Messages in AirborneWindEnergy group.                          AWES 17394 to 17443 Page 242 of 440.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17394 From: Rod Read Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: Daisy Launch, Reliability and power improvements

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17395 From: dave santos Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: Dropline PTO Networks (Dropstitch and Thru-Cord models)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17396 From: dougselsam Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: Dropline PTO Networks (Dropstitch and Thru-Cord models)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17397 From: dougselsam Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17398 From: stephane Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Aerosail at Monaco, l'aventure du voilier des airs continue sous un

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17399 From: dave santos Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: Dropline PTO Networks (Dropstitch and Thru-Cord models)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17400 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17401 From: dave santos Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17402 From: dougselsam Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17403 From: dave santos Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17404 From: dougselsam Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: Dropline PTO Networks (Dropstitch and Thru-Cord models)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17405 From: dougselsam Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17406 From: dave santos Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: Dropline PTO Networks (Dropstitch and Thru-Cord models)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17407 From: dave santos Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17408 From: dave santos Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: KiteSat2 Progress

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17409 From: dougselsam Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17410 From: dougselsam Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: Dropline PTO Networks (Dropstitch and Thru-Cord models)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17411 From: dave santos Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17412 From: dave santos Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: Dropline PTO Networks (Dropstitch and Thru-Cord models)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17413 From: Rod Read Date: 4/7/2015
Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17414 From: Rod Read Date: 4/7/2015
Subject: DS vs DS

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17415 From: Rod Read Date: 4/7/2015
Subject: rings won't tangle

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17416 From: dougselsam Date: 4/7/2015
Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17417 From: dougselsam Date: 4/7/2015
Subject: Re: Dropline PTO Networks (Dropstitch and Thru-Cord models)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17418 From: dougselsam Date: 4/7/2015
Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17419 From: dougselsam Date: 4/7/2015
Subject: Re: DS vs DS (dynamic soraing)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17420 From: Rod Read Date: 4/7/2015
Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17421 From: Rod Read Date: 4/7/2015
Subject: Re: Dropline PTO Networks (Dropstitch and Thru-Cord models)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17422 From: Rod Read Date: 4/7/2015
Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17423 From: Rod Read Date: 4/7/2015
Subject: single material inflated design optimisation

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17424 From: Rod Read Date: 4/7/2015
Subject: tripple net control

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17425 From: snapscan_snapscan Date: 4/7/2015
Subject: Re: Daisy Launch, Reliability and power improvements

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17426 From: dougselsam Date: 4/7/2015
Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17427 From: Rod Read Date: 4/7/2015
Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17428 From: Rod Read Date: 4/7/2015
Subject: Kite festival attendance?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17429 From: Rod Read Date: 4/7/2015
Subject: control of groups of kites on a mesh... 2 methods

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17430 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 4/8/2015
Subject: Re: Daisy Launch, Reliability and power improvements

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17431 From: Rod Read Date: 4/8/2015
Subject: Re: Daisy Launch, Reliability and power improvements

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17432 From: Rod Read Date: 4/8/2015
Subject: Fickle wind

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17433 From: Rod Read Date: 4/8/2015
Subject: Re: Fickle wind

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17434 From: dave santos Date: 4/8/2015
Subject: Proper Usage of "Wind Tower" in AWE?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17435 From: Rod Read Date: 4/8/2015
Subject: Re: Fickle wind

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17436 From: dougselsam Date: 4/8/2015
Subject: Re: Proper Usage of "Wind Tower" in AWE?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17437 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 4/8/2015
Subject: "Wind Towers"

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17438 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 4/8/2015
Subject: Re: "Wind Towers"

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17439 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 4/8/2015
Subject: Kite-farm Launch, Land, Resource-Extender, Land-area-saver

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17440 From: Christian Harrell Date: 4/8/2015
Subject: Re: Popularization of SeaGlider ?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17441 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 4/8/2015
Subject: Re: Popularization of SeaGlider ?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17442 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 4/8/2015
Subject: Energy team flies kites to teach local students

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17443 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 4/8/2015
Subject: Re: Daisy Launch, Reliability and power improvements




Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17394 From: Rod Read Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: Daisy Launch, Reliability and power improvements
If you're really keen to see how Daisy performed today there will be 3 more videos ....
Really keen...
http://youtu.be/1NhIlVh-7Cc
http://youtu.be/JGKaT5ophEU
and
http://youtu.be/A3U_Cvs3eD0

The main issue I had today was ladder hockling. This is caused by the lift to torque ratio being too small... e.g. When the lifter goes down but the Daisy catches a gust and / or I had set the gearing ratio and regeneration level too high.

This could be addressed several ways... the simplest would seem to be a software solution... Automatically adjusting the regeneration level to match wheel speed would save a whole load of problems...
At zero regen setting in the generator... the ladder will be unlikely to hockle.

Luckily I didn't have to adjust for any wind changes... (there isn't much wind behind trees)
Today I mounted the bike frame on a spike I rammed into the ground at an angle.

Lifter stability. I don't want the tips of my spinner bashing the ground because some lift kite has a huffy fit with the wind while it is concerned with how it distributes it's weight as it ages..
I discovered that you can dramatically steer the PL SSSL by having light steering lines to the second rib B bridles.
(certainly dramatic when the 8 &10 yr olds were in control)
I'm going to start using set distance steering limits from the sides.

For the wee while it was windy today ... looked promising.
I generated about a 1/4 cup of tea.

Rod Read

Windswept and Interesting Limited
15a Aiginis
Isle of Lewis
UK
HS2 0PB

07899057227
01851 870878


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17395 From: dave santos Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: Dropline PTO Networks (Dropstitch and Thru-Cord models)
Correction: AWEfest really was attempted last year, but does it count yet, because it was so small and pathetic, based on a trickle-charge to battery, and the talent was a few random hackers and their posse, in garage-band mode? Then the wind season in TX ended, and kPower management pulled the plug. This was not Wubbo's vision is for a global smash event, but what a noble attempt.

Who cares that Doug only got upset? Its not like he is supportive, only pissy; and winners don't don't give up hope like he does on AWEfest. The key fact is here we are again at the Texas AWE Encampment, and Spring has just begun, so we have a new window to try to gain viral traction, on ever sounder preparation.

Doug, please start a new topic if you cannot add to the subject line topic, but just want to complain.



On Monday, April 6, 2015 7:31 AM, "dougselsam@gmail.com [AirborneWindEnergy]" <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com  
DaveS said: "The truth is all engineering fields require professional terms. (uHHH, ROGER THAT - "PROFESSIONAL") So when Dave Lang invented "flygen" to classify a Peter Lynn AWES in a 2004 Drachen Journal, only Doug is bothered." *** Yes these terms bother me, in the following sense:  My opinion is these terms are stunted and restrictive, NOT PROFESSIONAL AT ALL, BUT AMATEURISH, reflecting stunted and restricted thinking.  They are also childish in the sense of being only too obvious from a dets=achedm beginner viewpoint, a first stab at POSSIBLY describing technologies that are not mastered at all, and perhaps not even envisioned yet.  They remind me of that famous question "have you stopped beating your wife yet?"  "Groundgen or flygen?"  Er, uhh, well...  How about this one: "How did YOUR AWE system use a kite to create music for the concert that was announced, then never even attempted?"  "Professional terms" - that's funny!


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17396 From: dougselsam Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: Dropline PTO Networks (Dropstitch and Thru-Cord models)
Hey DaveS
More power to whatever you want to do.
The only reason I've flagged your lack-of-a-promised-concert is it illustrates the emptiness of most of what you post here, which would be acceptable, except you hold some peoples' feet to the fire yourself, and not others, while endlessly posturing as an "expert", if not THE "expert" in a supposed art which is so undeveloped as to have zero actual practitioners, let alone "experts".

You seem to think you can endlessly posture and often outright lie, and nobody will notice, let alone hold YOUR feet to the fire.  And your endless shell-game of excuses and redefining is weak and transparent.  It's as though you think you are in a shooting gallery where you can shoot down everyone else, even to the point of absolute delusion, making nonstop self-congratulatory statements, and nobody can shoot back.  I think it's important for people to stand up to that level of consistent nonsense once in a while.

I could really care that the concert you announced never happened.  To me, as I've said before, it was all easily identifiable as more DaveS empty blather, and I never expected for a microsecond that your statements held any veracity whatsoever, since I know what it takes to make wind energy and how fickle the wind is that you'd be hard-pressed to schedule any event around wind on a given day, just as a start, and having played in rock bands for most of my life, how involved planning a concert is.  Let alone the simple fact that no airborne wind energy system, sufficient to power a concert, has been demonstrated, and if it has, you have probably alienated whomever has that system anyway.

Suffice it to say there was never any expectation of that 2-years-ago concert taking place, by me at least, so don't worry, you didn't let me down.

You are right about one thing, I need to get off my ass and start making things happen once again, and maybe someday if there IS a different concert that really IS planned for and really DOES take place and really IS powered by AWE, I may be able to help power it.  I am here to help get AWE going.

yer buddy,
Doug
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17397 From: dougselsam Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong
"Giant kites are a key of AWE success." Yes, just as airborne railroads suspended by balloons will "obviously" be the key to air travel....  :)
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17398 From: stephane Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Aerosail at Monaco, l'aventure du voilier des airs continue sous un
Bonjour à tous,

Je tiens à remercier très chaleureusement Monseigneur Albert de Monaco, le Gouvernement Princier de Monaco, les Affaires Maritimes et Aviation Civile Monégasque et Française, la Police Maritime de Monaco, le Service de Presse de Monaco, La Préfecture Maritime de Toulon, Héli Air Monaco, Monte-carlo Festival,  tous mes partenaires et l’équipe pour l’accueil réservé au projet Aerosail .

Voici quelques photos et Médias en cours sur le  vol d ‘essai de l'Aerosail du 28 mars 2015.


Je tiens à remercier les Medias qui se sont déplacés  malgré une actualité dramatique dans notre région, et ceux qui ce sont excusés de n’avoir pas pu venir assister au vol.


Je vous donne rendez vous en septembre / octobre 2015 pour la poursuite des essais que j espère sur plusieurs semaines  et la traversée Monaco-Corse.


Nous recherchons activement des mécènes et partenaires financiers pour cette dernière ligne droite : www.rousson.org 


Reportages Tv : 



à suivre : 3 reportages de Discovery Channel, de  Eden production ( Olivier Gouix ) et Willy Moncoiffé


Presse Ecrite : Avec la présence de l ‘Agence France Presse, Monaco Matin, Nice Matin, Getty Image





AFP : Top Shot of the day in the world by Valery hache













Mais aussi de nombreux article en presse papier : Aujourd’hui en France, Mon quotidien, 20 minutes, Direct matin, Metronews, et tout ceux que j’oublie ! 



Bonne journée à vous tous,

Stephane



Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17399 From: dave santos Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: Dropline PTO Networks (Dropstitch and Thru-Cord models)
Doug,

BTW, Drop-line PTO networks need not incorporate reels, as you mistakenly presumed. As has been covered on the Forum, short-pumping is KiteLab's solution, and we have never developed reeling AWES, letting our EU friends set the baseline performance using it. You must not read very well.

Regarding your quite overblown compliant about AWEfest delays, I cannot feel my feet in any fire you were able to light, since I am better able to judge the real progress; I feel just that you should respect the subject line on the Forum to post your complaints. Clearly you don't feel any need to share useful info about droplines, nor care to apologize for your own far graver shortcomings. I am sorry for the delay, but AWEfest really will work out fine no matter what you think, and hopefully you can do something in AWE that works out too,

daveS



On Monday, April 6, 2015 1:49 PM, "dougselsam@gmail.com [AirborneWindEnergy]" <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com  
Hey DaveS
More power to whatever you want to do.
The only reason I've flagged your lack-of-a-promised-concert is it illustrates the emptiness of most of what you post here, which would be acceptable, except you hold some peoples' feet to the fire yourself, and not others, while endlessly posturing as an "expert", if not THE "expert" in a supposed art which is so undeveloped as to have zero actual practitioners, let alone "experts".

You seem to think you can endlessly posture and often outright lie, and nobody will notice, let alone hold YOUR feet to the fire.  And your endless shell-game of excuses and redefining is weak and transparent.  It's as though you think you are in a shooting gallery where you can shoot down everyone else, even to the point of absolute delusion, making nonstop self-congratulatory statements, and nobody can shoot back.  I think it's important for people to stand up to that level of consistent nonsense once in a while.

I could really care that the concert you announced never happened.  To me, as I've said before, it was all easily identifiable as more DaveS empty blather, and I never expected for a microsecond that your statements held any veracity whatsoever, since I know what it takes to make wind energy and how fickle the wind is that you'd be hard-pressed to schedule any event around wind on a given day, just as a start, and having played in rock bands for most of my life, how involved planning a concert is.  Let alone the simple fact that no airborne wind energy system, sufficient to power a concert, has been demonstrated, and if it has, you have probably alienated whomever has that system anyway.

Suffice it to say there was never any expectation of that 2-years-ago concert taking place, by me at least, so don't worry, you didn't let me down.

You are right about one thing, I need to get off my ass and start making things happen once again, and maybe someday if there IS a different concert that really IS planned for and really DOES take place and really IS powered by AWE, I may be able to help power it.  I am here to help get AWE going.

yer buddy,
Doug


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17400 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong

Doug,

 

The great difference between AWE and air travel is the tether. And the tether takes much space, so a great kite is needed to pay off. But maybe you favor an un-tethered system.

 

PierreB

 

 

 

 

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17401 From: dave santos Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong
Doug always fails to present a technically reasoned rebuttal of kites, His neither bases his opinions on kite expertise, nor is ever able to say what technology might beat kites (like Gabor's IFO?). He seems sketchy about every specific, like whether he regards Makani, a vague preference of his, as a kite or a competitor.

Pierre is right, given the evidence available to us. Giant kites really are a revolutionary energy technology, just barely beginning to attract serious engineering development. A power kite the size of Guangdong's latest world record would unit-rate at about 10-15MW, beyond any current limits of wind towers, and North Sails of NZ is developing such a wing (via SkySails).



On Monday, April 6, 2015 1:53 PM, "dougselsam@gmail.com [AirborneWindEnergy]" <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com  
"Giant kites are a key of AWE success." Yes, just as airborne railroads suspended by balloons will "obviously" be the key to air travel....  :)


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17402 From: dougselsam Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong

"Doug, The great difference between AWE and air travel is the tether. And the tether takes much space, so a great kite is needed to pay off....PierreB" *** Thanks Pierre, but, with no economically-workable AWE schemes in sight at this time, we can only hypothesize as to what "is needed".  Better to say "what MAY BE needed..."


The reason I said "air transportation "obviously" requires airborne railroads suspended by balloons" is that this might have sounded logical to someone in the 1800's, knowing the only workable flying machines of the day were balloons etc., and the only reliable mechanical transportation system was railroads, any reputable "Professor Crackpot" of the day might of course seek to combine these two known methods into a single system, which might be lightweight railroads in the sky suspended from balloons.  Any DaveS of the day could then embellish this fantastical future-of-the-past with his spotted mushrooms and engineers that drive the trains "for the honor"...  How could anyone (at that time) question that logic? 


Similarly, today we are familiar with kites as "the" go-to method for elevating something in a windy environment, so, of course, any kite person contemplating AWE thinks it "must" involve "a bigger kite" (What else?).  There is a saying, if your tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.  Similarly, if you are a kite-flyer, any airborne challenge "obviously" requires nothing more than "a bigger kite", however, I'd like to remind everyone that there may be other answers that we are just not thinking of right now.  If this is all so simple and straightforward, why is there so little progress?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17403 From: dave santos Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong
Doug,

Can't you contribute on-subject presented or start your own topics? The obvious progress here is ongoing scaling-up of kite-tech by our Guandong friends*; and the only one unhappy about it, or here mentioning (or ever using silly) balloons is you, not anyone else.

daveS

* This latest kite owes partly to Peter Lynn's multi-cultural influence as a soft-kite master working in China, but also signals the return of China as a kite tech leader, just as in ancient times.
 



On Monday, April 6, 2015 6:22 PM, "dougselsam@gmail.com [AirborneWindEnergy]" <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com  
"Doug, The great difference between AWE and air travel is the tether. And the tether takes much space, so a great kite is needed to pay off....PierreB" *** Thanks Pierre, but, with no economically-workable AWE schemes in sight at this time, we can only hypothesize as to what "is needed".  Better to say "what MAY BE needed..."

The reason I said "air transportation "obviously" requires airborne railroads suspended by balloons" is that this might have sounded logical to someone in the 1800's, knowing the only workable flying machines of the day were balloons etc., and the only reliable mechanical transportation system was railroads, any reputable "Professor Crackpot" of the day might of course seek to combine these two known methods into a single system, which might be lightweight railroads in the sky suspended from balloons.  Any DaveS of the day could then embellish this fantastical future-of-the-past with his spotted mushrooms and engineers that drive the trains "for the honor"...  How could anyone (at that time) question that logic? 

Similarly, today we are familiar with kites as "the" go-to method for elevating something in a windy environment, so, of course, any kite person contemplating AWE thinks it "must" involve "a bigger kite" (What else?).  There is a saying, if your tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.  Similarly, if you are a kite-flyer, any airborne challenge "obviously" requires nothing more than "a bigger kite", however, I'd like to remind everyone that there may be other answers that we are just not thinking of right now.  If this is all so simple and straightforward, why is there so little progress?


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17404 From: dougselsam Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: Dropline PTO Networks (Dropstitch and Thru-Cord models)
DaveS erroneously said "Doug, BTW, Drop-line PTO networks need not incorporate reels, as you mistakenly presumed." ***No it is YOU who are mistaken.  I'm talking about NOT using reels, but the other mechanisms that have been discussed on here. Short stroke or long-stroke, kite-reeling is still in the general category of "kite-reeling", whether or not an actual reel is required.  Obviously, for s short enough stroke, no reel is required.  We've discussed many methods, not using reels.

"As has been covered on the Forum, short-pumping is KiteLab's solution, and we have never developed reeling AWES, letting our EU friends set the baseline performance using it. You must not read very well."
*** Sure Dave, whatever you say...

Regarding your quite overblown compliant about AWEfest delays,
***You just go on and on trying to rationalize the fact that you never had the promised concert of 2 years ago by using the word "delay".  The concert you announced NEVER HAPPENED.  It was years ago.  It's over.  Now you are talking about the possibility of a different concert.  Whoopee-doo.  Sure, lets have a concert.  Plenty of room at my house - we have a 5000 sq foot indoor venue, plenty of room outdoors, guitars, amps, drumsets, a P.A. system, parking, security, all powered by real wind turbines, but you will have to arrange for the porta-potties...

" I cannot feel my feet in any fire you were able to light, since I am better able to judge the real progress;"
*** You like to just pretend nobody can call you out and flag your lies - which is... (of course) another lie!

"I feel just that you should respect the subject line on the Forum to post your complaints."
*** One day it's typos (of which you are a leading offender), the next it is "not respecting subject lines" (which you are again a leading offender)  The common denominator is you are endlessly trying to pull out ANY excuse under the sun to be consistently wrong and consistently nonsensical, while never admitting it.

" Clearly you don't feel any need to share useful info about droplines,"
*** What else do you want me to say about "droplines"?

"nor care to apologize for your own far graver shortcomings."
*** Yes, my shortcomings - luckily I have you to list them every day, but I don't think you even know about the real ones

" I am sorry for the delay, but AWEfest really will work out fine no matter what you think,"
*** DaveS everything you say is some sort of untruth, and i have pointed out that your promised "concert" of a couple years ago never came close to materializing as an example of your lies.  You can just stop trying to "redefine" your way back to truthfulness and credibility.  You're misquoting me and still trying to squirm your way out of the fact that I flagged just one of a thousand lies.  Give it up - you lost.

"and hopefully you can do something in AWE that works out too," -
daveS
*** Thanks, that is the only true thing you have said


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17405 From: dougselsam Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong
DaveS said "Doug always fails..." *** (So typical of DaveS - everyone "fails" but him...) 

"to present a technically reasoned rebuttal of kites", (please read my reply to Pierre - previous message)

"His neither bases his opinions on kite expertise, nor is ever able to say what technology might beat kites (like Gabor's IFO?)." *** DaveS you are misquoting me as always, are completely out-to-lunch on this topic, and I HAVE specifically explained exactly what technology besides kites might play a role in AWE, more than one, actually, and most of my AWE demos have not used kites although I DO LOVE kites and hang gliders and all things related.

" He seems sketchy about every specific," (He theemth thketcthy about any thpethific) ***because you are not paying attention "like whether he regards Makani, a vague preference of his, as a kite or a competitor."
 ***We're back to illogical choices here - (have you stopped beating your wife yet?) - "a kite or a competitor"?  What the heck does that mean?  That statement makes no sense, sorry.

"Pierre is right, given the evidence available to us."  *** You mean given your limited imagination and incomplete understanding.  Oh wait, you're "the Nostradamus of wind energy" right?  Perhaps "THE exthpert", eh? 

"Giant kites really are a revolutionary energy technology, just barely beginning to attract serious engineering development." *** I'm sure you'll keep us abreast of developments.  I take that example of your concert again:  You went into many specifics, including the site, the big stars, etc. but depending on the day, your excuses go from only having a bunch of garage bands, to your purchasing a Marshall amp, to whatever other lame goofy or unrelated stuff that comes to you whenever you are asked about it.  So now, was it "Big Stars" or "Garage bands"?  (both already have their own amps)...

You "know everything" but when it comes time to defend the fact that none of what you say comes true, you never admit you were wrong, you just go on with more and more excuses and redefining words to somehow pretend you fought your way out of one more paper-bag of logic, which you never actually have.  By the way, when I read what you write, I always add the obligatory "Professor Crackpot" lisp, for added effect.

"A power kite the size of Guangdong's latest world record would unit-rate at about 10-15MW, beyond any current limits of wind towers, and North Sails of NZ is developing such a wing (via SkySails)."
*** OK, Captain Goofball, wasn't it just this morning you were bragging about having a working vocabulary of "professional" word definitions?  Well, I hate to break it to you, but you are the only person I'm aware of that calls wind turbines "wind towers".  I don't think there is a professional or even amateur person who would guess what you were talking about.  They are called "wind turbines" and the kind you are talking about are called "utility-scale wind turbines".  A "wind tower" sounds like something used for cooling an industrial process, or maybe a tourist venue where you could go up and experience "wind".  "Wind towers..." oh yeah, you are a real "expert".  Just make sure you keep the quote marks when making that claim.
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17406 From: dave santos Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: Dropline PTO Networks (Dropstitch and Thru-Cord models)
Doug did in fact wrongly define Dropline PTO Networks as Kite Reeling, when kite-reeling is the EU continental specialty, and our AWES polymer networks don't involve reeling at all (except to compare against).

Doug wrote "what you are now calling a "dropline PTO" is just more talk of multiple kite-reel tethers"




On Monday, April 6, 2015 7:03 PM, "dougselsam@gmail.com [AirborneWindEnergy]" <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com  
DaveS erroneously said "Doug, BTW, Drop-line PTO networks need not incorporate reels, as you mistakenly presumed." ***No it is YOU who are mistaken.  I'm talking about NOT using reels, but the other mechanisms that have been discussed on here. Short stroke or long-stroke, kite-reeling is still in the general category of "kite-reeling", whether or not an actual reel is required.  Obviously, for s short enough stroke, no reel is required.  We've discussed many methods, not using reels.

"As has been covered on the Forum, short-pumping is KiteLab's solution, and we have never developed reeling AWES, letting our EU friends set the baseline performance using it. You must not read very well."
*** Sure Dave, whatever you say...

Regarding your quite overblown compliant about AWEfest delays,
***You just go on and on trying to rationalize the fact that you never had the promised concert of 2 years ago by using the word "delay".  The concert you announced NEVER HAPPENED.  It was years ago.  It's over.  Now you are talking about the possibility of a different concert.  Whoopee-doo.  Sure, lets have a concert.  Plenty of room at my house - we have a 5000 sq foot indoor venue, plenty of room outdoors, guitars, amps, drumsets, a P.A. system, parking, security, all powered by real wind turbines, but you will have to arrange for the porta-potties...

" I cannot feel my feet in any fire you were able to light, since I am better able to judge the real progress;"
*** You like to just pretend nobody can call you out and flag your lies - which is... (of course) another lie!

"I feel just that you should respect the subject line on the Forum to post your complaints."
*** One day it's typos (of which you are a leading offender), the next it is "not respecting subject lines" (which you are again a leading offender)  The common denominator is you are endlessly trying to pull out ANY excuse under the sun to be consistently wrong and consistently nonsensical, while never admitting it.

" Clearly you don't feel any need to share useful info about droplines,"
*** What else do you want me to say about "droplines"?

"nor care to apologize for your own far graver shortcomings."
*** Yes, my shortcomings - luckily I have you to list them every day, but I don't think you even know about the real ones

" I am sorry for the delay, but AWEfest really will work out fine no matter what you think,"
*** DaveS everything you say is some sort of untruth, and i have pointed out that your promised "concert" of a couple years ago never came close to materializing as an example of your lies.  You can just stop trying to "redefine" your way back to truthfulness and credibility.  You're misquoting me and still trying to squirm your way out of the fact that I flagged just one of a thousand lies.  Give it up - you lost.

"and hopefully you can do something in AWE that works out too," -
daveS
*** Thanks, that is the only true thing you have said




Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17407 From: dave santos Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong
Doug is unaware that "wind towers" is acceptable usage, especially by UK wind experts-





On Monday, April 6, 2015 7:10 PM, "dougselsam@gmail.com [AirborneWindEnergy]" <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com  
DaveS said "Doug always fails..." *** (So typical of DaveS - everyone "fails" but him...) 

"to present a technically reasoned rebuttal of kites", (please read my reply to Pierre - previous message)

"His neither bases his opinions on kite expertise, nor is ever able to say what technology might beat kites (like Gabor's IFO?)." *** DaveS you are misquoting me as always, are completely out-to-lunch on this topic, and I HAVE specifically explained exactly what technology besides kites might play a role in AWE, more than one, actually, and most of my AWE demos have not used kites although I DO LOVE kites and hang gliders and all things related.

" He seems sketchy about every specific," (He theemth thketcthy about any thpethific) ***because you are not paying attention "like whether he regards Makani, a vague preference of his, as a kite or a competitor."
 ***We're back to illogical choices here - (have you stopped beating your wife yet?) - "a kite or a competitor"?  What the heck does that mean?  That statement makes no sense, sorry.

"Pierre is right, given the evidence available to us."  *** You mean given your limited imagination and incomplete understanding.  Oh wait, you're "the Nostradamus of wind energy" right?  Perhaps "THE exthpert", eh? 

"Giant kites really are a revolutionary energy technology, just barely beginning to attract serious engineering development." *** I'm sure you'll keep us abreast of developments.  I take that example of your concert again:  You went into many specifics, including the site, the big stars, etc. but depending on the day, your excuses go from only having a bunch of garage bands, to your purchasing a Marshall amp, to whatever other lame goofy or unrelated stuff that comes to you whenever you are asked about it.  So now, was it "Big Stars" or "Garage bands"?  (both already have their own amps)...

You "know everything" but when it comes time to defend the fact that none of what you say comes true, you never admit you were wrong, you just go on with more and more excuses and redefining words to somehow pretend you fought your way out of one more paper-bag of logic, which you never actually have.  By the way, when I read what you write, I always add the obligatory "Professor Crackpot" lisp, for added effect.

"A power kite the size of Guangdong's latest world record would unit-rate at about 10-15MW, beyond any current limits of wind towers, and North Sails of NZ is developing such a wing (via SkySails)."
*** OK, Captain Goofball, wasn't it just this morning you were bragging about having a working vocabulary of "professional" word definitions?  Well, I hate to break it to you, but you are the only person I'm aware of that calls wind turbines "wind towers".  I don't think there is a professional or even amateur person who would guess what you were talking about.  They are called "wind turbines" and the kind you are talking about are called "utility-scale wind turbines".  A "wind tower" sounds like something used for cooling an industrial process, or maybe a tourist venue where you could go up and experience "wind".  "Wind towers..." oh yeah, you are a real "expert".  Just make sure you keep the quote marks when making that claim.


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17408 From: dave santos Date: 4/6/2015
Subject: KiteSat2 Progress
Attachments :
    KiteSat1 was the trusty prototype wifi hotspot AWES that toured EU (AWEC2013 and Italy), then was sent to China by New Tech Kites, for manufacturing review and feedback, then retired back to Austin. KiteSat2 is the nearly complete design makeover by COTS kite parts, as the transition to production progresses. Part count and mass has been cut in half; but with a stronger design and better functions. The latest preproduction prototype here in Austin is looking sweeeet and headed back to the overseas supply-chain, as another turn of the engineering iterative-spiral* (Ed to post KiteSat2 detail photos and test video soon).

    KAP, trickle-charging, wifi, and AWES signal lights will all be supported by add-on packages. A showcase KiteSat2 app will be wide-area micro-FM from altitude, for humanitarian and emergency response. Initial unit wholesale cost looking to be around fifty-dollars, including pilot kite and all incidentals, for a suggested retail under one-hundred.

    -----------------------
    * standard engineering process model-
    Inline image


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17409 From: dougselsam Date: 4/6/2015
    Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong
    daveS erroneously argues: "Doug is unaware that "wind towers" is acceptable usage, especially by UK wind experts-"  ***Doug replies: Stop going on like an idiot.  Your link describes TOWERS for mounting wind turbines, not turbines themselves.  Yes, the towers are actually called towers.  The turbines are not.  Can you say "DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH"?


    ---In AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com, <santos137@...  
    DaveS said "Doug always fails..." *** (So typical of DaveS - everyone "fails" but him...) 

    "to present a technically reasoned rebuttal of kites", (please read my reply to Pierre - previous message)

    "His neither bases his opinions on kite expertise, nor is ever able to say what technology might beat kites (like Gabor's IFO?)." *** DaveS you are misquoting me as always, are completely out-to-lunch on this topic, and I HAVE specifically explained exactly what technology besides kites might play a role in AWE, more than one, actually, and most of my AWE demos have not used kites although I DO LOVE kites and hang gliders and all things related.

    " He seems sketchy about every specific," (He theemth thketcthy about any thpethific) ***because you are not paying attention "like whether he regards Makani, a vague preference of his, as a kite or a competitor."
     ***We're back to illogical choices here - (have you stopped beating your wife yet?) - "a kite or a competitor"?  What the heck does that mean?  That statement makes no sense, sorry.

    "Pierre is right, given the evidence available to us."  *** You mean given your limited imagination and incomplete understanding.  Oh wait, you're "the Nostradamus of wind energy" right?  Perhaps "THE exthpert", eh? 

    "Giant kites really are a revolutionary energy technology, just barely beginning to attract serious engineering development." *** I'm sure you'll keep us abreast of developments.  I take that example of your concert again:  You went into many specifics, including the site, the big stars, etc. but depending on the day, your excuses go from only having a bunch of garage bands, to your purchasing a Marshall amp, to whatever other lame goofy or unrelated stuff that comes to you whenever you are asked about it.  So now, was it "Big Stars" or "Garage bands"?  (both already have their own amps)...

    You "know everything" but when it comes time to defend the fact that none of what you say comes true, you never admit you were wrong, you just go on with more and more excuses and redefining words to somehow pretend you fought your way out of one more paper-bag of logic, which you never actually have.  By the way, when I read what you write, I always add the obligatory "Professor Crackpot" lisp, for added effect.

    "A power kite the size of Guangdong's latest world record would unit-rate at about 10-15MW, beyond any current limits of wind towers, and North Sails of NZ is developing such a wing (via SkySails)."
    *** OK, Captain Goofball, wasn't it just this morning you were bragging about having a working vocabulary of "professional" word definitions?  Well, I hate to break it to you, but you are the only person I'm aware of that calls wind turbines "wind towers".  I don't think there is a professional or even amateur person who would guess what you were talking about.  They are called "wind turbines" and the kind you are talking about are called "utility-scale wind turbines".  A "wind tower" sounds like something used for cooling an industrial process, or maybe a tourist venue where you could go up and experience "wind".  "Wind towers..." oh yeah, you are a real "expert".  Just make sure you keep the quote marks when making that claim.


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17410 From: dougselsam Date: 4/6/2015
    Subject: Re: Dropline PTO Networks (Dropstitch and Thru-Cord models)
    daveS displays further confusion: "Doug did in fact wrongly define Dropline PTO Networks as Kite Reeling,"
    OK fine, call it kite-pulling - whatever, same basic idea, and you know very well what I meant.

    " when kite-reeling is the EU continental specialty, and our AWES polymer networks don't involve reeling at all (except to compare against)."
    ***REeeeeaaaaaallllly, your "AWES polymer networks" huh?  More flights of fancy from daveS?  With spotted mushrooms, lots of big music stars, pilots flying them "for the honor", invoking the name Einstein at every turn... what else?  Hey Dave, I don't think you HAVE any such polymer network.  I think it is one more lie.  Man, you really ARE pathological.  I've never seen anything lie it.  You just can't stop!  Crazy!  Whacky!  I think you should hang out a sign warning people: "OUT TO LUNCH".

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17411 From: dave santos Date: 4/6/2015
    Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong
    Doug is the only party claiming that "wind towers" is an improper term, while weirdly endorsing them (in the form of "rotating towers") as an AWES basis. For the rest of us, AWE is about eliminating the "wind tower" itself (with kiteline), as has been so often publicly stated by developers, at least since Payne in the 70's.


     



    On Monday, April 6, 2015 8:18 PM, "dougselsam@gmail.com [AirborneWindEnergy]" <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com  
    daveS erroneously argues: "Doug is unaware that "wind towers" is acceptable usage, especially by UK wind experts-"  ***Doug replies: Stop going on like an idiot.  Your link describes TOWERS for mounting wind turbines, not turbines themselves.  Yes, the towers are actually called towers.  The turbines are not.  Can you say "DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH"?


    ---In AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com, <santos137@...  
    DaveS said "Doug always fails..." *** (So typical of DaveS - everyone "fails" but him...) 

    "to present a technically reasoned rebuttal of kites", (please read my reply to Pierre - previous message)

    "His neither bases his opinions on kite expertise, nor is ever able to say what technology might beat kites (like Gabor's IFO?)." *** DaveS you are misquoting me as always, are completely out-to-lunch on this topic, and I HAVE specifically explained exactly what technology besides kites might play a role in AWE, more than one, actually, and most of my AWE demos have not used kites although I DO LOVE kites and hang gliders and all things related.

    " He seems sketchy about every specific," (He theemth thketcthy about any thpethific) ***because you are not paying attention "like whether he regards Makani, a vague preference of his, as a kite or a competitor."
     ***We're back to illogical choices here - (have you stopped beating your wife yet?) - "a kite or a competitor"?  What the heck does that mean?  That statement makes no sense, sorry.

    "Pierre is right, given the evidence available to us."  *** You mean given your limited imagination and incomplete understanding.  Oh wait, you're "the Nostradamus of wind energy" right?  Perhaps "THE exthpert", eh? 

    "Giant kites really are a revolutionary energy technology, just barely beginning to attract serious engineering development." *** I'm sure you'll keep us abreast of developments.  I take that example of your concert again:  You went into many specifics, including the site, the big stars, etc. but depending on the day, your excuses go from only having a bunch of garage bands, to your purchasing a Marshall amp, to whatever other lame goofy or unrelated stuff that comes to you whenever you are asked about it.  So now, was it "Big Stars" or "Garage bands"?  (both already have their own amps)...

    You "know everything" but when it comes time to defend the fact that none of what you say comes true, you never admit you were wrong, you just go on with more and more excuses and redefining words to somehow pretend you fought your way out of one more paper-bag of logic, which you never actually have.  By the way, when I read what you write, I always add the obligatory "Professor Crackpot" lisp, for added effect.

    "A power kite the size of Guangdong's latest world record would unit-rate at about 10-15MW, beyond any current limits of wind towers, and North Sails of NZ is developing such a wing (via SkySails)."
    *** OK, Captain Goofball, wasn't it just this morning you were bragging about having a working vocabulary of "professional" word definitions?  Well, I hate to break it to you, but you are the only person I'm aware of that calls wind turbines "wind towers".  I don't think there is a professional or even amateur person who would guess what you were talking about.  They are called "wind turbines" and the kind you are talking about are called "utility-scale wind turbines".  A "wind tower" sounds like something used for cooling an industrial process, or maybe a tourist venue where you could go up and experience "wind".  "Wind towers..." oh yeah, you are a real "expert".  Just make sure you keep the quote marks when making that claim.




    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17412 From: dave santos Date: 4/6/2015
    Subject: Re: Dropline PTO Networks (Dropstitch and Thru-Cord models)
    Mothra is a good polymer network example consisting of 50 tarps on rope loadpaths. Many other modular kite systems qualify under the definition here, like the World Record Fighter Kites on One Line (all polymer) as a SpiderMill case. All these polymer systems have accepted network topologies.



    On Monday, April 6, 2015 8:25 PM, "dougselsam@gmail.com [AirborneWindEnergy]" <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com  
    daveS displays further confusion: "Doug did in fact wrongly define Dropline PTO Networks as Kite Reeling,"
    OK fine, call it kite-pulling - whatever, same basic idea, and you know very well what I meant.

    " when kite-reeling is the EU continental specialty, and our AWES polymer networks don't involve reeling at all (except to compare against)."
    ***REeeeeaaaaaallllly, your "AWES polymer networks" huh?  More flights of fancy from daveS?  With spotted mushrooms, lots of big music stars, pilots flying them "for the honor", invoking the name Einstein at every turn... what else?  Hey Dave, I don't think you HAVE any such polymer network.  I think it is one more lie.  Man, you really ARE pathological.  I've never seen anything lie it.  You just can't stop!  Crazy!  Whacky!  I think you should hang out a sign warning people: "OUT TO LUNCH".



    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17413 From: Rod Read Date: 4/7/2015
    Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong

    The topic started out as, World's biggest kite.
    We now have ongoing petty argument off topic. :(

    For disambiguation sakes.

    Tower: can be a verb or a noun.
    So applies to both kite and rigid structure turbine arguments.

    Having a lesson in language use from me should be considered a new low.

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17414 From: Rod Read Date: 4/7/2015
    Subject: DS vs DS

    In the red corner Ds
    In the blue corner dS
    Round 2. Start!
    Ds gets first hit.
    A swift hook from dS.
    ............. Forever.....

    Keep your bitter muppet thugging slanging matches in this topic to have it stay on forum please DSs

    The ref.

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17415 From: Rod Read Date: 4/7/2015
    Subject: rings won't tangle
    Stretched Torque Ring Nets key advantage over Torque Ladder arrangements is much less likelihood of snagging in the hockled state.
    The collapse of the tube is contained over the lift line in the soft material
    The ring components are unable to interact by containment within the closed tube.

    A stick length will always be able to enter the hypotenuse of its connection to another stick. Planarity of the mesh face it presents for energy transfer is inverted causing a kink / ripple in desired form.

    Untangling ladder was about an hours worth of what I did yesterday.

    A test is definitely needed.
    To start a garden hoop tunnel net size device will do ... but
    A concentric ring launch device to allow transfer length extension by sequenced release and retraction of linked rings along the lift line ... can't be that hard too make.

    Anyone up for doing that?

    Rod Read

    Windswept and Interesting Limited
    15a Aiginis
    Isle of Lewis
    UK
    HS2 0PB

    07899057227
    01851 870878

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17416 From: dougselsam Date: 4/7/2015
    Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong
    DaveS said: "Doug is the only party claiming that "wind towers" is an improper term"
    *** It is improper in the way you have been using it, which is to refer to a windfarm turbine.

    "while weirdly endorsing them (in the form of "rotating towers") as an AWES basis."
    *** No, I don't call it a "windtower".   You erroneously provided a link to a company in Europe that manufactures the rolled-steel towers that support wind turbines, thinking it was a wind turbine manufacturer, showing all once again your ignorance and willingness to argue endlessly from a baseless ignorant position.

    "For the rest of us, 
    AWE is about eliminating the "wind tower" itself (with kiteline), as has been so often publicly stated by developers, at least since Payne in the 70's."
    *** As always, slippery as a slimy eel, you seek to wriggle your way out of your previous statements by "redefining words".  You have been referring to entire wind turbine installations as "windtowers" for years, and only realized your error after being unable to find anyone else who agreed, whereupon you found yourself providing a link to a rolled-steel tower manufacturer.  Once again, you lose.  For the umpteenth time, you have proven yourself wrong, and demonstrated that you have no idea of "professional terminology", and no idea what the heck you are talking about.  Your attempted way out is to lie again.  At least you are consistent.
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17417 From: dougselsam Date: 4/7/2015
    Subject: Re: Dropline PTO Networks (Dropstitch and Thru-Cord models)
    "Mothra is a good polymer network example consisting of 50 tarps on rope loadpaths"
    *** Methinks it is more an artifact of the fact that tarps of sufficient size are not sold at mass-marketing retail outlets, so you decided to tie a few tarps together.

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17418 From: dougselsam Date: 4/7/2015
    Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong
    Roddy said: "Tower: can be a verb or a noun."
    *** So can "keister"
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17419 From: dougselsam Date: 4/7/2015
    Subject: Re: DS vs DS (dynamic soraing)
    A fair contest would be one thing, but one contestant keeps jumping in and out of the ring, grabbing chairs and swinging them around, taking a break to change costumes then sneaking back into the ring, covering himself in oil to try and make himself so slippery nobody can get a grip on him, running through the audience screaming and stepping on peoples' heads, all while never having had any actual training, so as to have any idea what he is doing.
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17420 From: Rod Read Date: 4/7/2015
    Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong
    Spam sounds like ham ... but it's sort of not.
    AWE sounds like whoosh. But I'm not hearing much of that.

    Rod Read

    Windswept and Interesting Limited
    15a Aiginis
    Isle of Lewis
    UK
    HS2 0PB

    07899057227
    01851 870878


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17421 From: Rod Read Date: 4/7/2015
    Subject: Re: Dropline PTO Networks (Dropstitch and Thru-Cord models)
    A single planar sheet cut to make a Mothra-a-like kite blade could only smoothly form a null Gaussian curvature geometry.
    There is scope there for a very planar wingform...(no camber) might be some ok shapes. Could maybe work with the right bridling.
    Can't imagine it's very efficient to cut one out of a large sheet though.


    Rod Read

    Windswept and Interesting Limited
    15a Aiginis
    Isle of Lewis
    UK
    HS2 0PB

    07899057227
    01851 870878


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17422 From: Rod Read Date: 4/7/2015
    Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong
    You spelled kitesteer wrong

    Rod Read

    Windswept and Interesting Limited
    15a Aiginis
    Isle of Lewis
    UK
    HS2 0PB

    07899057227
    01851 870878


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17423 From: Rod Read Date: 4/7/2015
    Subject: single material inflated design optimisation
    Maybe we can make a roller printer which squirts appropriate thickness's of rubberised material over a loadpath to make giant flying bunny power kites...
    Stay with me...
    https://graphics.ethz.ch/~bthomasz/PDF/Balloons.pdf
    or of course
    we could just build layer upon layer of flying...
    http://binishells.com/systems/systems3.html


    Rod Read

    Windswept and Interesting Limited
    15a Aiginis
    Isle of Lewis
    UK
    HS2 0PB

    07899057227
    01851 870878

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17424 From: Rod Read Date: 4/7/2015
    Subject: tripple net control
    given a tripple layer hexagon net...
    3D_Hexagonal_Weaving_thumb
    and 3 points of control soft kites to mount thereupon.
    How can you change the kites and net performance given relational tension differences in the layer stretching vectors?

    Rod Read

    Windswept and Interesting Limited
    15a Aiginis
    Isle of Lewis
    UK
    HS2 0PB

    07899057227
    01851 870878

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17425 From: snapscan_snapscan Date: 4/7/2015
    Subject: Re: Daisy Launch, Reliability and power improvements
    Great progress Rod!

    On the hockling issues when the lift to torque ratio is being too small:

    A hardware solution would be a clutch that is being closed by the tension in the center line (which is directly related to the lift).


    /cb
     
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17426 From: dougselsam Date: 4/7/2015
    Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong
    "You spelled kitesteer wrong" - Rod Read ***You spelled "triple" wrong - it has one "p".


    ---In AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com, <rod.read@...
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17427 From: Rod Read Date: 4/7/2015
    Subject: Re: World's biggest kite flown in Guangdong
    P proves my point...

    Having grammar lessons from me should be considered a new low for the forum.

    Tripple tea makes me need more P... So does a cold wet kite test field.


    Rod Read

    Windswept and Interesting Limited
    15a Aiginis
    Isle of Lewis
    UK
    HS2 0PB

    07899057227
    01851 870878


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17428 From: Rod Read Date: 4/7/2015
    Subject: Kite festival attendance?
    Any of the European mainland teams going to be demonstrating at..

    International Berck-sur-Mer Kite Festival
    Sat, 18 April, 00:00 – Mon, 27 April, 00:00
    5 Avenue Francis Tattegrain, 62600 Berck-sur-Mer, Nord-Pas-De-Calais, France
    29th International Berck-sur-Mer Kite Festival, 5 Avenue Francis Tattegrain, 62600 Berck-sur-Mer, Nord-Pas-De-Calais, France

    http://www.cerf-volant-berck.com/#exposants

    ?

    Anyone want to send me there?


    Rod Read

    Windswept and Interesting Limited
    15a Aiginis
    Isle of Lewis
    UK
    HS2 0PB

    07899057227
    01851 870878

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17429 From: Rod Read Date: 4/7/2015
    Subject: control of groups of kites on a mesh... 2 methods
    Attachments :
      As per discussion earlier of picture from www.co-de-it.com/wordpress/code/grasshopper-code
      3D_Hexagonal_Weaving_thumb
      you could control a mesh of 3 point spinnaker like kites with one of these meshes.

      The other method of group control I keep considering is standard kite material grouped on a spinnaker mesh form....
      As displayed in the top right most frame in this picture.
      Inline images 1


      For a video explanation of the two principles.... https://youtu.be/cTphftirdW0

      Also earlier today was a question of what forms can be made from a single sheet...
      The purple one top left frame might fly to roughly approximate the blue surface form above it.

      Rod Read

      Windswept and Interesting Limited
      15a Aiginis
      Isle of Lewis
      UK
      HS2 0PB

      07899057227
      01851 870878

      Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17430 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 4/8/2015
      Subject: Re: Daisy Launch, Reliability and power improvements

      A question to Rod, Doug, Dave(S, L, N), Christof and all,

       

      Without kite lifter, Daisy does not have lift by itself, but with a kite lifter big enough, Daisy is tilted and takes lift by itself. What is your advice about it?

      (note I test some rotative kites).

       

      PierreB

       

       

       

       

      Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17431 From: Rod Read Date: 4/8/2015
      Subject: Re: Daisy Launch, Reliability and power improvements
      Find a balance but...
      Go big on lift so as you can set the Daisy how you want it.
      Any Daisy will have to face a variety of wind alignment.
      Losing alignment along it's "ladder" is to be avoided... Go for extra lift line tension and pull down rearward from above behind the lifting bearing So as you can set the Daisy flat enough to the wind.
      There's not much lift in the daisy itself when flying... it's more draggy / still taking lift from the line it's mounted on.


      Rod Read

      Windswept and Interesting Limited
      15a Aiginis
      Isle of Lewis
      UK
      HS2 0PB

      07899057227
      01851 870878


      Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17432 From: Rod Read Date: 4/8/2015
      Subject: Fickle wind

      So close to getting that cuppa brewed for my mum.
      But the wind has died at 20 watt hours.
      I was getting 2watt hours per minute at the start of the test.
      Fingers crossed the wind comes back.
      Might have to go up a hill. Seaside weather sucks. Was 5.2m windsurfing sail size weather to start... 7m and course board now. (standard units!)
      Strong wind rules.

      Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17433 From: Rod Read Date: 4/8/2015
      Subject: Re: Fickle wind
      Damit Damit Damit Damit Damit Damit DAMIT
      The wind really really picked back UP!
      The Daisy would drive for a while until the wing tips would collapse and fold in... invariably snagging or collapsing the ring.
      The leading struts also kept popping out of the wee kite pockets.
      I noticed one of the inside ring stiffeners had snapped so I got "smart" and decided to use that thin rod material as extra stiffening in the leading edge pockets. I also sewed the wee pockets shut.
      Right time to relaunch the lifter.... It was too windy and I should have known it (3.8m windsurf sail weather)
      I was getting flung about like a rag doll trying to launch the lifter.
      When the force eventually went straight into the lift line a series of components snapped, ripped, pulled from the ground...I was lucky not to get struck by the dog tie down back end, lift height adjust anchor flying by.
      PANTS. Your Google bosses would have loved this for a broken equipment test.
      DAMIT
      It was going soooo well first thing 22.5watt hours isn't a big mug of tea.

      Rod Read

      Windswept and Interesting Limited
      15a Aiginis
      Isle of Lewis
      UK
      HS2 0PB

      07899057227
      01851 870878


      Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17434 From: dave santos Date: 4/8/2015
      Subject: Proper Usage of "Wind Tower" in AWE?
      A top claim by AWE proponents, with many minor variations*, is that "kite lines" can replace "wind towers" as the core technical means to place WECS into better wind higher up. In particular, the claim is that AWE by means of kites can reach far higher altitudes to extract better wind than any wind tower (rotating or not), at far lower capital cost.

      Here on the Forum, this use of "wind towers" has been common correct usage for years, with only Doug suddenly objecting. In particular, the following statements expresses my accustomed usage of "wind towers" in the precise context of Doug's AWES thinking-

        "USWindLab's SuperTurbine concept is not even suitable to only match the (turbine hub) height of conventional wind towers (~300ft), much less reach higher AWE target altitudes, like the FAA's provisional 2000ft ceiling, due to practical square-cube scaling limits."

      A shorter but still correct version- 

        "The SuperTurbine will not economically scale, even just to wind tower height."

      Doug is mistaken to claim such "wind tower" usage is incorrect, nor standard in AWE.


      -------------------------
      * typical public usage of "wind towers" in AWE literature -

      IEEE transactions, Stanford, 2009- "...actual wind power technology, based on wind towers, has several limitations that need to be overcome."


      Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17435 From: Rod Read Date: 4/8/2015
      Subject: Re: Fickle wind
      Attachments :

        ​I may well have exploded my kite....
        But mum gets a cuppa. Hooray!

        Rod Read

        Windswept and Interesting Limited
        15a Aiginis
        Isle of Lewis
        UK
        HS2 0PB

        07899057227
        01851 870878


        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17436 From: dougselsam Date: 4/8/2015
        Subject: Re: Proper Usage of "Wind Tower" in AWE?
        daveS said: "Here on the Forum, this use of "wind towers" has been common correct usage for years, with only Doug suddenly objecting" *** I think you are the only one using the term to describe the entire turbine/tower, and it seems derogatory in nature, like a slur.  As your examples show, it is always used in a negative context.  It seems that you want to pretend that "Wind Tower", to describe a turbine ON a tower, is standard usage, where it is not.  Typical newbie stuff, fixating on one aspect of vocabulary, denigrating what's known to work, trying to obfuscate the subject by applying inappropriate labels.
        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17437 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 4/8/2015
        Subject: "Wind Towers"

        Images by Google Search for exactly "wind tower"  HERE


        This topic thread over " wind tower "    or  " wind towers "

        has an eye for inspirations for kite-energy industry.

        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17438 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 4/8/2015
        Subject: Re: "Wind Towers"

        The mix might include " windcatchers "

        Start on that branch:   Windcatcher - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


        So, ready to fly some AWES within windcatchers or wind towers?

        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17439 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 4/8/2015
        Subject: Kite-farm Launch, Land, Resource-Extender, Land-area-saver

        Have a wide-mesh net stretched over a patch of land. Use node supports as wished. Let kite-energy systems launch from, land, rest, etc. on the patch-covering wide-mesh net.  Tethers and sails stay almost completely sky-side of the patch-covering net. Farming and other activities continue as needed on the soil side of the broad patch-covering net. Low-mass secondary uses of the broad net may be employed (say, hang clothes to dry; hang posters; hang bird nests, hang swings, hang manufactured things to dry, hand vines for growing fruits and vegetables, hang WECs from the net; hang solar-energy devices from the net, have transport vehicles hanging from the kite-field broad-raised net system, etc.).    We have already had some launch and passive self-relaunch notes share in forum by the use of perimeter high lines to drape sails ready for working in AWES.     IsoDome AWES may consider self-storage atop a farm broad-patch raised net. The systems of such raised net permit safe operation of many human living and commercial activity.   


        CC BY NC SA   kPower, Inc.    See us for easy license to use such net tech for kite-energy systems.

        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17440 From: Christian Harrell Date: 4/8/2015
        Subject: Re: Popularization of SeaGlider ?

        Joe!

        Ive been researching more about Hagedoorn Paravanes, HAPA and I was curious if you had any more information on him or the subject of Man lifting kites for transatlantic trips? Ive been trying to find Hagedoorns essay The Ultimate Sailing, in which extols what I believe to be the best form of sailing but it is no where to be found.. 

        Christian 

        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17441 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 4/8/2015
        Subject: Re: Popularization of SeaGlider ?

        Did you explore:

        Theo Schmidt, Theodor Schmidt


         and


        Glencross R. 1993. Sailing craft Hagedoorn. AYRS Projects . AYRS Publication No. 112.

        Glencross R. 1996. Kites and Hapas at Speedweek 1996. Ultimate Sailing IV. AYRS Publication No. 112.

        Hagedoorn J.G. 1971/1994. Ultimate Sailing: Introducing the Hapa/Ultimate Sailing: The Hapa Revisited. AYRS PublicationNo. 114.

        Hagedoorn J.G. 1975. Ultimate sailing. Scientific American , March (page numbers unavailable).

        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17442 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 4/8/2015
        Subject: Energy team flies kites to teach local students
        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 17443 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 4/8/2015
        Subject: Re: Daisy Launch, Reliability and power improvements

        Daisy becoming a giant AWES, is a cyclic piloting necessary and possible to obtain some lift, as a steered wing flying by loop (Makani for example)?

         

        PierreB