Home
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

 

February 2010
Notes from AWE Sector subscribers

x
Projectile kite.     Shoot the pilot kite up through the trees to good wind to get an AWECS system started.

http://www.cmnapower.com/

CMNA Power, LLC
Texas LLC in January 2008.
Wind energy tech in July 2007.
Six staff and several regular consultants.

Craig Varrichio, president and Lead Designer.
University of Texas, Austin

Mark Landry, VP and Lead Analyst

Anthony Varrichio, VP and Lead Engineer. EE for 30 years. Eight patents. Eleven patents pending.

Chad Harper, Business Development Associate.
info@cmnapower.com 

For more information about the events including speaker line up, agenda and the full brochure, click on the links below.
Offshore Wind Energy Europe Conference,
7-8th April, Radisson Blu Scandinavia Hotel, Copenhagen
How to construct, connect and operate a profitable offshore wind farm in Europe
Event website: http://www.windenergyupdate.com/wind-conference/

US Wind Turbine Supply Chain Conference,
12-13th April, Wyndham Hotel, Chicago, Illinois
Develop powerful strategies to seize your share of the rapidly evolving North American wind turbine manufacturing industry
Event website: http://www.windenergyupdate.com/SupplyChainUSA 

2nd Annual US Wind Energy Operations and Maintenance Summit
April 20-21st, Renaissance Dallas Hotel, Dallas, Texas
Develop a robust and cost effective OandM strategy to ensure you dramatically reduce turbine downtime and boost your wind farm's power production
Event website: http://www.windenergyupdate.com/OperationsandMaintenanceUSA/ 
Call for Presentations
2010 Small Wind Conference

We are accepting proposals for presentations at the 6th Annual Small
Wind Conference, June 15th and 16th, 2010, in Stevens Point,
Wisconsin.

Presentations should be limited to 15 minutes, with an additional 5
minutes for QandA. Small wind is defined as 1kW up to 100kW.

Presentation categories are not yet finalized, pending the responses
we get. However, we are seeking presentations in the following areas:
o Turbine testing and results, including measurement and
verification programs
o Wind resource assessment, monitoring, and siting lessons
o Case studies of installations and performance
o Case studies of installations at schools or educational institutions
o Installer issues, including successful and problem
installations, and barriers encountered, and how they were resolved
o Anything else that might be of value to small wind
installers, manufacturers, dealers, public benefits programs, state
energy offices, or turbine owners
The preference is for "experienced based" presentations with data.

Please submit proposals to Mick Sagrillo at mick@smallwindconference.com
by February 12th. The proposals will go to the advisory committee
for discussion and decision.
Decisions will be made on presentations in a few weeks so presenters
have adequate time to prepare their presentations.

Presentations proposals submitted for other renewable energy
conferences will be considered.

Anyone interested in sponsoring or exhibiting at the Small Wind
Conference should contact Samantha at Windustry at 612-870-3474 or
samantha@windustry.org

The Small Wind Conference Coordinating Committee

Roy Butler Trudy Forsyth
Jenny Heinzen Mick Sagrillo
Downloads - Quick Links  From AWEA
 

 

 


Reel Shape- A wide reel has a fairly constant mechanical ratio as line is removed or added and allows line to dry easier. A narrow reel has a highly variable progressive mechanical ratio such that when all the line is out, and the kite is pulling strongest in wind aloft, the skinny spindle diameter has a high mechanical advantage; but as the line is retracted onto its own backing it runs faster, helping land the kite right to the reel in low surface wind.

ElectroTethers- A reel for an electrotether needs rotary contacts to convey current past itself. Such reels typically require special insulation and grounding. Winding an electrotether into many coils on a reel will cause well known impedance and magnetic field effects. High voltage, high frequency AC, and ferrous reel construction augment such effects. Inductive and resistive heating  of electrotether on the reel may be a factor. AWE schemes requiring high current VTOL from a loaded reel could be particularly problematic.

Multi-reels have many variations
 

A gurdy is a set of reels on one drive shaft with a clutch on each spool. Fishermen use this rig to troll with multilines, selectively reeling any line as needed. 

Multi-lines can be reeled onto one spool provided a fairlead array orders them, especially combing the lines apart on unreeling.

A single winch/capstan can serve many lines serially, just as a sailboat might use a single winch for multiple functions. 

Winching power can migrate between winching stations, just as a sailor carrys around a winch handle from winch to winch. At an AWE field a motor unit might be rolled around to apply winch power at any point.

Lines rigged with connectors, swivels, and other small tackle can generally be wound onto a reel without problems particularly if the fittings are small and smooth and tension is moderate. Siderigged gear on a line can even be taken up, perhaps onto sidetrack space on the spool. Notches in a spool wall facilitate sidetracking.

Limit stops and varied sensor targets (magnetic, optical, etc.) on a line enable precise winch/reel automation. Line length and reel revolution counters provide a more general state picture.

Extra line is commonly stored on a working reel. As leader sections wear they are trimmed and new line wound out.

Selecting motive power for winches follows a well established pattern across scale. Without going into explanation, at the tiny scale electrostatic motors are favored, at mini to medium scale human-power or direct electric (gear) motor driving is good, at medium scale pneumatic actuation is practical, and at the largest scale hydraulic power is a sound choice. An electric motor driven compression stage is common for the last two fluid power scales, but direct kite power compression could serve.

Tensioners of many kinds are a common line handling expedient. Backlash snarls of slack line at the kite reel have been addressed by Peter Lynn (Sr.) with a small water flow in a tube that extrudes line slack. Compressed air may be desirable.
 

Hacker Tip- A reel made from a wheel rim can be walled up for high capacity by taking the tire, splitting it around the circumference and mounting the sidewalls crossed inside-out back onto the rim.

CoopIP                                      4feb2010M1064

What is that CoopIP?     ==>  C
Rotary electric machines.  
Linear electric machines.   
Linear actuators
.
http://wstiac.alionscience.com/pdf/AQV4N1_ART06.pdf

Megawatt electric power systems (MEPS)  airborne:  How might these be considered in a high altitude wind energy mining (HAWEM) operation?

The fly-gen     generator part   receiving special attention:
http://wstiac.alionscience.com/pdf/AQV4N1_ART06.pdf

Getting power generated per pound or kg  seems to be a target of the US Air Force.
Such advancing may well play into the plans of those in AWECS that intend to
have fly-gens or FEGs in high-end utility scale AWE  It seems that the advances on the airborne generators
are arriving from down-sizing cryro-coolers and in advances in
high-temperature superconducting wires.
 

[[hyperconductors  are not quite superconductors]]

Link to Heronemus Windship:
http://www.phoenixprojectfoundation.us/uploads/Phoenix_Project_Paper.pdf

Professor William Heronemus

Inventors:  Uzi Ezra Havosha  Gal Pri-Paz
Agents:
 UZI EZRA HAVOSHA and PARTNERS
Assignees:
Origin:
TEL AVIV, omitted
IPC8 Class:
AB64B150FI
USPC Class: 244 33

Read more: http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20080223982#ixzz0fBD1wz0T

HyperFlags and Rooster-Tails

As it turns out, sequentially synchronous "firing" of multiple membrane wing-mills is a simple and easy AWE method.

A key synch pattern is to fire three wings in rotation, pulling on three lines in turn (ADCABCABC...). This action will drive a triple crankshaft on the ground, just as Lloyd long ago disclosed. The new trick is to array wingmills along a pilot line downwind where the leading wing's oscillation sets up a wave that flows in turn to the next wing in line, and so on. It looks like a waving rooster tail hung upside down.

Consider a flag where the flapping wave starts at the pole and propagates downwind. A flogging headsail acts the same way: the tensile continuity of the fabric reliably acts as a waveguide. Further imagine that the flag is skeletonized into a herringbone pattern of ribbon wings and you have a "hyperflag."  I made some this morning and observed highly enhanced oscillation with much less material. To tap this motion lines are rigged (and tuned) from the lower wingtips in phase to a conventional (ideally COTS) crankshaft.

See the many old KiteLab posts on membrane wing-mills for important practical details.

CoopIP
Tensile-Toys™

The quest for cheap AWE has given us a modular engineering language based on tensile force. Of the endless applications education is basic. Many an engineer enjoyed early intellectual stimulation form mechanical systems like Tinker Toys, Erector Sets, or Lego Robotics. Sadly such "rich-kid" resources are often out of reach to the economically disadvantaged, but as low cost tensile engineering drives revolutionary invention, a cheap modular system of tensile elements is potentially an educational super-toy for all.

The fundamental element of this curriculum is string, already a highly developed resource in folk toy traditions that nurture spatial perception and dexterity. The study of string structures and knots stimulates mathematical intelligence, from geometry to topology and even, well, knot theory.

Kiting and fishing are quintessential string tech. An key tool is the larkshead knot, a loop mated to a stopper knot, allowing strings to connect and disconnect at will, without added parts. A few powerful knots enable infinitely varied tensile devices.

An educational kit suitable for a child or class room is possible at a cost of pennies to a dollar or two. Assorted string and elastomer, a few swivels, membrane material, micro pulleys, adhesive, and a few spars is enough for amazing feats even exceeding the expensive kits. Kites, string instruments, and endless contraptions are core activities. One major advantage of Tensile Toys is how large scale structures are possible "for a song."

Inspired instructions and examples are essential to unleash the creative potential of these simple materials. The latest understanding of tensile engineering, of tensegrity, tensarity, and so on, is needed to properly imagine this new educational tool. The string must be specified within safe breaking strengths and is best biodegradable. A continuum of string tools from a toy "micro" scale to the largest engineering scales is a fantastic toolbox.

Primary compressive structures for Tensile Toys are borrowed from ambient structures like trees, buildings, and terrain. Anchors such as ribbon/belting, simple hooks, etc., are used to interface the tensile elements to the world. String spider connectors serve as hub pieces much like Tinker Toys.  Complex 3D lattices of string can do wonders as yet unimagined. Let the children play.

CoopIP

[larkshead knot, larks head knot, lark's head knot] 

 

 

Not sure whether the instructor achieved aims or not, but this matter would come into question when one is planning multiple lifted turbines:    Discussion is invited.

Tethered Wind Transducers   TWT

The final finishing surface treatment of tethers and kite part surfaces may be of material quite distinct from the structural interior of the parts. Optimizing AWECS will invite engineering the final surface treatments. Maintenance of a system will concern with surfaces finishes. Moisture barriers, UV barriers, insulation barriers, colorization, conductivity, etc. are some of the concerns that invite surface treatments.  Smoothness, roughness?  Photovoltaic surface? Heating?  Cooling? Signal carrier? Hazard colorization patterns?  Message-holding?      Every material has its final surface structure and chemical makeup; just what that final surface does to the efficiency of the system for the system's full life is something to be known and respected.      Surfaces decay, but ever a final surface is extant; the timed changes in a surface finish is a matter of concern.  During gross exploration and design of AWECS, surface finishing may take fairly a distant seat to large assembly design features. Surfaces meet the weather, air flow, atmospheric moisture, rubbings, microbes, dust, air pollutants, cosmic rays, handling oils, and sun rays. The surface is a very active environment.                              CoopIP           jpf   15Feb2010         
Working kite, work kite, working kites.    Working Kite Association (WKA)    Such an association has yet to form, so this is a proposal among many..   Kites (mooring, tether, main interaction body) already work to convert wind energy to mechanical energy that results in the kite self-sustaining up in the air (or water for water kites or paravanes). However, the emphasis that the kite system is employed to do tasks beyond the first action of converting wind energy to mechanical energy.  Use a kite to do a task and thereby have the kite win the title of being a "work kite" or "working kite."
Dr. Kim Jongchul    and his work toward seawind use of wind at 1481 m ASL for parafoiled tracted ships that would generate energy to supplant the world's needs for energy.  See his papers for sure.    M1157  
Wind power generation with a parawing on ships, a proposal
J. Kim
a, C. Park b,*
 
a
Korea Aerospace Research Institute, 45 Eoeun-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Aerospace Engineering, 373-1 Guseong-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-701 Korea, Republic of Korea

= Kim JC, Song JH, Oh KR, Song BS. ‘‘Novel Power Generation System Using Wind Energy at High Altitude,’’ paper presented at the Fall, Conference of Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences. 2007.
== International Patent F03D 9/00. ‘‘Electric Power Generation System Using Hydro Turbine Tracted by Paraglider,’’ Jongchul Kim inventor, PCT/KR2006/004271, April 24, 2008.

T.W. Bennett T.W.,  Roy Fox, Jr..    Design, development and flight testing of the NASA X-38   7,500 ft2 parafoil recovery system. 
Google’s resident “green energy czar,” Bill Weihl said in a QandA last month-
"The other one (alt energy) that we’re looking at is high-altitude wind — ways to capture the stronger and steadier winds that are at 500 or 1,000 or 2,000 meters high, or potentially even up in the jet stream. Internally, we’ve been looking at taking traditional wind turbines and putting them on much taller towers so you can get to much stronger steadier winds. Today, with the way people build towers, it would cost a lot more to go up to 200 meters compared to the usual 80 meters. We’ve been looking at some ideas that would let you go up and build a turbine at 200 meters at very little extra cost. If that pans out, it would be a way to knock 20 or 30 percent off the cost of wind, and wind is pretty close to the cost of coal today.
We’ve also invested in a company called Makani Power that is doing high-altitude wind using an airborne platform. They’ve been looking at using a kite or a wing under autonomous control, where the wind pulls the kite out and you change the angle of attack so you can wheel it back in at less cost than the energy would make going out. The other approach is to use some kind of wing with propellers on it and the generators on the wing. So you’re flying a kite through the wind and it’s making the propeller spin so it’s acting like a wind turbine, and then you have to get the power down the cable back to the ground. There are other companies in that space with some similar ideas."  
SEE FULL INTERVIEW NY Times


================

Analysis: Because of the corporate secrecy involved the clues are faint and uncertain-
Makani has been purged from Goggle's alternative energy front pages and Bill refers to the investment in the past tense. Makani is known to have had its Google funding cut.

A major change is the acknowledgment that there are other AWE companies that they are following.

Google is unlikely to reinvent the tower in any fundamental way. Perhaps guyed masts are envisioned.        ds

Discussion is open:

  •  

Coming tether note by DS

In water, air, and other fluids

Related news that have aspects that may be affecting the growth of airborne wind energy conversion systems:

tether technology,

Serving all 10 scales of airborne wind energy.
Publishing in AWE since 1961 beginning with The Ideal High Jump. Then Penny Poem, KiteSA, Low and Slow,
Hang Glider Magazine, Hang Glider Business Weekly, Hang Glider Weekly, HighJump,
Hang Glider History, Lift, EnergyKiteSystems, and AWE Sector.

Want to donate regarding your former experience with us
to further advance AWE communications?  
        
Thank you,
Lift to you and yours,

 JoeF,
AWE Sector publisher

Ad:  Want a vacation in Oahu, Hawaii?  Fly kites, surf great waves, rest, recover?

More Gigawatt COTS AWE

Existing TGV technology
(electric bullet-train with regenerative braking) can be a basis for converting large-scale raw mechanical AWE input into gigawatt scale electricity.

A TGV of as many "engines" as desired for a rated output would be pulled around a track-loop by an AWE tri-tether (just as a crank is driven) and output electricity in regenerative mode. The strengthened track would be reverse banked with a retaining link to the center-point and reside in a depression clear of overhead lines.

A kite-train of stacked looping parafoils such as the ~10 MW Gigafly might easily drive a tri-tether/TGV loop at high speed. Such a kite train could eventually consist of over a hundred kite elements and loop at a low diagonal angle along ~20,000 m of tether all the way to the tropopause (~10,000 m high). This is gigawatt scale.

The overall parafoil stack would work like a bacterial flagellum run backward, or perhaps upside down. Such a large aerostructure runs in such relative slow motion that its in a low Re regime similar to a microorganism's. Mastering complex spiral waves so as to produce high speed cable motion (up to ~500 km/h for a hot TGV) on the ground will be fun. A TGV loop conceivably might input towing force to keep the kite stack aloft in calm.

There is considerable labor involved in these approaches. The loopers can be manually parachute packed and popped sequentially as launch proceeds. They would be "kite-killed" in the normal way and retracted at low pull to be repacked. Terrain, aerotowing, and many other handling tricks might apply.

This approach applies at far more modest scales as well. An electric car could be so rigged at the ~100 kW scale. KiteLab has shown looping kites and tri-tethers are effective means to drive a crank geometry load.

CoopIP

The magic of a tether is how great tensile force is transmissible between points with minimal mass and cost.      Kites————for most AWE————critically depend on tethers to convey reaction between the surface and the wind flow-field. 

Phonon (virtual particle) theory is an atomic-scale quantum explanation of how kiteline "tug" transmits force over distance. Model a single bond in a kiteline molecule can quantify how much tug is phonon transfer and how much energy dissipates as convective and radiative energy for total thermodynamic transmission efficiency. At macroscales most kiteline behavior is better characterized by classical mechanics of waves in a physical medium (stress-waves) although atomic properties still influence critical behavior.  In fact, phonons and stress waves are merely different views of the same solid-state physics. Electron transmission, the basis of many AWE schemes, is discussed downpage.

A dancing kite feels tether-force as quasi acceleration, a dynamic virtual gravity much like a science fiction "tractor beam". Unlike gravity, tether-force is capricious, truly chaotic, with slack and jerk in odd directions. Since aero-towing began almost 100 years ago, glider pilots (and later hang-glider and paraglider pilots) have dreaded "lock-out", where control is mysteriously overwhelmed and the towed aircraft hooks and dives into the ground. Gradually pilots developed heuristics (guidelines) to avoid lock-out, without fully understanding the phenomenon. In collaboration with KiteShip in '07 in Alameda I got to meet Don Montague (a kitesurfing buddy of the Google Founders and CEO of Makani Power). At that time I raised lock-out as a fundamental kite failure mode. Both companies ordered copies of Towing Aloft, by Dennis Pagen, an empirical start at understanding and eliminating lock-out.  Its taken a couple of years of further study to formally identify multiple causes for lock-out emerging from the complex harmonic interaction of wind, kite, and tether. 

Wind is mostly uncontrollable partially predictable input
to which a kite is roughly reactively matched.
     Experienced kiters match the weight of a tether to wind strength.  Altitude along the windspeed gradient can be somewhat selected. Tunable critical-damping of the kite's inputs across all conditions is a key to reliable flight.  Tether selection and setting is the easiest most flexible tuning means.

Modern polymer tethers are very reliable if well attended.  Large kite designer and showman Peter Lynn gets about 200 days of tether life without worry; and some sport fliers get away with years of almost unlimited use. I have been flying the same tethers for hundreds of hours to see how they age and only once in recent years has a tether parted unexpectedly, burnt out in electric hail.  As Mario Milanese has observed, flying multilines is pretty much guaranteed to prevent runaway.   [[Log tether use, incidents, inspections. A tether is as ready for a use as its weakest station. Smart tether monitoring?]]

Two broad classes of AWE tether are Electrically Conductive Tethers for FlyGens and Polymer Tethers for tractive applications like GroundGens.  Conductive Tethers suffer from higher mass and aerodrag than polymer tethers of equivalent power transmission, but may be favored on small scales and when mechanical transmission proves less practical. One overlooked problem with high altitude conductive tethers is enhanced corona discharge at lower atmospheric pressure. This limits transmission voltage or entails more insulation mass.

Electrical failure mode of a tether is important: If the circuit opens, then the load gets spiked and the turbine might overspeed.  If the circuit is shorted, then the flygen will brake suddenly, possibly burning out and breaking turbine blades. Conductive tethers are considerable hazards around power lines and lightning. In non-saline atmosphere, polymer tethers are not direct shock/short hazards when downed on power lines and are not a major lightning risk.

The strongest fibers allow the thinnest and lightest tethers. High performers have a lower ROI if too pricey. Primary factors are yield/breaking strengths, elasticity, aerodrag, and mass. Other considerations include UV/abrasion resistance and melting point. The best performing common kiteline is Ultra High Molecular Weight PolyEthylene (UHMWPE; Dyneema/Spectra) which rivals in strength early carbon nanotube samples. Polyester and Nylon are cost-to-performance competitive with UHMWPE when stretch and thicker cross-section is allowable. Nylon is favored when some stretch is desirable but has low UV resistance. Elastomer, usually synthetic or natural rubber, is used for shock absorbers and compliance mechanisms. For terrain enabled applications, where weight limits are relaxed, wire rope (galvanized steel) is hard to beat. Its possible biomaterials like silk, hemp, linen, and cotton will find a place in advanced kiting due to aesthetic or environmental grounds. There are many curious tether interactions, for example, cotton will saw, or rather melt, a stronger UHMWPE tether due to its higher heat resistance.

Like weight, tether aerodrag is fundamental limiting factor to kite performance. Line rake is a great drag reduction mode, the more rake angle the more simple round line wins by unbeatable strength-to-drag. Crosswind tethers are high drag. No real-world tether is truly worst-case crosswind as some catenary angle is always raked in along most of its length. Angled upward downwind they generate downforce and must be longer for a given altitude. Angling a conductive tether upwind against a downwind angled polymer tether may help flygen applications.

Faired tethers is a well known and obvious idea. Good data has existed for nearly fifty years since MIT first did experiments. Faired tethers do have considerably less drag but the balsa TEs MIT tested don't survive normal usage and suitable material hardly exists to this day. Line twist and strumming drag is uncontrollable without weight and complexity penalties. Faired line entails handling and wear issues with pulleys, fairleads, and reels. Round line of the same strength has less drag than ribbon sectioned line due to lessened strum. Twisted fibers with a fine enough texture have an aero advantage, by shedding strum canceling vortices and acting like golf ball texture, postponing detached flow.

A graded tether made up of stronger lower sections and thinner upper sections, with swivels in between, out-performs a long monotether. To assemble a tether in sections with hardware like swivels and shackles is classic art from the Victorian Era. High wear sections are sleeved or overspecified without much added weight. A multi tether is runaway resistant, but many lines adds snag risk and other operational challenges. A kitefield is best purged of all snags.

Dipping booms (think fishing-pole) and elastic sections ("snubbers") absorb peak loads to maximize tether reliability and performance. One use of a snubber is at a pilot-lifter bridle to insulate it from yanking by a power element downline, like a looping foil.    [[line snubber, mechanical snubber, electrical snubber]]

KiteLab has observed Sudden Tether Sag (STS) experimentally, most dramatically in heavier lines such as electrical conductors. An inclined tether that first slacks at the kite creates a transverse wave that moves quickly downward (faster and at higher amplitude the more massy the tether). As such a wave races groundward its hard to retract fast enough to prevent touchdown. An engineer at HAWP09 questioned the massy faster sag observation by citing Galileo, to wit, a heavy tether must sag as fast as a light one. A less elastic and less draggy (by increased strength growing faster than cross-section) tether sags a bit faster, but this is not the main sudden sag effect. Dave Lang, the AWE's tether guru, has seen similar sag effects in his simulations. STS is a major challenge in large high-altitude flygen schemes, as McNaughten & Co. suggest.

Powerful kite tethers are quite hazardous. They have lassoed and pulled aloft kiters and dropped them dead. Thin tethers easily cut flesh and dejoint like a machete, while a thicker line might only burn. Joe Hadzicki taught me that when all hell breaks loose and killer kiteline is whistling about, you should crouch slightly, chin tucked, clasping your ears with elbows tucked. Thus poised jump-rope nimbly over any ground sweeping lines. The idea is to protect your throat, jugular, and all other major arteries and veins, not to mention your balls, and your ears too, since getting them sewn back on is a hassle. Better too for a line to saw at bone than cut right thru a joint. Wear gloves with gauntlets to handle fine line; carry a hook knife; dress to minimize snags; write your will; and don't freak.

CoopIP     ... Draft ...working on this currently....

Redaction on February 28, 2010 in group forum:

Tethers are like powerful magic for transmitting great tensile force between points with minimal mass & cost. AWE kites depend on tethers to convey Newtonian reaction between the ground & wind. Most kiteline dynamics is well described by classical mechanics of waves in a physical medium (stress-waves). Phonon (virtual particle) theory is the atomic scale quantum explanation of kiteline "tug". In fact phonons & stress waves are merely different views of the same solid-state physics. Electron transfer is the added basis of conductive AWE tethers.

A kite & its tether must dynamically adapt to wind, which is often chaotic. Kiters select the weight of a tether & set its length to fit along the windspeed gradient with altitude. A dancing kite feels tether-force as quasi acceleration, a dynamic virtual gravity much like a science fiction "tractor beam". Unlike gravity, tether-force is capricious, itself a chaotic source, with slack & jerk in odd directions. Tunable critical-damping of the kite's inputs across all conditions is a key to reliable flight. Tether tuning is the easiest most flexible adjustment.

Since aero-towing (powered kiting) began almost 100 years ago, glider pilots (& later hang-glider & paraglider pilots) have dreaded "lock-out", where control is mysteriously overwhelmed & the towed aircraft hooks & dives into the ground. Pilots learned to mostly avoid lock-out without well understanding the phenomenon. Towing Aloft, by Dennis Pagen, is a good reference for taming lock-out. Its taken a couple of years of further study to formally identify multiple causes for lock-out emerging from the complex harmonic interaction of wind, kite, & tether. An common example is when a short tether's harmonic period roughly matches a kite's yaw period; wild instability ensues, much as a double pendulum acts freaky. Previous posts have detailed the tether harmonic issue.

Modern polymer tethers are reliable when well chosen & cared for. Some sport fliers almost never replace line & get away with years of avid use. The key is to start with good line slightly over specified for conditions, trading reliability for a bit extra drag. KiteLab flys the same tethers for hundreds to thousands of hours to see how they age & only once in recent years has a tether parted unexpectedly, burnt out in electric hail. As Mario Milanese has observed, flying multilines is pretty much guaranteed to prevent runaway.

Conductive tethers suffer from higher mass & aerodrag than polymer tethers of equivalent power transmission, but may be favored on small scales & where mechanical transmission seems less practical. One overlooked problem with high altitude conductive tethers is enhanced corona discharge at lower atmospheric pressure. This limits transmission voltage or entails more insulation mass. Electrical failure modes of a tether matter: If the circuit opens the load is spiked & the turbine overspeeds; If shorted the load still sees an open circuit, but now the flygen will brake suddenly, possibly burning out &/or snapping turbine blades. Conductive tethers are considerable hazards around powerlines & lightning. Conductor heating can melt the polymer load bearing part of a tether. Conductor hazard mitigation is by such means as bypass conductors, fuses/cicuitbreakers, varisters, UPSs. etc. In non-saline conditions, polymer tethers are not direct shock/short hazards when downed on power lines & are not a major lightning risk.

The strongest fibers enable the thinnest & lightest tethers. Highest performers suffer a lower ROI if too pricey. Primary qualities are yield/breaking strength, elasticity, aerodrag, & mass. Other factors include UV/abrasion resistance & melting point. The best performing standard kiteline is Ultra High Molecular Weight PolyEthylene (UHMWPE; Dyneema/Spectra) which rivals in strength early carbon nanotube samples. Polyester & Nylon are cost-to-performance competitive with UHMWPE when stretch & thicker cross-section is allowable. Nylon is favored when some stretch is desirable but has low UV resistance. Elastomer, usually synthetic or natural rubber, is used for shock absorption & compliance. For terrain enabled applications, where weight limits are relaxed, wire rope (galvanized steel) is hard to beat. Its possible biomaterials like silk, hemp, linen, & cotton will find a place in advanced kiting due to aesthetic or environmental grounds. There are many curious tether interactions, for example, weaker cotton will saw, or rather melt, a stronger UHMWPE tether by greater friction & heat resistance.

Like tether weight, aerodrag fundamentally limits performance. Line rake is a great drag reduction mode, the more rake angle the more simple round line wins by unbeatable strength-to-drag. Crosswind tethers are high drag. No tether is truly worst-case crosswind as some catenary always rakes in. Angled upward downwind tethers generate downforce & must be longer for a given altitude. Angling a conductive tether upwind against a downwind angled polymer tether may help flygen applications. Faired tethers is a well known & obvious idea. Good data has existed for nearly fifty years since MIT first did experiments. Faired tethers do have considerably less drag but the balsa TEs MIT tested don't survive normal usage & suitable material hardly exists to this day. Line twist & strumming drag is uncontrollable without weight & complexity penalties. Faired line entails handling & wear issues with pulleys, fairleads, & reels. Round line of the same strength has less drag than ribbon sectioned line due to lessened strum. Twisted fibers with a fine enough texture have an aero advantage, by shedding strum canceling vortices & acting like golf ball texture, postponing detached flow.

A graded tether made up of stronger lower sections & thinner upper sections, often with swivels in between, can out-perform a long monotether. Assembling a tether in sections with hardware is classic art from the Victorian Era. High wear sections are sleeved or overspecified without much added weight. Multiple kites often promptly saw each others lines if allowed to cross. A multi-tether is runaway resistant, but many lines adds snag risk & other operational challenges. A kitefield is best purged of all snags. Knots are well known weak points in a line. The basic cause of weakness is looping line under stress around a tight radius. Nicks & abrasion are far more common failure modes. One can usefully assume a common knot to be within a tolerance for replacing worn line. Previous posts have detailed the rigging & flying of complex train, arch, & mesh tether/kite arrays.

Dipping booms (think fishing-pole) & elastic sections ("snubbers") absorb peak loads to maximize tether reliability & performance. One use of a snubber is at a pilot-lifter bridle to insulate it from yanking by a power element down-line, like a looping foil.

An inclined tether that slacks suddenly at the kite (usual cause- a reverse eddy "pocket") creates a transverse wave that moves quickly downward (faster & at higher amplitude the more massy the tether). As such a wave races groundward its hard to retract fast enough to prevent tether touchdown. KiteLab often observes this experimentally, most dramatically in heavier lines like electrical conductors. Call it Sudden Tether Sag (STS). An engineer at HAWP09 discounted STS & particularly questioned the massy faster sag observation invoking Galileo, to wit, a heavy tether must sag as fast as a light one. A less elastic & less draggy (by strength growing faster than cross-section) tether sags a bit faster, but this is not the main sudden sag effect. Maybe its that a heavy tether has more self-tension & thus a higher internal "speed of sound". Dave Lang, AWE's tether guru, has seen similar sag effects in his simulations. STS is a major challenge in large high-altitude flygen schemes, as McNaughten & Co. suggest.

Power kite tethers are quite hazardous. They lasso & pull aloft kiters & drop them as did Osborne's Monster to Eideken. When that tether parted it snapped back like a cannon shot & would have killed more had not the human ants at the anchor point scattered. A moving AWE tether can suck you into machinery. Thin tethers easily cut flesh & dejoint like a sword, where a thicker line might only burn. Joe Hadzicki taught me at NABX that when all hell breaks loose & killer kiteline is slithering or whistling about, you should crouch slightly, chin tucked, cupping hands over ears with elbows tucked. Thus poised jump-rope nimbly over any ground sweeping lines, a hazard Peter Lynn describes well. The idea is to protect form garroting the throat, jugular, & all other major arteries & veins; dangly bits & ears too, since having them sewn back on is a hassle. Better for a line to saw at bone than slice right thru a joint. To handle fast moving tethers under high tension; wear gloves with gauntlets, carry a hook knife, dress to minimize snags, & carry an organ donor card.

Thanks to Dave Lang for having answered many tether questions over time & for helpful input to this overview.

COOPIP

Note: the above two versions are being evolved in the following place:

Tethers [ Temporarily, this is in subscription folder: Access: AWE Sector] "The magic of a tether is how great tensile force is transmissible between points with minimal mass and cost. " Notice: There are two versions of the article; each version has interesting gems; the two versions are presented side-by-side HERE.

NTS   Nature Transport System       Ref1    
Transport goods and people on rail while charging huge batteries. Not only do the goods and people get to destinations, but at the end there is a won lot of energy. Do this by using kite systems on land or water.

PPPM       Tether? Tendon?
http://tinyurl.com/AWECSmodelPERHAPS