Messages in AirborneWindEnergy group.                                  AWES1524to1576
Page 11 of 79.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1524 From: dave santos Date: 5/14/2010
Subject: Re: Wish-Turbines

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1525 From: dave santos Date: 5/14/2010
Subject: Mishap Rates

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1526 From: dave santos Date: 5/15/2010
Subject: Ground-based AWE Automation with Human Supervision

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1528 From: dave santos Date: 5/16/2010
Subject: Re: Ground-based AWE Automation with Human Supervision

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1529 From: Uwe Fechner Date: 5/16/2010
Subject: Re: Ground-based AWE Automation with Human Supervision

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1530 From: Pierre Benhaiem Date: 5/16/2010
Subject: Re: Ground-based AWE Automation with Human Supervision

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1531 From: Doug Date: 5/16/2010
Subject: Re: Ground-based AWE Automation with Human Supervision

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1532 From: harry valentine Date: 5/16/2010
Subject: Possible Source of Funding

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1533 From: dave santos Date: 5/17/2010
Subject: AWE Automation

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1534 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/17/2010
Subject: Safety-Critical Knowledge

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1535 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/17/2010
Subject: Re: Ground-based AWE Automation with Human Supervision

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1536 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/17/2010
Subject: Re: Ground-based AWE Automation with Human Supervision

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1537 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/17/2010
Subject: AWECS Control folder opportunity

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1538 From: Doug Date: 5/17/2010
Subject: Superturbine(R) AWE in Popular Science, Popular Mechanics, Windpower

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1539 From: Doug Date: 5/18/2010
Subject: underwater hydrogen storage

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1540 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/18/2010
Subject: Re: Ground-based AWE Automation with Human Supervision

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1541 From: harry valentine Date: 5/18/2010
Subject: Re: underwater hydrogen storage

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1542 From: dave santos Date: 5/19/2010
Subject: Advanced Kite Killing

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1543 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/19/2010
Subject: Re: SWCC Applicants to be Announced; Commissioners Appointed

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1544 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/20/2010
Subject: JoeBen Bevirt

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1545 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/20/2010
Subject: Apparatus for generating power using jet stream wind power

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1546 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/20/2010
Subject: Atmospheric Resources Explorer

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1547 From: dave santos Date: 5/21/2010
Subject: Ancient Single-Line Kite as a Cybernetic Device

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1550 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/21/2010
Subject: Lamar Baker's Ezekial Saw The Wheel, 1943

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1551 From: Bob Stuart Date: 5/21/2010
Subject: Re: Lamar Baker's Ezekial Saw The Wheel, 1943

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1552 From: dave santos Date: 5/21/2010
Subject: Re: Lamar Baker's Ezekial Saw The Wheel, 1943

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1553 From: Doug Date: 5/22/2010
Subject: Anyone going to Dallas?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1554 From: dave santos Date: 5/22/2010
Subject: Lifter-Kite Overview

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1555 From: dave santos Date: 5/22/2010
Subject: Analog-to-Digital Kiting

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1556 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/23/2010
Subject: 2003 article by Wayne German

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1557 From: dave santos Date: 5/24/2010
Subject: Patents v. People

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1558 From: spacecannon@san.rr.com Date: 5/24/2010
Subject: Re: Patents v. People

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1559 From: dave santos Date: 5/24/2010
Subject: Re: Patents v. People

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1560 From: Hardensoft International Limited Date: 5/25/2010
Subject: Google.org

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1561 From: Hardensoft International Limited Date: 5/25/2010
Subject: Re: Patents v. People

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1562 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/25/2010
Subject: Soaren

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1563 From: Doug Date: 5/26/2010
Subject: Re: Patents v. People (or patents by and for people)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1564 From: dave santos Date: 5/26/2010
Subject: Re: Patents v. People (or patents by and for people)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1565 From: Hardensoft International Limited Date: 5/27/2010
Subject: Still On Google

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1566 From: harry valentine Date: 5/27/2010
Subject: Re: Still On Google

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1567 From: Doug Date: 5/27/2010
Subject: Re: Patents v. People (or patents by and for people)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1568 From: dave santos Date: 5/27/2010
Subject: Re: Still On Google

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1569 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/27/2010
Subject: Malcolm Phillips

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1570 From: dave santos Date: 5/27/2010
Subject: Origins & Dynamics of KitePlanes & Tethered Flying-Wings

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1571 From: harry valentine Date: 5/27/2010
Subject: Re: Still On Google

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1572 From: dave santos Date: 5/27/2010
Subject: Re: Still On Google

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1573 From: dimitri.cherny Date: 5/28/2010
Subject: Re: Still On Google

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1574 From: Dan Parker Date: 5/28/2010
Subject: Re: Still On Google

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1575 From: Hardensoft International Limited Date: 5/28/2010
Subject: Public versus Private Posts

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1576 From: dave santos Date: 5/28/2010
Subject: Re: Still On Google




Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1524 From: dave santos Date: 5/14/2010
Subject: Re: Wish-Turbines
Reinhart,
 
AWE ROI focus clearly beats Doug's discredited disc efficiency claim, especially as he tilts his rotors, depends on a highly stressed torsion tube, & is stuck low. These issues have been very exhaustively debated on this forum. Conventional turbines thus dominate surface wind energy, but won't scale well for airborne use due to cubic scaling mass penalty.
 
Powerful airborne wind energy is in fact well shown in ship towing, so you need not wait. The various 10kw (40kw record") class electric AWE demos should hardly be dismissed as "a couple of watts". They are scaling up even as you read this. 
 
Its futile to lament that AWE is but a "new born baby". Instead let's revel in the wonder of this brief childhood phase. What Doug seems to miss is how cool it is that current small AWE trickle chargers can self-fly hundreds of feet high in superior wind while a far more expensive tower-based system sits idled in calm surface air. This is true in many common conditions (like night-time, valleys, low-wind regions, etc.) where a calm surface inversion or turbulent layer develops under an enhanced low-level-jet (LLJ) layer. Thus, in many a race to, say, charge a battery, the cheap kite toy will score over anything stuck on the ground.
 
Lets all agree that high-power AWE should not come too fast, out of safety concerns,
 
dave
 
 
 



Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1525 From: dave santos Date: 5/14/2010
Subject: Mishap Rates
Bottom line, for an average high-end production UAV, it takes about 100,000 cumulative flight hours by a dedicated team to get to marginal reliability acceptable in remote settings. Expert remote-piloting/supervision has been generally required. Autonomy will grow but remains more mishap-prone. The thirty year trend is for overall UAV reliability to slowly improve, so that in ten years we might see meantime to marginal reliability drop to about 50,000hr.
 
This link continues to be an excellent overview of how reliability slowly emerges in a complex UAV-
 
www.barnardmicrosystems.com/L4E_reliability.htm

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1526 From: dave santos Date: 5/15/2010
Subject: Ground-based AWE Automation with Human Supervision
A prominent AWE school of thought is focused on flying-robots so wonderful they operate reliably for long periods unattended. It might be the first aviation technology to do so, but in the field of Artificial Intelligence its been clear for a decade at least that truly smart systems are far slower to emerge than was expected. Its 2010 & there is no HAL9000 or Terminator in sight. A new appreciation exists for naturally evolved intelligence.
 
Robots still have vast promise for AWE. They do work properly in fabulously expensive programs like space exploration & highly structured environments like factories. They work well under close supervision with humans to relieve tedious chores. Even the simplest autopilot is a pilot's friend, much as "lashing-the-tiller" allows a sailor relief, but no autopilot ever developed comes close to the senses, knowledge, & wisdom of an expert human pilot.
 
Thus practical AWECS presently requires human supervision. The workload on the human must be kept light, so the system should be self-flying with the human ready for tricky operations & exception-handling. All auxiliary automation is best kept on the ground where it is not mass-limited or radio-linked. Ground equipment can be serviced easier, is far cheaper, & less exposed to loss than flying equipment.
 
Basic ground-based AWE mechanical agents work far better scary flaky flying-robots. They can be redundant combinations of well proven industrial control technology too fragile or massive to fly. Some will be semi-autonomous tow/winch vehicles on tracks or following buried wires. Smart-winches will handle lines like a pro, actuating the array by merely "pulling the strings".
 
Ground-based radar is a clear winner for position tracking of aerial arrays. a single rotating "eye" can see every flying object provided with a simple cheap corner reflector in all lighting & weather conditions. System backups are cheap & easy if ground-based. Hardly any electronics need fly for AWE to work well & scale up. Even the navigation lighting function might be ground-based, with on-demand floodlights brilliantly illuminating an array's membranes & reflectors if air-traffic strays. 
 
Ground-based Automation with human supervision is the safest AWE bet Its a more insurable investment. The "kite-pilot" jobs are very cool. There will be less loss of life & the technology will be more accessible at lower cost.
 
coopIP/fairIP
 
 
 
 
 

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1528 From: dave santos Date: 5/16/2010
Subject: Re: Ground-based AWE Automation with Human Supervision
SkySails has done many things right-

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1529 From: Uwe Fechner Date: 5/16/2010
Subject: Re: Ground-based AWE Automation with Human Supervision
Hello,
I will try to develop a kite control system at TU Delft, begining the
1st of July. I might need four years, but I am optimistic, that we can
publish our results in an open source manner.
I have some safety critical knowledge in the field of the development of
realtime control systems, because I was working in the field of medical
device development for five years.

Best regards:

Uwe Fechner

dave santos schrieb:
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1530 From: Pierre Benhaiem Date: 5/16/2010
Subject: Re: Ground-based AWE Automation with Human Supervision

(I put again the precedent deleted message,with light complement)

Fine analysis.

Possible studying steering systems according to scale and use of AWECS:
-complete automation
-semi-automation
-no automation
       with
-active control:automatic control or human control (for example for cell phone charger as toy) 
-passive control (KiteLab' searches).

An example of mixt of complete and semi-automation and ground-based and flying based (pod) automation:
http://www.skysails .info/english/ products/ the-skysails- technology/ system-component s/steering- system/ .Pod advantages are allowing only one line,and also an easier steering because control lines are close to the wing.That compensates inconvenience of aloft avionics.

PierreB

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1531 From: Doug Date: 5/16/2010
Subject: Re: Ground-based AWE Automation with Human Supervision
Wind turbines started out as stable physically, able to run unattended by their mere physical configuration, and only now begin to employ architecture that would be unstable without the computer controls, though the simplest turbines are still the most reliable.

Same with aircraft - the old way said they had to fly stable if the pilot took hands off, still a good idea for most aircraft.

So I imagine airborne wind energy will start out as physically-stable platforms, then maybe morph into systems that are stable only by computer eventually as confidence is gained with any machine that proves to deliver economically-useful power in any setting.

The problem with physical stability controlled only by software is when something unexpected happens like a lightning strike or any electric spark for that matter, let alone an EMP.
:)
Doug S.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1532 From: harry valentine Date: 5/16/2010
Subject: Possible Source of Funding
Cleantech has a link to a possible source of funding for renewable energy porjects, see:
 
http://cleantech.socialgo.com/forum/topic/717
 
Harry



30 days of prizes: Hotmail makes your day easier! Enter now
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1533 From: dave santos Date: 5/17/2010
Subject: AWE Automation
Uwe,
 
You have a very fun project ahead. The basics are easy, but perfection is an intractable solution.
 
What sort of kite platform will you be working with?
 
What sort of sensor suite? 
 
What sort of control architecture?
 
Thanks for details,
 
daveS
 


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1534 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/17/2010
Subject: Safety-Critical Knowledge

Following pointed note by Dave Santos,

http://www.energykitesystems.net/SafetyCriticalKnowledge/index.html 

invites e-mail as well as anonymous online data input.

Papers are also invited for AWE Journal with the same focus.

Also, FairIP and CoopIP articles are invited on safety-critical matters for AWECS.

JoeF

 

 

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1535 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/17/2010
Subject: Re: Ground-based AWE Automation with Human Supervision

http://tinyurl.com/SkySailsSteeringLIFT

Toward PierreB   link ... in prior post.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1536 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/17/2010
Subject: Re: Ground-based AWE Automation with Human Supervision

http://tinyurl.com/ElectroMotivePulseLIFTgeneral

in support of Doug Selsam's  placing EMP on the table.

 

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1537 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/17/2010
Subject: AWECS Control folder opportunity
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1538 From: Doug Date: 5/17/2010
Subject: Superturbine(R) AWE in Popular Science, Popular Mechanics, Windpower
Howdy fellow Imagineers, just wanted to let everyone know:

Popular Science Magazine
June 2010 Page 51 (bottom 1/4 of the page)
"The Sky Serpent", 2008 Invention of the Year,
the machine we flew at Oroville
on Newsstands now...

also
Popular Mechanics Online currently features two (2) Superturbines:
1) A photo of the tower-mounted prototype originally built and tested for The California Energy Commission, showing G.E. windfarm below in background;
2) A rendering of the offshore version in AWE mode, with the driveshaft greatly extended, supported at the distal end by a blimp.
LINK:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/solar-wind/4324331

also
Windpower Engineering Magazine has now published their current print article on offshore & AWE Superturbine(R) technology on their website.
LINK:
http://www.windpowerengineering.com/policy/news/clever-ideas-float-more-than-a-turbine/
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1539 From: Doug Date: 5/18/2010
Subject: underwater hydrogen storage
I was thinking about my recent post discussing hydrogen stored underwater in bags and realized that the overall efficiency is probably not as low as I had cited since the hydrogen does not have to be highly compressed using this method, depending on depth. To Dave S.: I do agree that storage of gas underwater in bags is a clever idea. Maybe this would be a good option for natural gas storage too, especially at such point as we are harvesting methane ices from the ocean bottoms, said to contain more energy than all the oil, coal and gas in the world combined. Ironic that these ices screwed up the attempt to stifle the oil leak in the gulf. (That said, I think mother nature would clean up the spill without a problem using her bacteria that love organic matter as food.)
Still though, the general inefficiency of using hydrogen as an energy storage medium is well-known, and however clever underwater bags for gas storage may be, storing energy does not really get us to AWE per se.
Doug S.
714-992-5594
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1540 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/18/2010
Subject: Re: Ground-based AWE Automation with Human Supervision

The search meter comparison between

EMP for electromotive pulse is at  1/1000 th of that for

EMP for electromagnetic pulse:

http://tinyurl.com/ElectroMagneticPulseLIFTofEMP

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1541 From: harry valentine Date: 5/18/2010
Subject: Re: underwater hydrogen storage
The Hydrogen Association is looking at the same storage system used by the natural gas industry . . . . .  flushed salt domes . . . . there are about 500 of them in the south-central USA (around Texas). Some emptied salt domes can measure up to 1-mile in diameter by up to 6-miles in vertical height, including the dome-shape roof that has its peak some 2000-feet or more below ground surface.
 
 
Harry

 

To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
From: doug@selsam.com
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 16:58:56 +0000
Subject: [AWECS] underwater hydrogen storage

 
I was thinking about my recent post discussing hydrogen stored underwater in bags and realized that the overall efficiency is probably not as low as I had cited since the hydrogen does not have to be highly compressed using this method, depending on depth. To Dave S.: I do agree that storage of gas underwater in bags is a clever idea. Maybe this would be a good option for natural gas storage too, especially at such point as we are harvesting methane ices from the ocean bottoms, said to contain more energy than all the oil, coal and gas in the world combined. Ironic that these ices screwed up the attempt to stifle the oil leak in the gulf. (That said, I think mother nature would clean up the spill without a problem using her bacteria that love organic matter as food.)
Still though, the general inefficiency of using hydrogen as an energy storage medium is well-known, and however clever underwater bags for gas storage may be, storing energy does not really get us to AWE per se.
Doug S.
714-992-5594




MSN Dating: Find someone special. Start now. Start now!
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1542 From: dave santos Date: 5/19/2010
Subject: Advanced Kite Killing
AWE arrays must douse quickly & easily in an emergency. Prompt killing minimizes damage & risk in many failure-modes. Proposed FAA regulations require fast evasive action by a sUAS to give right-of-way to manned aircraft in shared airspace. A common kite problem is for wind to increase unexpectedly & overpower retraction force. Back-up landing methods are needed. 
 
Kite killers for single traction kites are well known, but killers for arrays (trains & arches) hardly exist. Every lifter kite in an array might have its own killer as part of a hot-swap capability. Multiple killer tag-lines can be rigged as leaders along a main kill line whereby ongoing retraction of the mainline kills each kite in sequence. A parallel array of tag-lines can kill all kites at once, but considerable force is required. At some point a network of kill-lines becomes a nuisance. Distributed servo actuation becomes favored.
 
Another major kill method is "walking down" a kite. Compared to winching in a kite against the wind only a fraction of effort is needed to trolley downwind pulling the kiteline down until the kite is landed. A related method is for a kite vehicle to run downwind allowing its winch to more easily take in line. Similarly a dipping boom can be repeatedly tipped forward suddenly while winching to reduce the retraction force required. This is how a fishing rod is worked to bring in a fish more powerful than the reel by itself. These are options for the sort of fast evasive maneuver called for by proposed sUAS regs.
 
Large soft kites can be killed by hand when they touch down. One runs up from downwind, just clear of the kite's scope, to wrestle down the fabric into a ball. Grabbing a kite by the tail is a sure way to "trip" it down. Pulling aft lines to windward, slacking windward lines, or pulling in one side all kill a kite.
 
An ancient method is to kill a kite with a kite by cutting its line with a knife or abrasive. A kite pilot may carry a hook-knife or for a huge hawser keep a machete, saw, or ax handy.  Gomberg's quick-release for giant show kites simply releases the line. A cutaway kite drifts downwind landing some ~4x altitude, so it needs considerable space & there is a risk the cut tether can catch on obstacles or drag objects, extending flight. KiteLab's kite killers release a kite's side or fore bridle line by a pin-release actuated by tag-line or remote/auto control. The kite comes right down & remains attached to its anchor.
 
 fairIP/coopIP

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1543 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/19/2010
Subject: Re: SWCC Applicants to be Announced; Commissioners Appointed
Did I miss something?
Screen print of search of www.smallwindcertification.org
 
Will SWCC be welcoming airbrone wind energy technology AWECS turbines?
Or will there be a need for Small AWE Certification Council?
 
Best wishes for the progress on the venture,
JoeF
 
 
 
swcORG18may2010.jpg
 
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1544 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/20/2010
Subject: JoeBen Bevirt

Application for patent filed in 2009

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR OPERATING AND CONTROLLING
AIRBORNE WIND ENERGY GENERATION CRAFT
AND THE GENERATION OF ELECTRICAL ENERGY USING SUCH CRAFT

Click images for full instructions in the application for patent.

Control remarks?  Etc.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1545 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/20/2010
Subject: Apparatus for generating power using jet stream wind power

Another application, different title:

Apparatus for generating power using jet stream wind power
 Filed 2009 APPLICATION

Click images for full instructions.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1546 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/20/2010
Subject: Atmospheric Resources Explorer

Atmospheric Resources Explorer

Tiago Da Costa Duarte Pardal of Lisboa (PT)
and Marco Aurelio Baptista De Almeida Freire of Voorhout (NL)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1547 From: dave santos Date: 5/21/2010
Subject: Ancient Single-Line Kite as a Cybernetic Device
This note is a preamble to advanced AWECS control discussions.
 
                        *   *   *   *   *
 
Ancient Single-Line Kite as a Cybernetic Device
 
Aristotle reasoned a rock "knew" how to move downhill, a view known in robotics as "situated" "embodied" logic. Devices based on such logic are powerful actors in the real-world.
 
A sailor's tell-tale is an embodied fluidic cybernetic device situated in a windfield. Its typically a ribbon or woolly yarn processing invisible wind direction into a clear indication, an optical output. A flag is the "wide screen" display option.
 
The self-flying kite is an even more impressive fluidic robot that performs high-dimensional embodied real-time analog field-computing. This paleo-engineering marvel is still superior to available digital "high-tech". Moreover, the kite does real-world work at monstrous scales with a power-to-weight ratio comparable to an aircraft engine, but without fuel. Arthur C. Clarke might have judged it magic.
 
Particular fluidic feed-back features enable a tethered airfoil to fly itself. Besides the iconic kite tail there are many physical logic tricks to "program" with. Kiteline & bridling are elmental embodied logic. Any sort of logic gate can be contrived from bits of string tied & pulled in certain ways. One might knit a Turing Machine as a sort of Cat's Cradle.
 
KiteLab Ilwaco is carefully layering digital control & artificial intelligence on a foundation of embodied kite logic to create ever more robust AWE. The added interface enables automated data collection. Expert knowledge can now act deliberatively on the reactive kite, extending performance or causing it to fail in unpredictable new ways ;^)
 
NEXT: Analog-to-Digital AWECS Design
 
coopIP/fairIP

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1550 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/21/2010
Subject: Lamar Baker's Ezekial Saw The Wheel, 1943

 

Lamar Baker's Ezekial Saw The Wheel,
1943
Oil and tempera on canvas.
36 x 42 in. Columbus Museam, GA.

A Force for Change: African American Art and the Julius Rosenwald Fund

http://www.montclair-art.com/press_spertus/   is the source page.

 

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1551 From: Bob Stuart Date: 5/21/2010
Subject: Re: Lamar Baker's Ezekial Saw The Wheel, 1943
Remarkable eyesight.  Zeke saw a double step-down drive for a high-torque window  with a very high loading on the secondary belt, and heavenly locomotive oilers in their coveralls, but no  bearings  for  them to  attend to.  I wonder if  he also saw it in triplicate, as we do.

Bob
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1552 From: dave santos Date: 5/21/2010
Subject: Re: Lamar Baker's Ezekial Saw The Wheel, 1943
The artist's concept clearly depicts a pulley-loop groundgen prophecy more or less exactly like KiteMotor1. The cherubim kite-pilots are realistic even if modern wingsuits are not yet so picturesque. Apparently the FAA granted full airworthiness certification for operation over populated areas.
 
Its the divine counter-vision to the "stealth-bombers-on-extension-cords" over a desolated landscape shown during Google/Makani's TED Talk ;^)
 



Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1553 From: Doug Date: 5/22/2010
Subject: Anyone going to Dallas?
Hi I'm wondering if any AWE people will be at AWEA Windpower 2010 in Dallas next week? I'll be there Monday & Tuesday. Give me a ring if you are there and want to say hello.
Doug Selsam
cel 714-749-3909
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1554 From: dave santos Date: 5/22/2010
Subject: Lifter-Kite Overview
Self-flying lifter-kites are a basic tool for current AWE. They even lift sweeping fly-gen hot-wings without resort to fancy avionics. Three kinds of lifter-kites are the workhorses; Parafoils, Morse Sleds, & Deltas. Each has advantages & faults as listed below. The sled & foil were discussed extensively in previous posts, so the Delta description is more detailed.
 
Parafoils
 
Jalbert began as an early American aviator who then worked on barrage balloons, inventing the kytoon. Late in life he invented his real masterpiece, the ram-air soft-wing known as the parafoil. What makes the parafoil revolutionary is that the faster its driven the harder its structure pressurizes. All other designs are speed-limited by acting progressively floppier at higher speed. In his final years Jalbert developed flapper-valve inlets that hold pressure in during upset. This is the most advanced of all soft kites, even suitable as a water-kite.
 
Great parafoils exist in both self-flying single-line & powerful fast-sweeping multiline traction versions. As a lifter it can pull very hard for its area.
 
Parafoils are formed into high quality airfoils at super-low weight to wing area (double-skin). A defect of parafoils is that relaunching from the ground usually requires assistance, but lifted up by a wingtip from a Morse sled (as a self-looping parafoil) bypasses the problem. Parafoils may be the ultimate scalable design; stock versions have bigger wing area than a 747 & the largest kite ever was far bigger still.
 
Morse Sled
 
No kite is more capable with such cheap light "untailored" (flat) construction. The quality of the airfoil is not so high, so the sled is not suitable for high-speed sweeping, but being single-skin gives the kite the lowest wing-loading of any, a key virtue.
 
While prone to temporary collapse in dirty wind, the kite is so light it seldom crashes due to collapse, but re-inflates promptly. An extraordinary quality of the type is its reliable ability to self-relaunch. It can scale greatly by its tensarity principle (whisker on a ram-airbeam), but not so much as a parafoil.
 
While most Morse Sleds have tails, some do well without them by being cut a bit longer; i use a tailless Kayak Kite for kayaking here on the Lower Columbia River with good results.
 
Delta
 
Tailless Delta Kites are a modern type developed on the Texas Coast. They are the dominant toy kite design; exceptional fliers in a very wide wind range; cheap & simple to produce.  These qualities make them attractive as lifters in small to medium scale AWE. The design is practical up to "hang glider scale" before stick construction becomes too fragile & unwieldy. Beyond that size soft kites like the sled & parafoil are better.
 
A delta's frame is somewhat floppy to make it compliant to small-scale turbulence. Loose wingtip fabric flaps contribute to its "snowplow stability", where a leading wing's drag pulls it back to align the kite with shifted wind. The prominent fabric keel damps yaw oscillation. While tails are common on small deltas to delay the onset of looping in rising wind, the tailless original is ideal for aggregation into vast robust structures like close-packed arches & trains, without the bother of tails hung-up on adjacent lines.
 
A quality delta makes a fine addition to any kiter's quiver. I've flown a Gomberg Spotlight Delta for several years now, souped up with a water-relaunch nose float, ram-air stub-tail & elastic aft-bridle. Its flyable up to gale conditions. A little delta (18" WS) i happened across has a very long integrated flat tail (20ft) giving it the form of a planarium worm. Verily its Hargrave's vision of future worm kites. With a bit of ballast far down the tail & long ribbons added, it will fly in a gale even though its so small.
 
For light-wind flying, X-Kites makes a great PVC & fiberglass delta that sells for about $4. It flies as well as "pro" UL kites costing 20 times more. Gayla is the original delta maker (the dimestore kite of my childhood) & still makes vast quantities of variants selling as cheap as a dollar or two. I harvest them for array experiments from trees with a long pole after Austin's kitefest, which is even cheaper & reduces litter.
 
coopIP/fairIP

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1555 From: dave santos Date: 5/22/2010
Subject: Analog-to-Digital Kiting
The simplest kite state-machine is a binary pair- Flying or Not-Flying. A workable sensor is a contact switch lever at the anchor-point that trips when the kiteline lays down on the surface. One nice experiment is to let a Morse Sled land & self re-launch for extended sessions while recording state against a time-base. The next logical elaboration of the state-machine is to measure the wind-speed dimension while tracking kite-state. This allows failures & latencies to be sorted from the data stream. The Beaufort Scale is a fine default minimal granularity assumption.
 
From there the state machine becomes more application or operation driven. One might care most about certain dimensions like wind direction, altitude, kiteline state, generation, etc., but the essential task is to minimize the number & precision of dimensions lest the state machine grow intractable. Intractability takes many forms, but complex processing in real-time is a common hurdle. High dimensional combinatorics burdens processing. Sensor fusion challenges the designer. Uncertainty of every kind limits reliable performance.
 
The natural wind-field is a major uncertainty. Active control is only as good as one's wind sensing & modeling, but both engineering functions are weak at present. A basic wind state model is around seven dimensions. More complex versions soon become intractable.
 
Much work is ahead to digitize kites. A practical hint is to use videogrammetry to gather experimental data in mass-parallel. Video provides an inherent discrete time-base, enables space measurement with color-coded reference markings, & the visual frame easily includes real-time instrument read-outs in the foreground. Post-processing of the image stream automates digitization. Eventually one may migrate to simpler sensing & process fast enough to automate acceptable actuation in real-time.
 
A most useful single-actuation dimension (or degree-of-freedom (DOF)) to automate is yaw output as this is useful to resist wind veering upset & lock-out looping. AoA is a primary control input for power modulation & even killing, but an elastic aft-bridle can embody the logic to reduce AoA in gusts. Yaw, roll & pitch mixing are desirable for kiteplane aerobatics.
 
NEXT: Critical Reliability of Autonomous AWECS
 
coopIP/fairIP
 
 

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1556 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/23/2010
Subject: 2003 article by Wayne German

Flying Without Fuel by Tacking in the Air
 (And other Objectives)

 By 

 Wayne German,
2003

Contact Wayne for NDA to use any novelty of his findings.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1557 From: dave santos Date: 5/24/2010
Subject: Patents v. People
Can one create core AWE knowledge, give it to the needy, avoid patent hassle & cost, block profiteers, & still make a living? In the AWE community players with deep pockets are racing to patent hundreds of ideas, most of them obvious, hoping some will prove to be valuable monopolies. Far more developers are rightfully concerned that such efforts create unfairness & uncertainty, ultimately slowing widespread adoption & investment in the new methods.
 
The patent system was founded to spur a profit-motive in small inventors while serving the public good. It has evolved into a greedy game stacked toward highly capitalized corporations with legal armies. The public good is trampled when the losers are ordinary consumers forced to over-pay & the poor are forced to go without. The good news is that humans really do invent best out of love. New kinds of shared IP, like open-source (in all its flavors), copy-left, released patent pools, coopIP, & fairIP can bypass & even supplant the broken patent system.
 
Sherman Anti-Trust law is still a vital tool to curb major IP abuse. A civil judge, jury, or regulatory authority will occasionally punish industrialists acting noncompetitively. Copyrights (including copy-left) are substantial IP in an age of digital trails & hungry lawyers. Design Copyrights are a smell test; an obvious knock-off is legally actionable. Trade-Marks establish strong identity for those of good repute. Moral Rights have been around for over a hundred years & increasingly grant creators a conscionable claim on the uses of their work. Public relations drive high-profile corporate behavior. A savvy company shies from screwing a little guy if bad publicity will result.
 
We are still left with the collective responsibility to work around or shoot down bad patents. This link is a good how-to intro-
 
 
 

 

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1558 From: spacecannon@san.rr.com Date: 5/24/2010
Subject: Re: Patents v. People
Dave S.,
I understand your frustration but with out a patent investors dont want to invest, and then you are back to zero.
I file my patent to have some freedom, for a limited time, from competition allowing me to pay back the people that invested in my idea. Too many on this forum and other forums trying to create something, put down capitalism, but its the best thing for humanity, history has proven this.
Spacecannon


---- dave santos <santos137@yahoo.com
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1559 From: dave santos Date: 5/24/2010
Subject: Re: Patents v. People
Spacecannon,
 
Far from being "frustrated", i already enjoy & eagerly look forward to fighting high-stakes mine-field & junk patents. Your investors may see the AWE market won by investment in public-domain art & that a preoccupation with picking patent winners was a trap. An average patent battle these days costs millions.
 
Good luck with your "smallholder" patent, you have worked hard to earn it. My complaints are directed at patent abuse underwritten by 800lb gorillas like Google.org,
 
daveS


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1560 From: Hardensoft International Limited Date: 5/25/2010
Subject: Google.org
It is unfortunate that Google seems to have 'missed' it in the AWE fray. Yet, most people including my humble self appreciate the greater good Google has done our world outside AWE.
I will suggest we be less harsh in our criticisms.
Regards.
JohnO


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1561 From: Hardensoft International Limited Date: 5/25/2010
Subject: Re: Patents v. People
Thanks, DaveS.
Airborne Wind Energy Industry Association - AWEIA ( www.aweia.org ) is positioned to champion this cause with the support of all. I am not sure this forum will be the right and proper place to share the burden. Committed and registered members of AWEIA will in my opinion best share the responsibility under the Industry Association's banner.
Regards.
JohnO
president protem - AWEIA


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1562 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/25/2010
Subject: Soaren

Introduction to  Soaren

via updated

Tethered Aviation 

 

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1563 From: Doug Date: 5/26/2010
Subject: Re: Patents v. People (or patents by and for people)
My experience with patents says, if I had it to do over, I'd work more on the turbines first, get everything worked out with the machines, then file patents later, and the patents would be better because they would include the improvements.
I detect the phenomenon here of people feeling somehow intimidated by the patent process, or feeling "on the outside looking in", that sort of thing.

But the points all seem moot in that, without a system for sale that is a reliable and economic energy solution in any way, how are the existing patents stopping or slowing any progress?
Mostly it looks like one more excuse to remain forever in the all-talk format, lamenting a system that, while not perfect, has been well-accepted and utilized by industry for hundreds of years, during wghich we have gone from riding horses to space travel in the amount of time where civilizations normally undergo little if any change at all.

Please realize, any patent holder is paving the way for your success too, in that if any system is designed that utilizes someone else's patented idea, one may engage that patentee as an ally and go forward in a better position than if no patents had been filed. The inventor paves the way for others to drive down their road of innovation. Fair I.P. was the reason the patent system was started. Sure the system is not perfect and if anyone gets frustrated with it, I am at the front of the line, but I would think of patents like traffic lights: They help regulate the flow of progress. Endlessly complaining about the mere existence of patents is not going to get anyone anywhere in this field in my opinion.

Patents seem to be like windmills in a neighborhood:
People who own one love them and people who don't, don't.
Patents are like traffic lights. Yes they can be frustrating and can slow or stop progress momentarily, but do they stop you from driving across the U.S.? Would you say "We can't ever drive across the country because at last calculation there are 1000 traffic lights that must be crossed, all designed to completely stop your progress"?
No that would be silly - the traffic lights actually help you get across safely, while indeed causing some momentary frustration and delay.

Fair I.P. has to start with I.P. period.
Doug Selsam
714-992-5594


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1564 From: dave santos Date: 5/26/2010
Subject: Re: Patents v. People (or patents by and for people)
My critique of patents only applies to the negative effects, which are widely acknowledged. Even Microsoft is agitating for junk-patent reform. Before patents existed people still invented quite nicely. FairIP/coopIP is voluntary (honor system) & does not rest on legal monopoly, but formal ethics.
 
Also, capitalism has terrible instances; like slavery, war profiteering, & consumer defrauding. What is proposed is a reformed capitalism, based on sound business ethics, combined with Culp's "feral capitalism" AWE, where a garage start-up can topple giants by pure merit, not IP gaming.
 
Note: While Google.org's narrow weak & stealthy AWE play has earned ridicule, we can still hope they reverse course & broaden investment to include academia & the many worthy efforts outside the "connected" Makani circle.
 
 
 
 
 



Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1565 From: Hardensoft International Limited Date: 5/27/2010
Subject: Still On Google

DaveS noted
"
Note: While Google.org's narrow weak & stealthy AWE play has earned ridicule, we can still hope they reverse course & broaden investment to include academia & the many worthy efforts outside the "connected" Makani circle."
 
I believe Google will indeed do better availing more hands their generous support than engaging in a 'competition' as it presently seems in an area outside their core competency.
 
JohnO


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1566 From: harry valentine Date: 5/27/2010
Subject: Re: Still On Google

 Perhaps Google allowed themselves to be (MIS)guided by somebody's impeccable academic credentials. Very few successful pieces of technology had their origins in academia . . . . most successful technological innovations came courtesy of the Thomas Edisons and Henry Fords . . . . hands-on entrepreneurial types who built workable pieces of technology that became successful.
 
 
Perhaps the most successful breakthroughs in airborne wind power will have origins outside of academia.
 
 
Harry

 


MSN Dating: Find someone special. Start now. Start now!
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1567 From: Doug Date: 5/27/2010
Subject: Re: Patents v. People (or patents by and for people)
I agree that patents can have a downside.
Witness the pharmaceutical "industry" where well-accepted and effective herbal remedies that have served mankind for thousands of years are declared illegal, and used for nefarious underground profiteering at the highest levels, while inferior but newly-patented synthetic substitutes are promoted endlessly to doctors, until their patents expire, whereupon newer, and even more inferior synthetic substitutes are promoted directly to the consumer on TV, in ubiquitous ads that seem designed to appeal to mental patients, and to recruit/create new ones.
I guess every good thing has a bad side. Build a bridge but workers get killed in accidents. Manufacture cars so we can get around, yet they are the leading cause of death for young people. At the same time, the miles driven are far safer than using horses. So in the field of patents, like everything else, we take the bad with the good.
Superturbine(R) technology is now patented and/or patent pending in the U.S., Canada, Australia, India, all countries of the European Union, and China.
Doug Selsam
http://www.USWINDLABS.com

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1568 From: dave santos Date: 5/27/2010
Subject: Re: Still On Google
Harry,
 
Google.org is said to have picked the Makani team based on social connections with a Google founder, but the full story is lost in the stealth culture. Far from "impeccable", the academic credential of the the former Chief Scientist was a Doctorate in Media Arts from MIT's Media Lab, which did enhance Makani's media splash & helped bring visibility to the AWE field, but was apparently not the right stuff to ace fundamental aerospace.
 
The current Makani Stanford PhD CTO's background is in astronomy hardware & his deepest prior "aerospace" experience seems to have been a poorly conceived water-skiing kite. These are not disqualifications nor impeccable credentials. In fact, many prestigious universities have become academic puppy-mills cranking out vast numbers of mediocre PhDs. Joby has gone on a PhD newbie buying spree, even as credentialism sinks deeper in crisis.
 
Academia does have a distinguished record in parallel with hard-boiled R & D. Computer science, aerospace, & biotech all have strong academic underpinnings. Look what Dr. Goddard accomplished. Its unlikely the Wright Brothers would have succeeded without the mentor role of Octave Chanute, a practicing engineer with much relevant published research.
 
What we urgently need academia for is the independent validation of AWE's best concepts free of marketing investment bias. A little money put in the hands of grad students goes very far as the parent institution represents a huge subsidy in facilities & basic life-support for the scholar. Google could have funded a vast amount of academic brain-power with the money Makani happily blew on Maui research, golden compensation packages, & prestige real estate leasing.
 
In particular TUDelft & LeuvenU are academic examples of quality focused AWE study. Our own Cristina & Ken are examples of high profile academics leading the informing of the world as to AWE's potential. Good academics are quite accessible & work well with others compared to stealthy Venture Capitalists intent on commercial monopoly. For my part, i am a proud undergrad at the University of Texas for over thirty years ;^)
 
daveS



Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1569 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/27/2010
Subject: Malcolm Phillips
Welcome  member Malcolm Phillips Click through image for full instructions.

That click through is one patent filed in 2002 and issued in 2005.

 

Here is another from Malcolm Phillips, filed in 2005 and  issued in 2007:

Click:

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1570 From: dave santos Date: 5/27/2010
Subject: Origins & Dynamics of KitePlanes & Tethered Flying-Wings
High-performance AWE Kiteplanes of varied design are envisioned by TUDelft, Joby Energy, Makani Power, & others. A KitePlane is a fixed/rigid-wing aircraft of conventional configuration designed to operate on a tether. A flying wing is an airplane-as-pure-wing that trades control & stability for maximal lift over drag. A tethered flying-wing will likely be the ultimate kiteplane when avionic control is perfected.
 
The earliest known kiteplanes are a handful of drawings & surviving examples of large Maori kites with superb high-aspect ratio wings. These spectacular high-speed fliers' tendency-to-crash was used for divination. Legend relates that spears were affixed to giant versions at public ceremonies & it was divine judgment who got impaled.
 
The modern kiteplane dates to almost a century ago when airplanes & gliders began to be towed aloft to ferry or launch. The tethered flight modes attracted less attention being secondary to modes like soaring. Far from the Kiting Dark Age some commentators have painted, this early period fully explored kiteplane performance, from very hot flying wing gliders up to the jumbo scale of the Gigant cargo glider.
 
Kiteplanes where found workable but dangerous when control forces were overwhelmed, a condition called Lock-Out. The forces on a surging kiteplane easily pulled wings off or parted the tether in many accidents. Sport gliding still generally employs tethered launch. Great care is required to launch safely. Pilots depend on reliable quick-release to allow safe landing in glider mode. Banner towing is tether-intensive aviation. Similarly model aeronautics uses tethered launch by high-speed winch or bungee. A common glitch is to get stuck on the primitive launch hook. One soon learns the difficulties of a safely landing a hot glider while still on a tether.
 
My direct experience with kiteplane dynamics began with being towed aloft in a glider at an early age. I was exposed to many aviation kiteplane niche applications, like the banner towing business. Later i developed dozens of small tethered hot flying-wings in the 80s & 90s to demonstrate aeronautic principles at schools & science centers. I met & began to work with the amazing Brooks Coleman (ZapKites) at this time. Since childhood he had made his own flying-wing control line fliers.
 
We worked together on many cool mini-airshows, which even included early quad-rotor electric VTOL. The culmination of our kiteplane-mode aircraft was the flight of two 3m WS radio controlled aircraft over downtown Austin, funded by the city's cultural arts program. Model aviation guru, George Parks, was a key mentor. He taught us many things, like mixed turns using elevons alone. Many of the tethered flying-wing variants we flew in the 80s are uncanny precursors to Makani's kiteplane.
 
In our current AWE circle the leading kiteplane guru is aeronautical engineer Dale Kramer, a soaring champ & record-holder who intends to demonstrate Free-Flight soon with a tethered high-performance glider/soft-kite combo. Countless aviators & designers have extensive experience with kiteplane dynamics. You just have to know where to look to find vast prior art. Kiteplane-based AWECS R & D can tap into this talent pool to progress more surely & rapidly.
 
A likely key to perfected kiteplanes will be a variable tow-point. Both "tow-high" & "tow-low" modes are desirable in some apps & side towing is possibly useful. Combinations of moving the tow point along tracks & dynamic bridles could serve. The ability to release or pickup a tether, with unencumbered take-off & landing, is desirable. A major failure mode to worry about is fouling a kiteplane-mounted flygen turbine with its tether. Shrouding may be required.
 
fairIP/coopIP

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1571 From: harry valentine Date: 5/27/2010
Subject: Re: Still On Google
Hi Dave,
 
 
I had been led to believe that Makani's was a MIT PHd in engineering . . .  your clarification certainly goes far to explain Makani's debacle. I hope that Joby does not go the same route . . . there is an urgent need for good, credible, high elevation wind power conversion technology.
 
Good credible academics such as the research staff at Delft and Leuven along with Chris and Ken seem to be becoming the minority in the world of Phd grads.
 
 
Harry

 

To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
From: santos137@yahoo.com
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 10:35:54 -0700
Subject: RE: [AWECS] Still On Google

 
Harry,
 
Google.org is said to have picked the Makani team based on social connections with a Google founder, but the full story is lost in the stealth culture. Far from "impeccable" , the academic credential of the the former Chief Scientist was a Doctorate in Media Arts from MIT's Media Lab, which did enhance Makani's media splash & helped bring visibility to the AWE field, but was apparently not the right stuff to ace fundamental aerospace.
 
The current Makani Stanford PhD CTO's background is in astronomy hardware & his deepest prior "aerospace" experience seems to have been a poorly conceived water-skiing kite. These are not disqualifications nor impeccable credentials. In fact, many prestigious universities have become academic puppy-mills cranking out vast numbers of mediocre PhDs. Joby has gone on a PhD newbie buying spree, even as credentialism sinks deeper in crisis.
 
Academia does have a distinguished record in parallel with hard-boiled R & D. Computer science, aerospace, & biotech all have strong academic underpinnings. Look what Dr. Goddard accomplished. Its unlikely the Wright Brothers would have succeeded without the mentor role of Octave Chanute, a practicing engineer with much relevant published research.
 
What we urgently need academia for is the independent validation of AWE's best concepts free of marketing investment bias. A little money put in the hands of grad students goes very far as the parent institution represents a huge subsidy in facilities & basic life-support for the scholar. Google could have funded a vast amount of academic brain-power with the money Makani happily blew on Maui research, golden compensation packages, & prestige real estate leasing.
 
In particular TUDelft & LeuvenU are academic examples of quality focused AWE study. Our own Cristina & Ken are examples of high profile academics leading the informing of the world as to AWE's potential. Good academics are quite accessible & work well with others compared to stealthy Venture Capitalists intent on commercial monopoly. For my part, i am a proud undergrad at the University of Texas for over thirty years ;^)
 
daveS

 




MSN Dating: Find someone special. Start now. Start now!
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1572 From: dave santos Date: 5/27/2010
Subject: Re: Still On Google
Harry,
 
In fairness, there have been some impressive newly-minted engineering PhDs toiling in the "top" AWE companies. All are nice bright young people, but its the classic trap of Phaeton or Icarus, they take on too awesome a flight challenge in prematurity. If only there were not those stupid NDAs (non-disclosure agreements) what a story some would tell.
 
The hiring continues. Count on Joby's recently recruited PhD aerospace-roboticists to be privately freaking as they trip into intractablities of hard-avionics AWECS design. AWE dev runs on hamster years (30-1), so lets expect many of these kids to wise up fast. Especially watch for where the very best of the non-equity galley-slaves jump, that will be a good party...
 
daveS
 
 
 

 
 


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1573 From: dimitri.cherny Date: 5/28/2010
Subject: Re: Still On Google
Come on guys. Sounds like just a big bunch of sour grapes.

It will require the efforts of all kinds of people to pull off what we're all trying to create.

Inclusion of academics, newly minted young PhDs, seat-of-the-pants garage engineers, experienced aeronautical engineers, deep-pocketed investors, smooth-talking marketeers, and yes even patent attorneys is the only way any of us will make an AWE system a commercial success.

Give it a break and get back to work.

- Dimitri

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1574 From: Dan Parker Date: 5/28/2010
Subject: Re: Still On Google
Dimitri,  
 
        "Give it a break and get back to work." Righto!
 
 

To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
From: dimitri.cherny@yahoo.com
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 12:29:18 +0000
Subject: Re: [AWECS] Still On Google

 
Come on guys. Sounds like just a big bunch of sour grapes.

It will require the efforts of all kinds of people to pull off what we're all trying to create.

Inclusion of academics, newly minted young PhDs, seat-of-the-pants garage engineers, experienced aeronautical engineers, deep-pocketed investors, smooth-talking marketeers, and yes even patent attorneys is the only way any of us will make an AWE system a commercial success.

Give it a break and get back to work.

- Dimitri



The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with Hotmail. Get busy.
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1575 From: Hardensoft International Limited Date: 5/28/2010
Subject: Public versus Private Posts
Thanks Dimitri,
It is important that we remind ourselves the purpose of this forum - To advance the Rapid Development Of Airbone Wind Energy at all scales through open sharing of knowledge.
Occasionally, contributions in response to specific individual contributions can be personal. It is vital however that the forum be not turned to a private medium of exchanges that are best handled one-on-one through personal direct emails.
We have trusted old members of the forum to know the rules but it seems all need to be reminded yet again.
Sincere regards. 


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 1576 From: dave santos Date: 5/28/2010
Subject: Re: Still On Google
Dimitri,
 
Its far too early for sour grapes. There is nothing more wonderful than this period of exploration.
 
Your anti-critique post is a valued critique, never mind the irony. We only really disagree on what the actual problems are. We agree on one main point- not all actions in the field contribute to the most positive possible outcome. Let time decide whether the AWE hype bubble or unwelcome critique proves the greater problem.
 
This is a great moment for you to report Highest Wind's latest progress & not just critique. I am preparing to share some new work as well...
 
daveS