
If anything actually happened there that affected you, I'd be real surprised.
I've been promoting advanced wind energy technology for years now and manufacture and sell working wind turbines. Even then, your work has just begun. Getting frustrated at the conferece level - at the "all-talk" stage is not worth getting your blood pressure elevated.
If anything significant happens at this shindig, I will be happy to at least informally represent this group and report back on what transpired that may affest us all.
Most likely I will return with disappointing yet hopefully humorous anecdotes 4 U!
Doug Selsam
http://www.TheSolutionToTheEnergyCrisis.com

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2209 From: dave santos Date: 9/24/2010
Subject: Bas Lansdorp for AWEC President
It has been said that however screwed up AWEC is, the industry needs some continuity rather than a total meltdown. One way to correct AWEC's illegitimate dealings without killing the association is bring in new leadership. AWEC has been run as a Silicon Valley Mafia to the detriment of the rest of the world, especially the many fine EU starts.
 
AWEC has a well-respected EU member, Ampyx, that clearly was unaware of AWEC's deep flaws when it recently joined. Had it been fully informed it likely would have stayed out. Its major Norwegian investor, StatKraft, brings with it the moral obligation to comply with the strictest laws in the world for truth-in-advertising. These standards would be a fantastic improvement over AWEC's hyped-publicity culture. Ampyx might in fact be obligated to leave AWEC, under StatKraft's duty to Norwegian law, if no reform occurs.
 
Ampyx is led by Bas Lansdorp, who has a solid background with TU Delft's AWE program. Ampyx's core technology is a good compromise of a hot kiteplane with ground generation, unlike the risky flygen bias of the old AWEC clique. Bas would surely foster a more inclusive research agenda, with far better integration of academia, small AWE stakeholders, & AWEIA. There would be less stealth & pay-to-play & more knowledge-sharing. AWEC's current shameless "green greed" vibe would tip toward energy equity for all.
 
Lets hope the AWEC board will promptly transition to better trusted & respected leadership, so the complaints can rest. JoeBen Bevirt should take responsibility for his shocking conflicts-of-interest & leadership mistakes by resigning. As long as there is a crying need for new energy the industry must be highly inclusive with fewer barriers to entry. Bas looks like the best chance to steer AWEC toward a better outcome.
 
 

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2210 From: dave santos Date: 9/24/2010
Subject: Re: AWEC Malfeasance Complaint
Doug,
 
Be very clear on this- i don't want to attend these events to attract money, but to meet a few fine people, learn something, & share as mcuh as i can. Its knowledge starvation i'm complaining about, not capital starvation, which also exists.
 
If AWEC manages at least to share knowledge in proper conference "proceedings" & also share participation lists, i'll be content. Sorry you had to give those folks your money, they don't deserve it. It would be unbearable to give over any of KiteLab's modest research budget to these over-valued insiders,
 
dave


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2211 From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com Date: 9/24/2010
Subject: New file uploaded to AirborneWindEnergy
Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the AirborneWindEnergy
group.

File : /AWEIA/The ConstructionAndFlyingOfKites1909Miller.pdf
Uploaded by : joe_f_90032 <joefaust333@gmail.com Description :

You can access this file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AirborneWindEnergy/files/AWEIA/The%20ConstructionAndFlyingOfKites1909Miller.pdf

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/members/forms/general.htmlfiles

Regards,

joe_f_90032 <joefaust333@gmail.com
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2212 From: Doug Date: 9/25/2010
Subject: Re: Bas Lansdorp for AWEC President
wooo, another company pretending the answer is not clearly delineated in U.S. Patent 6616402.
Why did I spend so much time carefully spelling out how to do AWE with over 100 drawings?
As I like to say, "How many "experts" does it take to completely ignore major breakthroughs like Superturbine(R)?" answer: "All of them!"
It's a case of infinite density - not good for AWE!
Maybe I can wake them up.
Doug Selsam
http://www.TheSolutionToTheEnergyCrisis.com

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2213 From: dave santos Date: 9/25/2010
Subject: Breaking Gravity-Waves in the Surface Boundary Layer
 
Not too long ago atmospheric scientists only suspected giant breaking gravity-waves observed roiling the upper troposphere to mesosphere region were ubiquitous down to small scales.
 
KiteLab Illwaco has repeatedly observed kite perturbation in the surface boundary layer that can only be explained by low altitude breaking of "microscale" gravity waves. The signature of these events is a sort of sudden washing-machine tumbling of the wind compared to the gentler bobbing/weaving action of normal wave helicity. These events are so common anywhere that no persistent kite escapes them. Some locations with certain terrain features experience them constantly when conditions are ripe.
 
It may be that kite crashes are unavoidable at low altitude & only soft kites, which routinely survive crashing, are practical low for the time being. Fast kiteplanes do punch thru most turbulence, but eventually, a bad roll-of-the-dice couples into the hidden instabilities of low-altitude aerobatic flight & a crash must occur. Aggressive actuation & good self-recovering stability are partial counter-measures. No existing sensor/processing technology images this hazard in real-time.
 
Its funny if only KiteLab's model of kite piloting/automation accounts for this danger. Here is some beautiful simulation of breaking gravity-waves-
 
 
 

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2214 From: dave santos Date: 9/25/2010
Subject: Re: Bas Lansdorp for AWEC President
Doug,
 
Please stop turning other folks threads into repetitive SuperTurbine promotion. This thread is about the political leadership of our industry. Admit at least that Ampyx shows a more open mind about non-SuperTurbine solutions.
 
If we get leaders that can create a sound comparative research framework, then your SuperTurbine claims can be fairly tested alongside all contenders. No one should trust any claim to superiority (including KiteLab's) until that due diligence is done.
 
Treat the AWE field fairly & you might get elected our president,
 
daveS
 



Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2215 From: pjskywindpower Date: 9/25/2010
Subject: Re: AWE Peace Only ...say your stand here.
--- In AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com, "Joe Faust" <joefaust333@... It would be illuminating if all of the information sources for the "militarization" claims being made about ARPA-E and a number of companies involved in designing AWECs were cited so that it could become apparent where so much inaccurate information originated.
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2216 From: Bob Stuart Date: 9/26/2010
Subject: Re: I NEED YOUR VOTE - GE Ecomagination
Hi Folks,

After observing all the action over at the site Doug found, I
couldn't resist entering an entry somewhat inspired by this site, but
not competing because it gets located underwater, where many things
are simplified. I first thought of such arrangements when I was
contemplating living on a houseboat, but it scales up well. I'll not
have the energy to pursue it myself, but just get totally irritated
when people try to bolt standard windmills to the seabed. A mooring
is far cheaper, and lets the turbine follow a reversing flow, surface
for service, or dive to avoid shipping.

Kite-based collectors in flowing water:
http://challenge.ecomagination.com/ct/ct_a_view_idea.bix?c=12EB3117-
EA0C-41EB-B657-5A60BD78BD2A&idea_id={04348485-3BBD-4315-94AD-
F7DC0B898A24}

Best,
Bob Stuart
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2217 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/26/2010
Subject: KITE
"In 2009, Rogers was honored with EnergyBiz magazine's CEO of the
Year EnergyBiz KITE Award (Knowledge, Innovation, Technology,
Excellence). "



Perhaps the acronym is more on target than some know.
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2218 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/26/2010
Subject: Model?
Clip from the past:

"Several attempts had been made on the part of the aircraft man-
ufacturers to get together, but patent litigation, personal jealousies,
and a lack of an appreciation of the true value of co-operation had
made the welding process a slow one.

Finally, however, in February, 1917, during the Aeroplane Show
in New York City, Harry Bowers Mingle, the president of the
Standard Aircraft Corporation, sent out letters inviting the various
aeroplane companies to send representatives to form a committee
to discuss the situation. His invitations were accepted. The com-
mittee met and the Aircraft Manufacturers' Association was formed
on February 13, 1917. Most of the important aircraft manufac-
turers joined. "

AWEIA Airborne Wind Energy Association international

KiteLab Group KG
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2219 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/26/2010
Subject: Re: Breaking Gravity-Waves in the Surface Boundary Layer
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2220 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/26/2010
Subject: Re: AWE Peace Only ...say your stand here.

Open folder in this groups Links section may receive your links on topic:

http://tinyurl.com/WarKiting

Preamble re: Basant Day :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0mjufSMjrk

 

 

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2221 From: Doug Date: 9/27/2010
Subject: Re: Model?
I think this constant comparison of the present AWE space to aviation 100 years ago may be somewhat misplaced and a waste of energy.

Back then they all were basically imitating the structure of a bird, and all were pursuing versions of that same basic design, that was proven useful and proven to work. Additionally, there was a strong national defense component.

In this case there is no such basic design that all are pursuing together, there is nothing yet proven useful, and there are a multiplicity of mutually-exclusive basic approaches to the problem(s), from low altitude to high, helium vs. exclusively aerodynamic lift, rotating vs figure-8 etc, etc, etc.

To suggest that this effort would benefit from forced sharing of pooled IP is, I think, absurd, and you might note is constantly promoted by those who have not bothered to secure any IP or don't have any to secure in the first place - the handwavers and handwringers. They just know something is happening and they know they won't be the ones to make it work.
If someone walked right up to these people and showed them something that DID work, they'd be in denial anyway if it didn't resemble the recreational kites they were used to flying, so why even say to cooperate with the IP anyway? silly silly silly.

Yesterday I spent 12 hours at over 100 degrees in the sun putting up a Grid-Tie SuperTwin(TM)running through a WIndyBOY inverter, at our USWINDLABS test facility in Boron, CA, near Death Valley.

This machine will probably make more energy than all the AWE in histopry combined the first day the wind blows. And people keep using the term "industry" - an industry with no sales? No customers? No Manufacturers? No product? No output? Yet that is the blog-o-spere world we live in today - reality has lost its place - it's all fantasy all the time.

Today I get to drive all day to get up to Stanford for the big talker convention. This stuff drives me nuts as I COULD be getting something done... - but ya know, how could I miss such a "important" event!

Doug Selsam
http://www.selsam.com

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2222 From: Pierre Benhaiem Date: 9/27/2010
Subject: Last votes
Thank for your votes and for last votes until 30 september. Kite with human piloting carrying a wind turbine - GE Challenge ... More technical details on [PDF] September 2010 Airborne Wind Energy Conversion System (AWECS ... 
 
PierreB
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2223 From: dave santos Date: 9/27/2010
Subject: Re: Model?
The early aviation patent pool sponsored by the US gov ended a lot IP uncertainty & helped make everybody's complex systems finally "defensible" (to extend the VC "defensible IP" concept). These pools are to speed things along faster than the patents can be proved over time by courts & markets. They lump together good & bad IP to clear the patent thicket. Its a shame Google doesn't create a pool, they have the moolah. Rogallo should be honored for how he released his patents to encourage developers.
 
USWindLabs, for example, might find it attractive to join a well capitalized patent-pool to secure the certainty of a profit v. fighting patent battles with pirates, getting beat by free ideas, or seeing the patents expire before they ever take hold in the mass-market. Anyone wanting to use a USWindLabs patented idea without paying royalties demanded would be freed to found a biz without constraint, instead of avoiding the idea. In the absence of an IP pool buy-out, anyone who thinks they have "secured IP" in AWE by spending on patents may find they wasted the money.
 
A new twist is coolIP on the honor-system. PR-sensitive AWE companies face an interesting challenge if they try & use a coolIP idea & get slammed in public as cheap thieves. Such a test is likely as we have done a pretty good job of blocking potentially killer patents with mass coolIP disclosure.
 
Regarding whether a single superturbine will in one day exceed all the power ever made by kites should account hauling ships around. The kite wins, even though comparing tower-based HAWT output with experimental AWE is as misleading as comparing a old weight-lifter to a baby. The SuperTurbine needs to beat the big stock HAWTs instead of infant upperwind tech.
 



Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2224 From: dave santos Date: 9/27/2010
Subject: Enhanced Membrane Wing-Mill
Attachments :
    The attached JPG shows two recent KiteLab membrane wing-mills with pennant-like tails that enhance oscillation stability & widen the "tuning" range. One clearly sees how the flag-oscillation effect has been applied. Note the central band of tape to carry the oscillation wave smoothly downwind.
     
    No one has ever seen a flag fail to flap in a breeze, have they? The older wing-mills had the defect of glitching occasionally, sticking on a tack or "running rough", when tension or windspeed was suboptimal. The new design eliminates these problems.
     
    The new wingmills are a bit heavier, but pulse just as strongly, & remain arguably the highest weight-to-power of any AWE harvester element, with vast scaling potential. These who are unfamiliar with these devices can review extensive postings early on this forum.
     
    KiteLab proposes kitefarms as dense arrays of these devices, leaning slightly into the wind for self-lift, in pilot-lifted latticework.
     
    coolIP

      @@attachment@@
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2225 From: dave santos Date: 9/27/2010
    Subject: VariDelta- Variable Drag Delta-Kite
    Attachments :
    Perhaps the best way to vary drag in an AWECS is a separate a pilot-lift kite with a vari-drogue hung below. Nevertheless, an integrated approach has advantages, just as a conventional aircraft has built-in flaps to add drag for landing (or high lift w/ high drag).
     
    The attached KiteLab JPG shows a proper built-in flap configuration on a conventional delta kite. Note that the flap is just aft of the bridle-point axis, providing a balanced drag input, with the kites natural stability features still active. The flap has a slit for the delta's ventral dart, which also acts as an "apex-hole" stabilzer.
     
    By running two lines to the kite from a common pulley the control input is made with little force while the drag force varies greatly. The next step is for this cycle to be passively actuated thru a power-lever work-cell for a self-piloted AWECS.
     
    coolIP

      @@attachment@@
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2226 From: Joe Faust Date: 9/28/2010
    Subject: Re: CMNA Power: The "Texas School" of AWE


    CMNA


    Timeline note:  
    " CMNA Power was formed as a Texas LLC in January 2008,
    but development of its wind energy technology began in July 2007 "
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2227 From: Doug Date: 9/28/2010
    Subject: Re: Model?
    OK Dave why don't you start by putting all your IP in a pool and we will see what's there to add to, once we see how well your machine is running over time.
    Wait no I've got it: pool the ideas that work with the ones that don't work at all and come up with a machine that one person designed that all can take credit for! From each according to his ability and to each according to his need! Where have I heard that before?
    I'm late to see Ira Ehrenpreis speak (again)...
    Nice motel though


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2228 From: dave santos Date: 9/28/2010
    Subject: Re: Model?
    Doug,
     
    OK, so you will never cash-out or license to any AWE patent pool & think the early aviation pool was a historic mistake.
     
    Kitelab Illwaco's voluntary sharing is hardly the mandatory California-style communism you are accustomed to, so please don't gripe. At least the effects of climate change here are more tolerable. Its sad to see LA once again broke its heat record yesterday. The upside is the slap at simplistic denialism.
     
    Regarding freely given IP, Rogallo, & whoever invented the wheel, neatly escaped your fate of constant railing against uncomprehending experts. We can agree that Popular Science is not where the experts are, since they clearly liked the SuperTurbine.
     
    Remember, you are always welcome to visit KiteLab to inspect & fly prototypes. Bring your mysterious talked-about devices that tap Upper Wind, to compare with. Let us never confuse AWE foundational inquiry with the hawking of tower-based backyard HAWTs.
     
    You may prefer the AWE Consortium Industry Model & after-all voted for them with your cash. This free forum, on the other hand, finds nice work-arounds to paying royalties to privileged but poorly-deserving (Californians) who can afford global mine-field patents,
     
    daveS
     
     
     



    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2229 From: Secretariat, Airborne Wind Energy Industr Date: 9/28/2010
    Subject: ECOMAGINATION CHALLENGE - An AWEIA Entry
    Airborne Wind Energy Industry Industry Association (AWEIA) has now
    made on behalf of the entire Airborne Wind Energy Industry an entry in
    the GE Ecomagination challenge. The entry made by John Oyebanji AWEIA
    President protem is tittled Airborne Wind Energy (AWE) / UpperWind
    Power
    Thanks for your vote in our mutual interests.
    Best of lifts.
    JohnO
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2230 From: Secretariat, Airborne Wind Energy Industr Date: 9/28/2010
    Subject: ECOMAGINATION CHALLENGE - An AWEIA Entry
    Airborne Wind Energy Industry Industry Association (AWEIA) has now
    made on behalf of the entire Airborne Wind Energy Industry an entry in
    the GE Ecomagination challenge. The entry made by John Oyebanji AWEIA
    President protem is tittled Airborne Wind Energy (AWE) / UpperWind
    Power
    Thanks for your vote in our mutual interests.
    Best of lifts.
    JohnO
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2231 From: Bob Stuart Date: 9/28/2010
    Subject: ECOMAGINATION CHALLENGE - An AWEIA Entry
    Hi  Folks,

    Yahoo has a bug this morning, so I'm posting this for John.  The URL for his proposal is
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 2232 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 9/28/2010
    Subject: Re: ECOMAGINATION CHALLENGE - An AWEIA Entry

    I voted

    PierreB