Messages in AirborneWindEnergy group.                           AWES11328to11377 Page 123 of 440.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11328 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/4/2014
Subject: Re: Testing and Reporting Mothra (for Pierre)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11329 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/4/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11330 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11331 From: dougselsam Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: hemp cultivation in U.S. now legal again

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11332 From: dougselsam Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Mothra-Tech as an AWES Basis (review)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11333 From: dougselsam Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: flying rope... not a wind up is it?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11334 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11335 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11336 From: dave santos Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Testing and Reporting Mothra (for Pierre)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11337 From: dave santos Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: hemp cultivation in U.S. now legal again

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11338 From: dave santos Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11339 From: dave santos Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Initial Estimate of Large-Scale Circle-Belay Speed, (and Further Sca

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11340 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11341 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11342 From: dougselsam Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11343 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11344 From: dave santos Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11345 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11346 From: dave santos Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11347 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11348 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11349 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11350 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11351 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11352 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Is the present forum an AWEforum or a simple forum of kites?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11353 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11354 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Ever-Raining Kite System, an ever-giving AWES

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11355 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11356 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11357 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Is the present forum an AWEforum or a simple forum of kites?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11358 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11359 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11360 From: dougselsam Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11361 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11362 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Ever-Raining Kite System, an ever-giving AWES

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11363 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Ever-Raining Kite System, an ever-giving AWES

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11364 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Ever-Raining Kite System, an ever-giving AWES

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11365 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Chinese Leadership in KIS Gigawatt AWE?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11366 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Giancarlo Zanetti | Zanettistudios | TWIND(R)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11367 From: dave santos Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Is the present forum an AWEforum or a simple forum of kites?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11368 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Jianmin and associates

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11369 From: dave santos Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11370 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Yongping, Li

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11371 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: HUANG JIAYUE and FENG XUAN

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11372 From: dave santos Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Great AWE Debate (Engineering-Science Winning)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11373 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Is the present forum an AWEforum or a simple forum of kites?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11374 From: dave santos Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: DIY Solar-Powered AWES "Obstruction Lighting"

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11375 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11376 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Great AWE Debate (Engineering-Science Winning)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11377 From: dave santos Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Is the present forum an AWEforum or a simple forum of kites?




Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11328 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/4/2014
Subject: Re: Testing and Reporting Mothra (for Pierre)

DaveS,

 

"Other recent demos include pumping air and hydraulic fluid, but you must have missed them. 

Its really your job to keep up with Forum news, rather than need others to repeat the news to you."
 
Probably Mothra has an electric conversion system as generator to extract energy from oscillations. I am sorry I have not seen explains or shemas on the numerous posts. But with the new definition of AWES, like all kites Mothra is already a conversion system, generator or not: it can make noise, towing on the anchors, tracting, being a sport for users to turn it face to wind direction...
 
PierreB

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11329 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/4/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Hi Joe,

 

The machine I show is only a kite piloted according to a small radius,making a small loop like a rotation. It is not an AWES since in the state it does not generate any form of energy, electricity or another. I do not agree the new definition like all kites are AWES. I explain it by the non-possibility for Mothra and other DaveS' realizations to become real AWES generating some energy used for all you want: by a "wider" definition of AWES, both all things and nothing are AWES.

 

So I repeat the machine I show generates some force but no energy for the actual step. An Airborne Wind Energy System being not able to generate some energy is a non-sense.

 

PierreB    



Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11330 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Pierre, 

        Not sure of the next step on this. The retort presented denies a fact: "but no energy" when the fact is that there is energy conversion and the energy is doing new things; some of those energy conversions and their works were spelled out; not all conversions were spelled out, but some.  The law of conservation of energy means that AWES never "create" energy, but only convert extant energy from one form to another. A simple kite does that. The shown looper seems to even be a dancing super shower of the fundamentals of conversion, that is, making one form of energy into another form of energy (never creating energy.)  Also, there was given an opportunity to have "not the AWES of particular sort that is in the planning."  But that opportunity is being set aside.   It can be noted forever about this discontinuity in respect of your position.  

      There are very many "steps" involved in the dynamics of the shown machine; vast list of energy conversions are occurring doing work (placing the energy into another form ...further conversions). 

      In the face of apparent contradiction and insistence, it seems that attention just on the apparent (and perhaps actual) contradiction might give some future resolution for affecting the definition of an AWES. Again, consider letting there be families or types or categories of AWES within the superset of AWES. 

Best, 

~ JoeF

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11331 From: dougselsam Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: hemp cultivation in U.S. now legal again
Sustainable fibers are coming back!
http://www.nasdaq.com/press-release/hemp-inc-americas-first-allindustrial-hemp-public-company-applauds-the-us-house-of-representatives-20140131-00032

LAS VEGAS, Jan. 31, 2014 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- For the first time in decades, the Federal government is allowing farmers to cultivate hemp. As of Wednesday, January 29, 2014, pursuant to the passage of the farm bill, the cultivation of industrial hemp is legal on a Federal level and is clearing the way for industrial hemp pilot programs in states such as Colorado, Washington, California, Kentucky, Maine, Montana, North Dakota, Oregon, Vermont and West Virginia, where growing the plant is legal.
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11332 From: dougselsam Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Mothra-Tech as an AWES Basis (review)
Hi Pierre:
I am economically viable?  Wow, thanks, I had no idea! (pulls empty pockets inside-out, shrugs)
I guess I DO finally have a turbine model that is economically useful.
Key factors:
1) reasonable cost to produce
2) reasonable cost to package
3) reasonable cost to ship
4) useful amount of electrical output
5) longevity, so it can run for years unattended, due to:
     a) smooth, balanced operation
     b) extremely hard finish on the blades (DuPont Imron Aircraft Paint)
     c) leading edge tape
     d) finely-tuned overspeed protection
The last item is perhaps the most important.
It took years to get all these features into a single machine.
Out of hundreds of models you can find in small turbines, few will turn out to survive the first brutal windstorm.  The SuperTwin(TM) model nowadays eats severe storms for breakfast.  Also looking to offer a kit for home-builders, even for a single-rotor version.

But, Pierre, most of that really has that much to do with my AWE designs.  The AWE designs have not been worked out into fine-tuned products yet.
:)
Doug S.
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11333 From: dougselsam Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: flying rope... not a wind up is it?
I think Joe made a great comment that the tether itself could be designed to not sag, but even lift.  This is not the first time this has occurred to me anyway.  Usually, one ends up imagining a tether that is hard to distinguish from a stack of kites.  That leads one to think of actually USING that stack of kites to make power.  If the kites can move, then maybe that tether can be the turbine, in the form of a laddermill.  If the "kites" can spin, then maybe you have a version of SuperTurbine(R).  If they go fast enough, one might abandon the term "kite" in lieu of "blades".  In any case, it is a great point that a tether could potentially be made to lift, rather than sag.  Someone probably already mentioned this, but Roy Mueller's Skybow resembles this description in some ways.
:)
Doug S.
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11334 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto
For the hot seat, the following is up:
====================================================
AWES airborne wind energy systems
= One-Tenth-Scale AWES SeeHERE
= Quarter-Scale AWES
= Full-Scale AWES
= An "AWES" is a airborne system that interacts with the wind with the result that the wind is slowed while the AWES converts some of the wind's kinetic energy to other forms of energy (kinetic energy of AWES parts, potential energy of AWES parts, heat of AWES parts, for example; AWES never "create" energy, as that would counter the law of conservation of energy. The AWES energies often do works in the AWES itself and while so working effect changes in the wind and other parts of the environment that may be connected to the AWES. When the AWES is a kite system, then the energies gained from conversions of the wind's kinetic energy may work to alter the anchor systems. AWES may fulfill practical needs and tasks; "practical" could be subjective; "need" could be subjective.
== Various people look to AWES' converted energy to fulfill their particular needs and objectives that well may differ from the needs and objectives of other users of the energies involved. High emphasis on "fulfilling needs and tasks" by use of AWES is forming an era "K3" for kiting, though there are some AWES that are not kites. Every flying kite system is an AWES as such systems convert some of the wind's energy and then uses some of such energy to do work; momentarily some of the energy is placed as potential energy like in the kept altitude of the mass of the kite system's masses, or in the kept stretch of the elastic portions of the parts of the system. Some people are wanting to build into the kite systems parts that focus on converting the gained energy into noise more than would be common, or into light more than would be common, or gross mass motion more than would be common, or electricity more than would be common, etc.
== Some of the users of kite systems have in mind a particular result of their choosing and refuse to append "AWES" on a machine until their particular favored result is accomplished; such position disrespects the inherent core of a flying kite system which already fulfills the definition of an airborne wind energy system. Ultimate aims of fulfilling a defined task may well sort any "definition controversy" in the related technical community's text. Identifying precise tasks or applications for a kite system to fulfill may give clarity to developments. There are thousands of identified tasks that AWES are invited to fulfill by proposal, and hundreds of identified tasks being fulfilled throughout the world every day. And so era K3 grows and evolves by way of modifications to AWES to fulfill certain tasks. [A hint of definitional struggle may be had by visiting the thread of posted messages HERE. Notes from others are welcome.]
=== Some tasks are seemingly more popular than others, but such does not invalidate niche applications that may not be so popular.
=== Some tasks involve the holding of parts in the kite system that generate electricity at a robust level more than occurs without attention to have special parts like highly evolved electric generators; such electric generators may be integrated into aloft parts of the kite system or in the resistive anchor parts of the kite system. When such highly advanced electric generators are integrated in a complex kite system, then the wind's energy converted by the kite system is channeled by design to drive the electric generator; such channeled energy is not then available to the kite system to do other works that might otherwise occur. Energy is not created, but only conserved in various ways. This sector of AWE is receiving investment funds from robust sources, partly with the hope in mind that AWES of this sector might go a good distance in reducing the need for fossil fuels in the world.

~ JoeF
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11335 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Added for the same hot seat: 

=================================

=== Another highly popular task is "pulling things" where things are other than the pulling around the shaft of an electric generator, but rather like pulling a boat,  kiteboarder, plow, ground scraper, cart, etc. These AWES specialize in channeling energy converter from the wind into overcoming the friction and resistance of objects to be moved about the sky or ground or water. The pulled objects move and the energy is found converted into other forms like potential energy, heat of friction, turbulence of waters, kinetic energy of the moved masses, etc.  Some of such "pulling" and generation of heat occurs even in the most simple kite. Cargo ships are being pulled; such replaces some use of fossil fuels. Kiteboarders are being pulled about by AWES; and when such activity replaces such activity as racing fossil-fuel vehicles, then some headway seems to be made to reduce use of fossil fuels. 


~ JoeF

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11336 From: dave santos Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Testing and Reporting Mothra (for Pierre)
Pierre,

So JoeF, founder of KiteSA fifty years ago, and DaveS, resident scholar and volunteer curator at WKM, have confirmed that all kites fly by AWE, as a major AWES class (Kite Energy).

You seem ready to understand that AWE is more general than "direct electrical generation only", and that it develops only as fast as the best experimenters can manage. Help Doug and MikeB understand that undue impatience only makes naive AWE skeptics unhappy, while the steady daily progress keeps the diligent developers happy.

Wait for giant flapping Mothras to be tested as electrical power plants in due time. A current delay factor is that prototype electrical AWES cost about a dollar-per-watt, and multiple incremental prototypes are needed. So to demonstrate large electrical versions requires a larger budget than kPower currently has. 

Content yourself that small flapping wings* have already generated electricity (since 2010), as a creative feat by domain experts, rather than ridicule the pioneering phase of work.

Limited funding does not mean that we are stalled as agile-engineers, since there are so many small cheap experiments still needed to build knowledge and skills before the next new AWES testing phase emerges (The 100M "Fraunhofer Plan"),

daveS

* Recent flapping wing Encampment experiments set opposed flipwings horizontally as "arches", producing strong measured defections of spring-scales consistent with vertical versions, TUDelft oscillating kite data, UMaine wing data, Zhang Labs theory, and related models. Next expect small electrical AWES testing on the flapping arch principle to model potential larger versions.

We are still waiting for you to document small-scale WheelWind progress in any detail, so you can be congratulated.


On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 9:58 PM, Pierre BENHAIEM <pierre.benhaiem@orange.fr
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11337 From: dave santos Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: hemp cultivation in U.S. now legal again
Doug,

An international market for legally importable hemp already exists, so US Ag policy hardly matters. Please try to only report high-value AWES news and R&D on the Forum. You are years overdue to report any actual "Father of AWE" progress. Instead, you relentlessly spam us with sour-grapes and off-topic content like this thread.

US Ag news is properly discussed here-


daveS


On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 7:14 AM, "dougselsam@yahoo.com" <dougselsam@yahoo.com
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11338 From: dave santos Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto
Clarification for Pierre:

"AWES" is the term created and designated by the US FAA for AWE in regulated airspace system. The FAA does not distinguish Electrical AWES from Mechanical AWES (like water pumping). The FAA only distinguishes various AWES concepts by existing flight factors covered in FARs, like conspicuity, mass-velocity, operational altitude, and overall safety.  When we fly ANY kite (like for data-collection) into regulated airspace, the FAA will hold us to the emerging AWES rules, rather than make an extra set of rules. JoeF and I are helping drive these FAA AWES policies.

Be careful to never misuse "AWES" by false statements like "not yet an AWES, since there is no generator", since this ignores FAA intent.


----------------- PS --------------------

Lets note that "AutoRotation" applies to all passive flow-driven rotation, from HAWTs and gyrocopters, to looping parafoils.











 
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11339 From: dave santos Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Initial Estimate of Large-Scale Circle-Belay Speed, (and Further Sca
A full circular bearing or track is a nice option for rotating Mothra arches, but kPower currently favors a simple compass-belay for Mothra; for RAD, KIS, and lowest-capital-cost. My personal bias is evident too, from my long varied industrial crane and rigging experience, where powerful belay is the natural work method all day long. Belay is the AWES arch rotation method available now.

Liftech Consultants reported quay-crane operations at 30 lifts per hour (2002). Each lift requires connecting, winching, and disconnecting; the same sequence holds for a Mothra compass-belay around anchor-circle points. If twelve anchor points on 1km dia. circle are assumed, and each leg of the arch counts as a separate belay, a ninety-degree "hot" direction adjustment will take ~12 minutes, far faster than normal prevailing winds change. Landed rotation relaunches in new directions after calm, and as a back-up to hot-belay. Note that arches easily tolerate 45 degree wind-shifts to either side, smoothly self-land if caught sideways. Also note that upwind-legs can pull downwind-legs upwind by rigging a cross-rope (saving on winch).

These belay time assumptions are reasonable up to single-km scale kite arch, but beyond that non-rotating kite "domes" are favored that will merely tilt downwind in bulk (faster). Even beyond that, a vast plane of tilting kixels can in principle attain planetary-scale, adjusting to many internal wind directions at once (fastest). There are no insurmountable scaling barriers here.

CC BY NC SA

------------------------------------------------

Liftech on Crane Productivity-

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11340 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

JoeF,

 

 "The law of conservation of energy means that AWES never "create" energy, but only convert extant energy from one form to another."

I agree.

" A simple kite does that."

A simple kite generates (never creates) force (N), not energy (J), not power (W) until a conversion system is linked or integrated to the kite. For example SkySails system is a simple kite if there is no work, no showed ship; in case of implementation with a ship, the set ship-kite makes a part of an AWES, the complete AWES existing in case of implementation of a hydroturbine for example. It is true that "AWECS" was more explicit. Maybe we can keep AWECS for systems converting energy but not towing, and AWES also for systems towing.

 

PierreB    




Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11341 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

DaveS,

Here is a text for clarification.

From Text - U.S. Government Printing Office :

"Airborne Wind Energy Systems (AWES) are described broadly as
mechanical devices that are moored to the ground, via a tether or
cabling component, for the purpose of capturing the fluid stream
kinetic energy of winds. The kinetic energy captured by the device is
then utilized in various fashions to generate electricity. In one
option, the wind energy is immediately converted into consumable power,
at the system component keeping the system aloft, and then transferred
to the ground by a mechanical tether, cabling conductor, or other
method. In another option, the combination of the wind, the aloft
device, and the mooring cables are systematically utilized to drive an
electrical generator located on the ground.
    The basic overall components that comprise various AWESs are fairly
similar in concept, however, the technologies and the specific devices
that keep them aloft differ dramatically. Such devices have leveraged
on similar engineering designs that apply to kites, balloons, kytoons,
aircraft wings, aircraft, airfoils, as well as others."

So a kite alone is not an AWES. An AWES converts energy, a kite does not. Note that for FAA the conversion is into electricity, and this text does not even mention "water pumping",but makes the difference between system aloft and system at ground.So by writing "The FAA does not distinguish Electrical AWES from Mechanical AWES (like water pumping)." you make both a false assertion and a confusion. 

Reading carefully this text (I have underlined some sentences to help you) before asserting "Be careful to never misuse "AWES" by false statements like "not yet an AWES, since there is no generator", since this ignores FAA intent."

 

PierreB



Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11342 From: dougselsam Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto
Pierre B.is right: most of what is discussed here is utter nonsense from the standpoint of the original stated outcome, which is superseding tower-mounted wind turbines.  What we in wind energy have, unfortunately, become used to, is an endless parade of newbie, wannabe, wind energy inventors, endlessly proposing the same silly ideas over and over.
The flapping flag aspect is about as bad as it gets.  We try and point out characteristics of what has been known to work, but after a while, we start to realize: There is simply nothing you can say to people who crave ignorance, and who will only accept failure, who can only target old ideas that have never shown any promise.
This group was, I had hoped, a new paradigm where the people would be at a higher level than the crackpots of the regular Yahoo group.  But that was wishful thinking.  We hear the same tired ideas here as we did in the regular group, and the people promoting these ideas here are even more obnoxious and intolerant of helpfully-offered criticism by veterans than the promoters of bad ideas in the regular wind energy group.  Oh well.  Maybe we just realize, blogging on the internet has its limitations.
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11343 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto
In any flying kite there is work (J.  Events of forces x displacement) being done by forces (N instances), energy (J deposits) conversions occurring, and interactions with adjacent and even remote other bodies (electrostatic fields). Advanced other machines brought into interaction with a flying kite system is ever an option, but not essential for the flying kite system to be an airborne wind energy object. The various works being done in a real flying kite are many; forces are essentially involved and can often be measured. The rates of the interactions can often be measured (W instances).  A kite system necessary includes wing set, tether set, and resistive set which could even be seen as another wing set): K ::{W1,T,W2} in media. Three integrated sets in real media entails interactions, thus forces, energy exchanges/converstions, and subsequent changes in both the K and the media.   It is the clever K to fulfill a specified task by use of a kite system, an AWES, sometimes by integrating complex parts into the kite system, say, a focused electrical generator beyond the extant generators already in the most simple  of flying kite systems. The extant unavoidable generators in the most simple kite system might not satisfy some designer whereupon he or she is free to make the kite system modified to get a certain desired result. 

    The SkySails kite system ever includes the kite system's resistive set; in the case of SkySails on a cargo ship traction duty, the kite system's resistive set (essential) involves winch, the hull, and the ocean. Similarly, in a simple toy kite held by hand, the resistive set of the kite system (without which glider occurs or simple art on the ground) is the hand, body, shoes, soil friction. 

   By option, SkySails towed ship could have a hydro-turbine dipped in the water, but globally such would be part of the resistive set of the kite system relative to the air parafoil wing.  The SkySails active kite system is an AWES without or without the having an electrical water turbine dipped into the ocean,

Some practice: Take exactly the wing of a toy Hi-Flier kite product (two-sticked covered wing). Place that wing on a dining room table. The wing is not yet a "kite" but just an object. Then make kite by adding string to the object and have the string connected to a resistive set, perhaps a person or planet earth; set the three so the wing is in the media air wind. When the wing is flying with some resistance from its integrated resistive set, then have AWES. Look closely and see a garden of energy conversions, works being done, measurable rates of work being done (power instances), and various instances of kinetic and potential energy involved. 

Soon, 
Cheers, 
~ JoeF

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11344 From: dave santos Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto
Pierre,

Nowhere does the FAA actually state "electrical only", as you mistakenly imagine. The FAA merely noted two broad electrical options, which everyone agrees are important.  A careful reading shows the FAA has not wrongly defined AWES to exclude pure mechanical applications, and that all kites in fact meet the basic AWES description JoeF and I offered you.

The basic FAA definition stands: "Airborne Wind Energy Systems (AWES) are described broadly as mechanical devices that are moored to the ground, via a tether or cabling component, for the purpose of capturing the fluid stream kinetic energy of winds. "

Remember, its up to us, as the AWES UAS expert community, to work with the FAA to define AWE broadly. Your vain desire  that the FAA to formally exclude non-electrical AWES will not find much support (maybe MikeB). 

JoeF and I  have worked harder than anyone in AWE to make sure the FAA allows all major AWES applications (like Kite Aerotecture) in its evolving AWES UAS regulations. Please support us to keep the FAA AWES definition broad and correct, as the best public policy,


daveS




On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 1:33 PM, Pierre BENHAIEM <pierre.benhaiem@orange.fr
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11345 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

DaveS,

 

"Nowhere does the FAA actually state "electrical only"". False again,from text I put again:" The kinetic energy captured by the device is
then utilized in various fashions to generate electricity
." Please do not call that there is not the term"only", it would be grotesque. It is clear FAA does not take into account of other means of conversion than electric generators.
You repeat again and again false arguing, hoping the accumulation of them will make some truth.

In fact the new definition of the term "kite" as "AWES" is an excellent excuse to do not put a conversion system for Mothra. Such arguing like "Your vain desire  that the FAA to formally exclude non-electrical AWES will not find much support (maybe MikeB)." flies at ground level.


 

PierreB





Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11346 From: dave santos Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto
Pierre,

So you really think the US FAA is excluding mechanical AWES? That would be a ridiculous policy. Please understand that the US FAA system is driven by user communities. Its up to us to clarify and define AWE FARs. The US AWE community will stand up to the FAA, and win, if they try to wrongly restrict AWES to electric-only! Whose side are you on?

Nowhere in the official FAA Policy declaration text is AWES restricted to electrical generation only. Instead, its obvious that all sorts of "data-collection" experiments are allowed under the AWES designation, without arbitrary electrical generation. For examples, testing AWES raw mechanical power or conspicuity can obvioulsy be done without the burden of electrical issues-

 Policy

Given the altitudes that these structures can operate and their
operating characteristics, the FAA concludes that they should be
studied and the potential impacts to the navigable airspace must be
identified and addressed. Presently, the FAA has an existing regulatory
framework that outlines standards for determining obstructions to air
navigation or navigational aids or facilities (see 14 CFR part 77). 14
CFR part 77 is utilized to evaluate the impact of wind turbines and
other forms of renewable energy on the navigable airspace. Therefore,
we conclude that any new forms of wind gathering devices would be
included in the Obstruction Evaluation Process, which is administered
under 14 CFR part 77.
Accordingly, the FAA announces that the provision of part 77 will
apply to temporary AWES proposals that will be used for data collection
purposes. The FAA finds that the provisions of 14 CFR part 77 can be
applied to these ``structures'' without the need to amend the
regulations. Permanent and operational AWES may be addressed in the
future upon further evaluations and risk assessments are performed. The
purpose of this change in policy is to allow for the continued
development of this emerging technology and to provide the FAA with
data regarding these devices so that the safety and integrity of the
NAS is maintained. Persons proposing to conduct temporary airborne
testing of AWES for data collection purposes must provide notice to the
FAA pursuant to 14 CFR 77.13(a)(1), which requires notice of any
construction or alternation of more than 200 feet above ground level.
In order to facilitate the timely manner in which AWES proposals
are reviewed, AWES developers and operators are requested to limit
temporary operations to the following:
(1) Airborne operations of AWES should be temporary in nature for
testing and data collection purposes only;
(2) Single AWES devices only (e.g.--no ``farms'' or multiple
simultaneous testing);
(3) AWES should be limited to a single fixed location (e.g.--no
mobile ground facilities);
(4) Testing is confined to heights at or below 499 feet above
ground level (AGL);
(5) Airborne flight testing of AWES will only occur during daylight
hours; and
(6) AWES will be made conspicuous to the flying public. (The
sponsor of the AWES will provide the FAA with their marking and
lighting scheme. FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1K (AC 70/7460-1K),
Obstruction Marking and Lighting, currently does not address AWES, but
may be used as a guide, as some portions may be applicable.)


On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 5:38 PM, Pierre BENHAIEM <pierre.benhaiem@orange.fr
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11347 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Pierre, 

      1. F.A.A. is a follower with poor hold of the possible and the fullness regarding AWES; when scientists and developer advance, then the FAA will do some catch up.  Here in the science arena for AWES, we have opportunity to explore what is and not let rulemaking followers define the science.   This is said with full respect that cooperation on use of airspace is extremely important and rules are to be genuinely respected. 


2. Your "So a kite alone is not an AWES. An AWES converts energy, a kite does not"  still carry a scientific error that seems to be the basis for the other error in the quote.  When you do discover that a kite alone does both convert wind energy and then also converts some of that energy to many forms of energy including electricity, then perhaps you will be able to see that a flying kite alone is an AWES mechanically, scientifically, practically, even if policymakers here or there don't quite care enough to see the facts. The FAA has responded to our community that has a loud voice emphasizing generation of electricity for feeding batteries and electrical grid loads; but emphasis by voices and responders does not define science. 


So, it seems spending some effort on proving that a simple flying kite converts the wind's energy to other forms of energy, even electricity, might be something here to do.  Getting a starting point: I am guessing we have full agreement that a simple flying kite alone converts some of the wind's kinetic energy into potential energy, as the wing and tether stay aloft instead of falling to the ground. Tell me if we do not both see that matter.     Assuming we have that in common, I step further. Some of the wind's kinetic energy taken into the kite system by interaction is converted into spring stretches by the bending of the materials of the kite system, the stretching of the tether, the stretching of the parts that make up the resistive reaction anchoring part of the kite. Such deformations are movement of matter in relation to other matter and work is being done in the kite system parts; energy is stored in some of these deformations and real kites in real winds end up with release of some of those loaded springs. Some of these work actions store energy in one form or another and then some of the release actions put the energy into another form, perhaps kinetic, and to be shown some electric. The rub of parts during the deformation, the rub of wind against surfaces are areas where some electricity is generated and then some of that electricity is resisted and changed into heat and perhaps light and perhaps chemical reactions for chemical-energy storage and some release of chemical energy. In all, whatever energy the kite system soaks up from the wind will be used in scores of ways to generate other forms of energy without creating new energy; the sum will not be greater than what was in the kite parts plus what was taken from the wind, no matter the forms of energy generated by the working parts of the simple kite system. Are we in agreement with this matter about the the parts of the kite working and converting to many sorts of energy whilst the parts of the kite system do the generating of the various forms of energy (light, noisy, heat, electricity, ...) ..?   The scene is still a simple conventional kite without adding parts from some electrical-generator company, but just say two sticks and a covering and a bridle and a single tether to the kite's major part call "anchor" which is not to be every neglected for a simple kite else the scene is no longer kite. 

     Would a physics reference help here to support that electricity and heat and noise and other radiations are generated by a simple flying kite system which takes on some of the wind's kinetic energy over its own specific chemistry that the kite parts bring to the flying session?   Maybe. So, I will task myself and invite other scientists to bring forward a robust disclosure of what happens when a non-flying simple pre-kite gets into the flying kite mode.   In the quiet stage before launch, the pre-kite is say on the ground hardly interacting with any upper winds. Then the new scene is that the wing and tether and resistive set come up into action mode; the wing begins to interact with the wind; the tether begins to act with the wind; the resistive set comes into action and resists what comes through the new phase of the tether.  These changes from pre-kite to kite takes work; forces move things; interactions occur. And the set of actions are varied; there are microscopic actions, macroscopic actions, actions at a distance, surface actions, bending actions, compression actions, tension actions, friction activity, temperature changes, accelerations of relative parts, material stresses and resulting strains. And such dynamics or set of works all involve energy conversions where in one stage a set of parts act as generators of the next form of energy (again, no total sum creation of energy, just conversions through multitude of generators). The simple kite flying is ever alive with very many processes ongoing with mini-generators generating various forms of energy by using energy taken from the wind and some taken from the inherent energy package that the kite-system parts brought to the game. Tweaking the dance, some people like to make music aloft that in part is sent down to the ground via air conduction for ears to hear, but we get off topic as musical kites are with the moving of the parts of the kite system toward a special end purpose; we can stay on the most simple kite to find it to be an AWES.  

      How many different ways does a simple flying kite do some electricity generation without bringing the complexity of a COTS electric generator into the kite system?  I invite physic experts to chime in on this; I invite some chemical experts to chime in on this; I invite electrical experts to chime in on this. I am not an expert authority on physics, chemistry or the the sector electricity; I must stand on the shoulders of reports by the experts in those fields.  So, I begin:  There is much talk about some electricity being generated when the wind flows over the surfaces of the simple kite system.  Ref1      The kite parts are made of different materials and as the parts take on some of the wind's energy the varied are found to contact rubbingly against one another causing some flow of electricity to occur that was not before occurring.    Ref2 

To be an AWES, a simple kite system need only show that it takes in energy from the wind and converts the energy to other forms of energy.  It is to be notice that a duration occurs for the flying session of a simple kite; it keeps taking in energy from the wind and the kite system keeps converting that energy to other forms of energy including sending energy out from itself to effect changes in other objects of the environment; the simple kite system is dynamically capturing the wind's energy and internally dynamically generating many forms of energy and dynamically radiating and altering the atmosphere and soil and people and animals and trees.  The simple kite system does not just take in energy, but is continuously sending out energy into the air and space and soil and other things. Smart receptors can indicate some of the continuous radiance from a simple kite. My ears hear the simple kite frequently. My ears and hands are worked by the kite's radiance through oscillations extant in the simple-kite's tether resultants; the simple kite loses or gives energy to others in many ways in many forms... all without COTS LEDS or special musical strings or special robust electric generators or special friction-heat generating parts. Just the simple two-stick Malay kite in flight is ever doing these dances, operations, conversions, generations, radiatings, givings. If the simple kite did not convert the wind, then it would fall to the ground; if the simple flying kite did not convert and generate other forms and radiate/give to parts not itself, then there would be a build-up of energy that would finally be intolerable, but that does not ever occur as equilibrium maintains. Balance occurs. The energy of the wind is converted nearly continuously to lift and drag and make heat and make electricity and make sounds in tether and sound in soil and sounds in air. 

Thus a simple kite is an AWES.   

That established, one could then decide to have a more complex kite system, say one that has in its resistive set a COTS Selsam generator; such generator becomes part of the kite system and becomes one of the ways that the wind's energy captured by the kite system finds a way to give some of that energy to batteries or grids. A kite system with such a Selsam generator is not longer just a Malay two-stick-single-line with a rock as the resistive set, but rather a system with a more complex near resistive set that includes an evolved converter: a Selsam generator. Without prejudice, the simple kite system is an AWES and the different system with the Selsam generator is an AWES. 


Soon, 

Best to all forms of AWE, 

Lift, 

~ JoeF



So

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11348 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

See related recent note that applies in part. 

Again, FAA is struggles to follow the science; they are not the science workers. It can be shown that a simple flying kite does always use of the the wind's energy to generate some electricity without any special COTS robust electric generator. So, even without crediting FAA, their poor following of the science gives text that is fulfilled by the simple kite system.  The FAA also barely is aware that conventional turbines have a noise challenge; the FAA is barely aware by TACO that kites make some noise also, as they are generators of sound besides heat and electricity, even without a Selsam generator off the shelf. 

      That some people will refine kite systems to generate more noise or more heat or more electricity than a simple kite configuration would give is open ground for creativity to do its thing. To fail to see that the simple kite is a converter of energy and a pile of generators converting one form of energy to other forms is to be aside of the science involved.  The FAA needs to care about airspace traffic safety; their job is not to be expert kite scientists; arguing from FAA poorness on science to effect just what the is the science brings on an intolerable situation for scientists;  traffic rule makers are not in the business of making the science unfold.  If an AWES makes light, then governors caring about light pollution will make rules. If AWES makes electricity, then governors of electrical safety will come into play.  If AWES makes heat, then forest rangers may step in and try to say something about forest fires.  If AWES drop things onto land, then city fathers and mothers will want to have a say and make some rules. If AWES move things from here to there on the ocean, then maritime governance will come into have their say.  But all that governing as such should not be the foundation for knowing the science. 

      The science shows that a simple kite without COTS generators or pumps does convert wind's energy and then generates some radiance to effect the environment, because the simple kite holds in the flying dynamic many steps of conversion and generation and conversion again. Such a foundation excites some of us to go ahead and refine what we put into a kite system to emphasize certain types of radiance; we design and develop to channel how we have the kite system use the wind's energy; some design to make music, some design to heat things by friction, some design to abrade things, grind grain, lift wet clothes to dry, move parts fast to scare birds, lift and drop things to pulverize the things for second uses. That advanced tasks may be accomplish should not prejudice anyone into not seeing that the very simple kite already plays in these matters, but perhaps not playing some advanced dance or application that can be in focus. 


Soon, 

Best, 

Cheers, 

Lift,

~ JoeF  


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11349 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

DaveS,

 

As usually you justify a false assertion by another false assertion. It is clear FF knows AWES as conversion systems for generating electricity. Mechanical AWES is often defined as groundgen where tether transmission is mechanical in opposition in electric cable within tether for flygen. If you want you can ask FAA to include pumping water as completely Mechanical AWES."Please understand that the US FAA system is driven by user communities." I am sure FAA also will include all kites according to your new definition (a kite is an AWES) ,allowing including Mothra; kites being known for a long time it is even not needed to define AWES! Please include also people as AWES (DougS by JoeF's voice, it is a beginning) , and also all the world as AWES...

 

PierreB





Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11350 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

JoeF,

 

"To fail to see that the simple kite is a converter of energy and a pile of generators converting one form of energy to other forms [are a converter of energy as well;it is not needed to add "one form of energy to other forms" making a pleonasm beside "converter"]is to be aside of the science involved."

I fail to see a simple kite as a converter of energy. A pile of generators is a converter of energy, a simple kite is not.

 

DaveS should replace poor people working in FAA and not understanding science:it is probably the only way for Mothra to work as an AWES...

 

PierreB 



Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11351 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/5/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

JoeF,

See my precedent post."Your "So a kite alone is not an AWES. An AWES converts energy, a kite does not"  still carry a scientific error". No in terms of industrial applications.So I repeat again my sentence and confirm it:"So a kite alone is not an AWES. An AWES converts energy, a kite does not".
By defining a kite as an AWES, cooperation with "poor" people of FAA is not needed, kites being known for a long time.

PierreB

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11352 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Is the present forum an AWEforum or a simple forum of kites?

The new orientation on the basis such like "a kite is an AWES" makes the AWEforum becoming a kite forum among numerous other forum of kites.

 

PierreB 

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11353 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

To be more precise and topic-in _ until the present forum becomes a forum of kites among other forums of kites _ the following comparison would be more exact: a kite is not a converter of energy, and a wind turbine is a converter of energy.

 

A pile of generators or a generator alone can be a part of a wind turbine, so a part of a converter of energy. Note again:"converting one form of energy to other forms" is what makes a "converter of energy". So it is not usefull and unclear to use "converter of energy" for kite beside "converting one form of energy to other forms" for a pile of generators (for a wind turbine being better for comparison).   

 

PierreB 




Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11354 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Ever-Raining Kite System, an ever-giving AWES

Ever-Raining Kite System, an ever-giving AWES
Have the kite system bring up water or other materials in a continuous or continual fashion using energy mined by the kite system from the wind. Drop the water or other materials in a continuous or continual fashion at various altitudes along the tether set and even at the wing set. Materials or chemicals taken up for raining down could be seeds, water, fertilizer, messages, food, animals, microbes, gliders, drones, personnel, sand, confetti, wings, kite systems, blankets, parachutes, fire retardant, gifts, tools, etc.

  • CC3.0 NC BY SA  ~ JoeF   6Feb2014 
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11355 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Pierre, 

       Work will be done toward helping people see that a simple kite is a converter of energy in several ways. Some effort has been made in the forum to demonstrate how a simple kite system is at essential core a converter of energy in more ways than one.  When such is seen, such does not dictate that a person must stay at the simple kite, but is allowed to refine the kite system in order to effect emphasized effects, like increase just how much light radiates from the system or how much electricity radiates from the system or how much sound radiates from the system. This forum is very heavily about refining from the simple kite system into complex kite systems that radiate heavily a chosen type of radiation or energy; electricity is a highly popular choice, but less still-valid choices are lift, traction, musical, material moving, etc. There is a sector of the AWES kite energy community that has decided to focus only on refining kite systems to emphasize radiating electricity from the kite system.  But there are other respectable sectors of the AWES community that are refining AWES kite systems to radiate sustaining lift of material and personnel for various reasons. And still other respectable sectors of the AWES kite energy community who are refining kite systems to radiate lifted water. Others to radiate chemicals manufactured in the kite system. These various radiations from the working kite systems use the captured converted wind's kinetic energy.  

     From your text, it seems like you are solid member of the kite systems that radiate electricity; your favored sector does not cause the other sectors to be any less valid. 

     That a simple kite system is already a converter and generator that radiates results from massaging captured wind's kinetic energy does not force the final character of this forum; this forum is dedicated to refining kite systems to effect the accomplishment of tasks including the task of turning the shafts of highly evolved electric generators integrated into the kite system either aloft or in the ground-area placed resistive set of the kite system. 

      Your statement: "I fail to see a simple kite as a converter of energy." might one day be a statement you will alter, but maybe not.   Evidence and argument will continually be refined to show that a simple kite is a converter of energy in more ways than one, and that the simple kite system radiates energy in forms that are generated within the simple kite system; and thus the simple kite system will thus show itself as a true AWES, without prejudice relative to refined non-simple kite systems that have specialized arrangements to radiate in one way more than another way.  How much adventure might be experienced to bring such light to you is not known; and it is interesting to me that you had not known that a simple kite system is such a converter and generator of forms of energy with a continual radiation to the environment, hopefully in such form as to be considered blessing and gift. 

      One of the reasons for the FAA to get involved differently than before is because their rules for kites were not flexible enough to handle the refined larger kite systems that are coming out of the industry that refines kite systems in order to do major practical works (one of the works is to radiate electricity, but that is not the only radiation in mind by the AWES community that is asking for airspace respect. Ultimately the era K3 ... the AWES era, will win respect and have its portion of the sky well governed. 


Soon, 

Lift, 

~ JoeF 

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11356 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Pierre, 

1. The vague fencing of "industrial applications" does not stop the simple kite's radiations; it is the clever person who can see even in the simple kite's radiations used in some "industrial" application. That such can be proven in such fuzzy text environment should in no way keep anyone in the AWES community from advancing into complex kite systems that radiate more of one kind of radiation than another by industrial-specific choice.  


2. Once one knows what an AWES is, then that same one will be able to see that a simple kite qualifies for membership in the AWES community. That situation in no way prevents AWES workers from advancing into arrangements for kite systems in order to get more of one kind of radiation than another.   On the other hand, it is of no use for an advanced AWES-holding person to deny the facts about a simple kite system's qualifying as a humble member of the sector. 


3. The "poor" of FAA ... by me was pointing to the relative expertise in the kite energy domain; the FAA personnel are spending their time with a focus that has them be cooperators with experts in specialized domains.  Hopefully they are "rich" in what they do and hopefully they get their minds enough around the specialized sciences to effect air-traffic safety and air-space-use equity. 


4. The kite has been known to a certain extent for a long time. However, the kite has been increasingly understood as time marches forward. And the kite is not fully known yet.There are yet unknowns in kite that are being chased by some people.  In the future, the kite should be better known than it is today. I know that each day I learn something new about kite; and increasingly I see how the kite even in its simplicity is a complex converter of energy, a complex set of generators of varying forms of energy, and a radiator of energy to the environment. And increasingly I see new ways to format away from the simple kite system into more complex or varied-structured kite systems in order to effect radiance from the kite system to accomplish different tasks. 


5. The increasing masses, altitudes, accelerations, bulk, use, etc. is having the FAA rethink "kite"as their prior kite rules faced a smaller activity. The FAA knew about barrage kytoons, and large sporadic kites, and toy and sport kites. But the era K3 is moving the FAA to adjust rules and air space control to accommodate the coming new dimensions of kite activity. Very definitely the cooperation of the FAA is needed for K3. 

Partners to enrich each other: FAA to K3 and K3 experts to FAA for advancing the richness of the partnership and overcome domain poorness.  K3 experts do not invest themselves to be top experts in working FAA things; FAA does not invest themselves to be top experts in AWES matters. Relative poorness and relative richness. 


Adventure continues, 

Lift, 

~ JoeF

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11357 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Is the present forum an AWEforum or a simple forum of kites?

Where is the bulk emphasis, Pierre? That a simple kite is an AWES does not change the bulk focus of the forum. The bulk emphasis of the forum from its birth is to refine kite systems to perform specialized tasks in the small to large through tens scales of AWES, including a high interest in heavy industrial service. The AWES forum is a certain kind of kite forum with a character, purpose, and mission that sets it apart from the toy-kite forums, the sport-power-kite forums, the history-focused forums.  That a kite is an AWES is an important seed; this forum is to grow that seed into arrangements that successfully accomplish tasks, including the task of radiating electricity into utility-scale grids.  That a simple kite already affects utility-scale grids does not stop this forum from spending its coin on advancing into huge kite systems that have their parts arranged to radiate gigawatts of rectified and treated electricity to serve nations. Rather, that a simple kite is a humble AWES already could motivate one to advance from the humble seed into the flourishing plant. Some of the advanced plants will radiate light, some electricity, some lift, some pull, some heat, some rained materials, some people, etc.    That a humble simple kite is a humble member of the AWES community is not sufficient reason to prejudicially flee from association with such humble member. Indeed, mastery of simple kites may well allow one to be a strong robust player in the game of heavy industrial kite systems.  There is hardly a lesson in humble-kiteville that does not have an analogue in advanced AWES.   This forum stands to gain from the works of other kite forums, but is not limited by the fences constructed in other forums; AirborneWindEnergy forum is slated to advance kite arts to effect substantial task accomplishments beyond recreation, beyond toy entertainment, beyond restive kiting, beyond the seeds ...   This forum is a place that invites the best science and engineering humans may muster to bring kite systems into formats that radiate practical blessings for earth, hopefully in small and big ways, some of which will replace some of the use of coal and oil in the world.


Best, 

~ JoeF

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11358 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Years ago at the beginning of the forum there was the exercise with tension with Dave Culp where for the forum I was showing how a simple flying kite is at basic a "wind turbine".   That conclusion has not stopped. It was shown how the wing set of a simple kite has the tether set as the turning radial task. In the activity of the simple kite, the wind interacts with the simple kite system and turning motions occur and the kite system is changed by its interaction with the wind. The change in the kite system is a result of being affected by the wind's kinetic energy; the kite system ... a wind turbine ... rotates, bends, deforms, springs compressingly, springs releasingly, generates various oscillations mechanically and electromagnetically and changes the character of its tether set and its resistive anchor set ...changing the world.   


In any case visitors to this forum are invited to advance the technology of kite systems to accomplish defined tasks. The tasks may be humble or earth-shaking. The formation of kite systems to accomplish certain tasks will challenge the best minds available. The building of industries using kite systems will be a robust adventure. A vast array of jobs will be needed to design, operate, maintain, de-commission, and use AWES.  


~ JoeF

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11359 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Ever open to the hot seat is the face of this forum. The snapshot of the face right today is placed in this post: 

============================


International rapid AWES development (RAD) of airborne wind energy conversion systems (AWES).  


Kite energy systems work to fulfill tasks or provide energy for others to use.

   

Advance the science and art 

of tethered craft (anchors may be fixed, mobile, moving, or even flying)

for capturing and utilizing

fluid stream kinetic energy.


Analogues in air and water form one art party. Domina Jalbert made it clear to the world that any sky-kite system has its obvious analogue in water, and thus obvious to those skilled in the arts. 


Top-level AWES aspects: Designing, Validating, Inspecting, Assuring Safety, Assuring Quality, Siting, Communicating, Insuring, Certifying, Operating & Maintaining, Piloting, Observing, Controlling, Advertising, Selling, Adjusting, Decommissioning. 


We have many leaders discussing and sharing technology. 

"a leading company in airborne wind energy" will be applied to those sharing in this forum.


Un-tethered airborne wind power plants are the focus of a group: DSUTWP at 

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DSUTWP/


The Great AWE Debate is ongoing. Mike Barnard and Paul Gipe have been invited to he debate.


A simple kite is already a wind turbine performing works. But this forum aims to advance kite systems for accomplishing small and humble tasks and huge global heavy industrial tasks. The tasks may include such as lifting, pulling, radiating light, radiating electricity, transporting goods and people.   Thousands of tasks await solutions by kite systems (AWES). 


============================


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11360 From: dougselsam Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto
Joe: Without reading your whole post, of course everyone knows a kite is a converter of energy.  It obviously uses the wind's energy to stay aloft.
But...
Again...
To start calling every kite an AWES system is just redefining terms again.
We all knew a kite flies, and that is all you are really saying, isn't it?
And heavier-than-air flight takes some energy, which is provided by the wind, but that is very old information.  Nothing new there at all.
I would say that redefining words has taken you and Dave S. about as far as it is going to take you, which is nowhere.
:)
Doug S.
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11361 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

Doug, 

      1. A part of something does not need to be taken as the ruler of the whole; other parts in the whole have their valid play; and the whole is greater than the parts. 


2. Your feedback missed an important space of concern. No, I have not been saying that a kite system just flied, but way more, that a kite system is an active complex set of converters and generators, even in the most simple of kite systems; flying or staying aloft is the result of just one of its many energy-conversion work results. Look at the deformations, the compressions, the spring releasings, the bendings, the active stressing and straining, the formation of radiations of many sorts; such go beyond just flying. And the simple kite is just a seed portending advanced kite systems that are so configured to radiate in focused manner to accomplished defined and varied tasks.  The seeds of all this are old knowledge, but the nurturing of the seeds to effect grand blessings on earth is the freshening called era K3. 


3. The text-word struggle during formation processes seems to be a natural tool of the mind. What is a kite ...whatever it is, is not changed by words or text. Words are our tools to help us get near to kite. Touch and vision are also tools to help us get near to kite. Mathematics and physics are other tools to help us know kite. Logic can server us as we approach the essence and potential of kite. When lessons and realizations occur during maturation, then text and freshened definitions are invited to reflect the advance. Each human person has their text that is distinct for them them; they bring their text into forums and there is ever a struggle to share perspectives, as each person's text is unique; we can learn from each other's text when we stay in the conversation helpfully. Focus on ideas and not on persons has been recommended by seasoned sages.  If our individual texts are not being altered, then it is my bet that growth has stopped. Growth will go hand-in-hand with people altering their personal texts as they learn from nature and others. At every new insight about kite, I am faced with a tease to review all other prior text to see just how the advancing perspective affects the prior text. The Text Space of today will pass away to be replaced with New Text; such is the way of good science and art. You are invited to help form the New Text, Doug.  I know that DaveS is with a continuing habit of forming New Text.   The kite text of a decade ago is less serving than the kite text extant today; and today's kite text will stand as inadequate for tomorrow.

     Your terse "nowhere" seems to be blind to new arenas entered by us and others. We have entered arenas that were not seen in earlier days. 


May your text be altered soon,

Best, 

~ JoeF

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11362 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Ever-Raining Kite System, an ever-giving AWES

In the arena of topic, we recall from earlier posts the lifting of uncharged batteries, charging the batteries aloft, and then dropping the batteries back to ground or to other receivers. The return could be effected by loop carriage, line-guide carriage, gliding technology, parachute technology, drone interfacing.   The lifting of the to-be-charged batteries could be done in various ways: tether-loop conveying, drop-loop elevating, drone servant, active side-assisting kite system dedicated to lifting the uncharged batteries to be left off to the aloft point. Etc. 

Why go to the trouble of lifting batteries to be charged? Why not just charge the batteries by kitricity while keeping the batteries on the ground?    Maybe conductive tethers are not in the budget or particular system vision. Maybe laser or microwave transmission is not the choice for some reason. Maybe groundgen arrangement would be too intrusive in some circumstances.  We are open for other rationale for the scheme of charging batteries aloft by flygen AWES. 


~ JoeF

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11363 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Ever-Raining Kite System, an ever-giving AWES

Rain ice in a continuous or continual flow from above. 

Either take water up high or capture atmospheric water by operating a specially designed kite system; let that AWES gather water ice and then drop or otherwise convey that water ice for uses on the ground. Humans use ice for many reasons. The capturing of atmospheric water to make ice aloft is a challenge in itself.   Lifting water to the AWES for conversion to water ice could be accomplished in many ways. The kite system could then "rain" or convey the water ice to ground points or to other aerial points using various means. 


~ JoeF

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11364 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Ever-Raining Kite System, an ever-giving AWES

Rain seeds from aloft working AWES has been mentioned before. But here we mention the operation in context with the topic. The involved kite system could be arranged to do several task depending on the particular seeding project. The AWES might give energy to convey the seeds to aloft points, might hold the sees for UV exposure for some time, might capture some atmospheric water to wet some certain types of seed, might capture atmospheric water to wet the dart holding a seed or seedling, might focus the sun to warm the seed-holding darts, might convert some of the wind's energy to heat to warm the seed-holding dart before dropping the dart, might generate the mechanism to operate the perhaps smart dart-releasing process.  

Then the darts are released for penetrating soils at particular points on earth. 


Or the raining of seeds might be in bags where human receivers on the ground will convey the bags for planting at their schedule.   Or the raining of seeds might be part of a bird-feeding program for conservation or research or farming.   Or the raining of seeds might be for care of land areas following a clearing that occurred by nature or action of humans or animals. 


~ JoeF

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11365 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Chinese Leadership in KIS Gigawatt AWE?

Granted now:
 

US 8405244

System and Method for Umbrella Power Generation

Assignee: Skywind, Inc., Fremont, California, USA


Filed: April 6, 2010

Granted: March 26, 2013

 The provisional application No. 61/215,201 had been filed on Mayb 4, 2009. 

U.S. Cl.  290/55

Jianjun Zhang

Nanzhi Zou

Wang-Long Zhou

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11366 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Giancarlo Zanetti | Zanettistudios | TWIND(R)

Our update brings a folder and some expanded notices and links: 

http://www.energykitesystems.net/Zanettistudios/index.html


connects with the owned TWIND®  trademark. 

Two techniques. 

Two patents. 

Updates on the tech direction and project are invited. 


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11367 From: dave santos Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Is the present forum an AWEforum or a simple forum of kites?
Pierre,

That a kite is an AWES is not new, but very ancient. Nor is this just be a simple kite forum, but its the forum discovering how kites might replace fossil fuels. To do that, we must become the best kiters ever known (you would then be a true god at Dieppe).

We therefore bravely aspire to be the greatest kite forum of all, rather than fear being just another kite forum "among numerous other forums".

Be brave with us,

daveS




On Thursday, February 6, 2014 7:51 AM, "joefaust333@gmail.com" <joefaust333@gmail.com
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11368 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Jianmin and associates
http://www.energykitesystems.net/Jianmin/index.html

Study and commentary are open. 
Updates are invited. 

Jianmin, Li
 Zheng, Li
 Ziaohong, Wang

[[Suspect machine translation of Chinese charactered texted names. ]]

=============================
~JoeF
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11369 From: dave santos Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto
Pierre,

Doug is right: "a kite is a converter of energy"

The question then follows- Is a kite a system? If so, then a kite is an AWES, in the strict scientific sense.

According to Systems Theory, a kite clearly qualifies-


The AWES Forum is the living spirit of kite science, even to informing the FAA; and welcomes you to disagree, as the greatest kite forum ever,

daveS


On Thursday, February 6, 2014 8:00 AM, "dougselsam@yahoo.com" <dougselsam@yahoo.com
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11370 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Yongping, Li
YONGPING, LI

and 

and


Open for study, discussion, and project updating. 

PS: 
[[Open volunteer positions:  
China AWES reporter
Japan AWES reporter
India AWES reporter
Spain AWES reporter
Germany AWES reporter
Norway AWES reporter
Denmark AWES reporter
...
etc. for each non-English nation
]]
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11371 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: HUANG JIAYUE and FENG XUAN
[[Suspect machine translations of the names from Chinese characters.]]


HUANG JIAYUE  and FENG XUAN

Open for study, discussion, and updating. 

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11372 From: dave santos Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Great AWE Debate (Engineering-Science Winning)
Gipe and Barnard both declined a formal team debate offer over the engineering and economic viability of AWE; Pierre had been asked to team up with them. Nevertheless a virtual online debate ensued, as this review describes.

Gipe rested his "Anti-AWE" position on two long posts on his blog. Barnard churned out reams of poorly informed skepticism on his blog. Pierre asserted "AWE is not economically viable"  on the AWES Forum, and long continued to argue so. This new mass of "Anti-AWE" writing was a worthy presentation of the Anti-AWE side of the Great AWE Debate.

On the "Pro-AWE" side, Gipe was forced to concede his facts were wrong (without changing his mind), Barnard's crude thesis was annihilated by seven PhD "rocket-scientists". Pierre is close to conceding that kites are AWES (therefore AWE is economically viable, at least in the case of kite stores).

It looks like the Pro-AWE kite-aerospace community has dominated the virtual debate on science-engineering merits. Does Anti-AWE have any final arguments to offer, before Pro-AWE declares victory?

Of course, this is just virtual debate. Future AWES testing will be the final arbiter.


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11373 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Is the present forum an AWEforum or a simple forum of kites?

JoeF,

 

If a simple kite is an AWES, we admit all forums about simples kites are also forums about AWES. So the present forum is not "the" AWEforum (with KiteGen forum) but a forum among others about AWES.The number of stakeholders seen on Stakeholders - EnergyKiteSystems.net would be not about 700 but millions times 700. It is a new orientation.

 

For the best,

 

PierreB 



Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11374 From: dave santos Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: DIY Solar-Powered AWES "Obstruction Lighting"
How best for experimental AWES to meet FAA obstruction lighting requirements?

Existing aviation-grade obstruction lights start at about 200 USD for a single red LED package. Not included is a means to self-charge aloft, for AWES use. The precise FAA  visibility requirement is to be seen 4000ft away in clear air. Reliability cost is high for long unattended use. kPower has been testing quality bike lights for the AWES role, and find they meet the visibility requirement, but replacing batteries is a costly nuisance.

Common LED landscape lights are close to meeting all basic requirements. These charge by day, self-start at dusk, and turn-off at dawn. The best versions can shine all night even after a cloudy day. The brightest versions sell as floodlights, and should pass the 4000ft test when aimed correctly (which can be certified by us, after testing). Cost is low, around 5-30 USD per unit.

AWES are required under UAS rules to have a Pilot-In-Command and Visual-Observer. This flight-crew can monitor obstruction lighting to promptly correct failure. Therefore high-reliability can be met even by cheap consumer-grade units. The numerous lights needed to mark a kite farm ensures that a few local failures are tolerable. Redundant  units at each location can sum luminance and reliability as needed.

Small gaps exist in landscape light specs: Red lights and strobe flashing are not supported. AWES lighting must shine 360 degrees. preferably as a single unit . An AWES product with these features could quickly emerge from landscape light COTS, with minimal re-engineering. Meanwhile. we can hack these units to blink or spin as tiny Savonius rotors, for a white-strobe effect, and/or use reflectors and red filters to meet a desired experimental spec (filters not preferred).

CC BY NC SA
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11375 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Distinguishing some families of AWES regarding autorotating roto

DaveS,

 

A kite uses wind energy to stay aloft but does not convert wind energy by itself _ using is not converting _ ,until a conversion system is linked or integrated, the set making an AWES. The great difficulty for a viable scalable AWES is both the abilities to stay aloft and to convert wind energy (electricity, pumping water or another form of energy) in an economical way.   

 

 

PierreB




Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11376 From: Pierre BENHAIEM Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Great AWE Debate (Engineering-Science Winning)

DaveS,

 

"Pierre is close to conceding that kites are AWES..." No! All my posts indicate the contrary. A kite is not an AWES: a kite uses wind energy to stay aloft, an AWES converts wind energy. Please try to win about a realization of an AWES, not about arguing.

"Pierre had been asked to team up with them. ": yellow journalism.

I precise again AWES could maybe become economically viable; that means now it is not the case. The problem is not a debate between anti-AWE and pro-AWE, but the realization of a credible system. Note that for both Paul Gipe and Mike Barnard their position is about existing systems in a next future, not necessarily in the absolute. I do not think to redefine kite as AWES will help to realize a viable AWES.

 

PierreB 





 

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 11377 From: dave santos Date: 2/6/2014
Subject: Re: Is the present forum an AWEforum or a simple forum of kites?
Pierre,

JoeF should probably change the "stakeholder" term to "direct participant" or equivalent. If AWE can save the world from excessive climate change, or be corrupted to oppress populations, then all affected are true stakeholders.

There is no real conflict between the AWES Forum and other kite forums. What makes us unique is members with an explicit commitment to RAD at an expert level. No other kite Forum even comes close. KiteGen's forum is barely active, and mostly focuses on KiteGen. NASA's forum failed to ignite, since the AWES Forum had already emerged. 

You are inventing strange false problems (Kites are not AWES, too many Kite Forums, etc.). Of course we constantly "redefine" ourselves better, as we continue to learn, and "new orientation" is a natural learning dynamic. Don't be left behind,

daveS


On Thursday, February 6, 2014 2:55 PM, Pierre BENHAIEM <pierre.benhaiem@orange.fr